The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Identification and Characterization of a Low Phytic Acid Wheat
Abstract
Phytic acid ( myo ‐inositol‐1,2,3,4,5,6‐hexa kis phosphate, or Ins P 6 ) is the most abundant storage form of P in seeds, yet indigestible by humans and nonruminant livestock. A wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) mutant is described herein with greatly reduced seed phytic acid P but little change in seed total P, similar to lpa 1‐type mutants described in other grain species. One nonlethal mutant from 562 ethyl‐methanesulfonate (EMS) mutagenized M 2 lines was identified with a high inorganic phosphate (HIP) phenotype and designated Js‐12‐LPA. Js‐12‐LPA homozygotes produced seed in which phytic acid P represented 48.2% of seed total P, in contrast to 74.7% of seed total P in nonmutant or wild‐type control, Js‐12‐WT. The inorganic portion of seed P was increased from 9.1% in Js‐12‐WT to 50.1% in Js‐12‐LPA, with little effect on total seed P. Weight distributions among milling fractions were similar for the Js‐12‐LPA and Js‐12‐WT genotypes. The low phytic acid trait altered the distribution of total P within the kernel, increasing the P content of the central endosperm and decreasing the P content of the bran. The low phytic acid trait decreased the phytic acid concentration in the bran by 43% and increased the inorganic P concentration in the bran nearly four‐fold. Inheritance data of F 2 and F 4:6 families was inconsistent with a single‐gene mutation and suggests the involvement of two or more genes. This low phytic acid wheat mutant is a genetic resource for studying the biology of seed phytic acid metabolism and wheat quality improvement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
White, P. J., & Broadley, M. R. (2009) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02738.x · Cited by 2,178
Shewry, P. R. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erp058 · Cited by 1,292
Enhancing the mineral and vitamin content of wheat and maize through plant breeding
Ortiz-Monasterio, J. I., Palacios-Rojas, N., Meng, E., Pixley, K., Trethowan, R., & Peña, R. J. (2007) · Journal of Cereal Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcs.2007.06.005 · Cited by 494
Vlčko, T., & Ohnoutková, L. (2020) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants9020195 · Cited by 74
Powers, S. E., & Thavarajah, D. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01489 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Guttieri, M., Bowen, D., Dorsch, J. A., Raboy, V., & Souza, E.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 418-424
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W2043017457
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification and Characterization of a Low Phytic Acid Wheat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci2004.4180
- The paper
- Guttieri, M., Bowen, D., Dorsch, J. A., Raboy, V., & Souza, E. (2004). Identification and Characterization of a Low Phytic Acid Wheat. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.4180
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.