The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Large‐Effect QTL for Grain Yield under Reproductive‐Stage Drought Stress in Upland Rice
Abstract
Genetic control of yield under reproductive‐stage drought stress was studied in a population of 436 random F 3–derived lines from a cross between the upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars Vandana and Way Rarem. Screening was conducted under upland conditions at IRRI during the dry seasons of 2005 and 2006. Lines were evaluated in drought stress and nonstress trials in both years to identify QTL contributing to drought resistance. For QTL detection, a set of random lines and the highest and lowest‐yielding lines under both stress and nonstress conditions were genotyped by 126 SSR markers. A QTL (qtl12.1) with a large effect on grain yield under stress was detected on Chromosome 12 in both years. The whole population was genotyped for additional markers on Chromosome 12, allowing QTL localization to a 10.2 cM region between SSR markers RM28048 and RM511. Under stress conditions, the locus also increased harvest index, biomass yield, and plant height while reducing the number of days to flowering. Under nonstress conditions, qtl12.1 did not significantly affect any trait. The additive effect of this QTL on grain yield under stress was 172 kg ha−1 per year over the 2 yr of testing, representing 47% of the average yield under stress and explaining 51% of the genetic variance. The yield‐increasing allele was derived from the susceptible parent, Way Rarem, suggesting an epistatic effect. This is the first QTL reported in rice having a large and repeatable effect on grain yield under severe drought stress in the field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Steele, K. A., Price, A. H., Shashidhar, H. E., & Witcombe, J. R. (2006) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-005-0110-4 · Cited by 370
Cited by
Quantitative Trait Loci and Crop Performance under Abiotic Stress: Where Do We Stand?: Table I.
Collins, N. C., Tardieu, F., & Tuberosa, R. (2008) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.108.118117 · Cited by 559
Kumar, A., Dixit, S., Ram, T., Yadaw, R. B., Mishra, K. K., & Mandal, N. P. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eru363 · Cited by 423
Self-citationVikram, P., Swamy, B. M., Dixit, S., Ahmed, H. U., Teresa Sta Cruz, M., Singh, A. K., & Kumar, A. (2011) · BMC Genetics · doi:10.1186/1471-2156-12-89 · Cited by 391
Self-citationDixit, S., Singh, A., Sandhu, N., Bhandari, A., Vikram, P., & Kumar, A. (2017) · Molecular Breeding · doi:10.1007/s11032-017-0737-2 · Cited by 96
Self-citationGenetic response of growth phases for abiotic environmental stress tolerance in cereal crop plants
Ali, Q., & Malik, A. (2021) · Genetika · doi:10.2298/gensr2101419a · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernier, J., Kumar, A., Ramaiah, V., Spaner, D., & Atlin, G.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 507-516
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W2080615452
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Large‐Effect QTL for Grain Yield under Reproductive‐Stage Drought Stress in Upland Rice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci2006.07.0495
- The paper
- Bernier, J., Kumar, A., Ramaiah, V., Spaner, D., & Atlin, G. (2007). A Large‐Effect QTL for Grain Yield under Reproductive‐Stage Drought Stress in Upland Rice. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.07.0495
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.