The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interaction of Tillage and Soil Texture Biologically Active Soil Organic Matter in Illinois
Abstract
Several long‐term studies suggest that no‐till (NT) practices do not increase soil organic matter (SOM) sequestration in all situations. We evaluated the interaction of tillage and soil texture effects on SOM in Illinois Mollisols and Alfisols by characterizing particulate organic matter (POM), potentially mineralizable N (PMN), and soil microbial biomass (SMB). Thirty‐six fields were sampled during spring and summer of 1995 and 1996. Each field had been under either conventional tillage (CT) (disc, moldboard plow, and/or chisel plow) or NT management for at least 5 yr. No‐till fields contained 15% (3.0 g C kg −1 soil) more soil organic C (SOC) than CT fields in the 0‐ to 5‐cm depth; however, tillage did not affect SOC contents in the 5‐ to 15‐ or 15‐ to 30‐cm depths, or in the overall sampling depth (0–30 cm). Fields under NT contained 33% more POM (1.4 g C kg −1 soil) and 54% more PMN in the 0‐ to 5‐cm depth, but there was no tillage effect on POM (0–15 cm) or PMN (0–30 cm) contents overall. Average POM contents were 29% lower (0.73 g C kg −1 soil) in the 5‐ to 15‐cm depth of the NT than of the CT soils. At sand contents below ≈50 g kg −1 soil, NT fields contained greater SOC, total N, and POM contents in the 0‐ to 5‐cm depth and lower POM contents in the 5‐ to 15‐cm depth than CT fields. In soils with sand contents higher than ≈50 g kg −1 soil, tillage practices did not affect the vertical distribution of SOC, total N, or POM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Calculation of organic matter and nutrients stored in soils under contrasting management regimes
Ellert, B. H., & Bettany, J. R. (1995) · Canadian Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.4141/cjss95-075 · Cited by 1,686
Crop Rotation and Tillage Effects on Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen
Havlin, J. L., Kissel, D. E., Maddux, L. D., Claassen, M. M., & Long, J. H. (1990) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400020026x · Cited by 652
Cited by
The Soil Management Assessment Framework: A Quantitative Soil Quality Evaluation Method
Andrews, S. S., Karlen, D. L., & Cambardella, C. A. (2004) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2004.1945 · Cited by 1,341
Haynes, R. J. (2005) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(04)85005-3 · Cited by 1,010
The Nature and Longevity of Agricultural Impacts on Soil Carbon and Nutrients: A Review
McLauchlan, K. (2006) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-005-0135-1 · Cited by 494
Is conservation tillage suitable for organic farming? A review
Peigné, J., Ball, B. C., Roger‐Estrade, J., & David, C. (2007) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2006.00082.x · Cited by 434
Conservation tillage and depth stratification of porosity and soil organic matter
Kay, B. D., & VandenBygaart, A. J. (2002) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/s0167-1987(02)00019-3 · Cited by 416
Metadata
- Authors
- Needelman, B. A., Wander, M. M., Bollero, G. A., Boast, C. W., Sims, G. K., & Bullock, D. G.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1326-1334
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W408387472
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interaction of Tillage and Soil Texture Biologically Active Soil Organic Matter in Illinois. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj1999.6351326x
- The paper
- Needelman, B. A., Wander, M. M., Bollero, G. A., Boast, C. W., Sims, G. K., & Bullock, D. G. (1999). Interaction of Tillage and Soil Texture Biologically Active Soil Organic Matter in Illinois. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.6351326x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.