Cited by 28Plant Stress Responses and ToleranceGenetics and Plant BreedingGenetic and Environmental Crop Studies

Genetic response of growth phases for abiotic environmental stress tolerance in cereal crop plants

Open access
Ali, Qurban, Malik, Arif·2021·Genetika

Abstract

The yield potential and quality of main cereals crop plants including maize, wheat, rice and barley have improved through breeding and introduction of transgenic crop plants from last three decades. There has been intensive research for the improvement of resistance against biotic and abiotic environmental conditions to safe the potential of cereal crop plants. Among abiotic stresses drought and heat are two most important abiotic factors which caused major loss in yield and quality of crop plants. The heat stress leads towards drought due to loss of water from soil and plant surfaces, therefore drought and heat caused combined adverse effects on plant morphological, physiological and yield traits which leads to reduce crop plant potential. There has been always an interaction among the environmental conditions and crop plants to produce grain and restore productivity. The drought and heat stress caused changes at cellular level, molecular changes and gene expression changes in cereals at various vegetative and reproductive stages/phases of crop growth and development. A large number of genes have indentified in cereals which switch up-regulated and down-regulated during drought and heat stress conditions. However, there is a need to improve resistance in cereals at gene level to maintain potential of yield and quality under abiotic stress conditions like drought, heat, salinity, and cold.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2298/gensr2101419a

Cites

292 of 292 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 296 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. ELANGOVAN, M. (2007): Molecular dissection of breadmaking quality in wheat (triticum aestivum). PhD thesis, Plant Molecular Biology Unit Division of Biochemical Sciences National Chemical Laboratory Pune 411008 (INDIA).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ali, Q., & Malik, A.
Affiliations
University of Lahore (PK)
Venue
Genetika
Published
2021
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
419-456
ISSN
  • 0534-0012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1820-6069
OpenAlex
W3165777945
Cited by
28
References
296
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetika (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
Keywords
abiotic stress tolerance, drought stress, heat stress, cereals, maize, wheat, rice, barley, gene expression, growth phase, genetically modified crops, salt stress, cold stress, yield potential

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review