The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rhizosphere Effects on Decomposition: Controls of Plant Species, Phenology, and Fertilization
Abstract
Plant species and soil fertility presumably control rhizosphere effects on soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition, but qualitative and quantitative descriptions of such controls are still sparse. In this study, rhizosphere effects of soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) on SOM decomposition were investigated at four phenological stages under three levels of fertilization in a greenhouse experiment using natural 13 C tracers. The magnitude of the rhizosphere effect ranged from 0% to as high as 383% above the decomposition rate in the no‐plant control, indicating that the rhizosphere priming can substantially intensify decomposition. The rhizosphere priming effect was responsible for a major portion of the total soil C efflux. Cumulative soil C loss caused by rhizosphere effects during the whole growing season equated to the amount of root biomass C for the soybean treatment, and 71% of root biomass C for the wheat treatment. Different plant species produced significantly different rhizosphere priming effects. The overall rhizosphere priming effect of soybean plants was significantly higher than for wheat plants. Plant phenology significantly influenced the rhizosphere priming effect. Little rhizosphere effect occurred in both wheat and soybean treatments initially. The priming effect of the wheat rhizosphere reached 287% above the no‐plant control at the flowering stage and declined significantly afterward. The priming effect of the soybean rhizosphere peaked at 383% above the no‐plant control during the late vegetative stage and remained at high levels onward. Contrary to many published reports, NPK fertilization did not significantly modify the rhizosphere priming effect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stability of organic carbon in deep soil layers controlled by fresh carbon supply
Fontaine, S., Barot, S., Barré, P., Bdioui, N., Mary, B., & Rumpel, C. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06275 · Cited by 2,279
Is soil carbon mostly root carbon? Mechanisms for a specific stabilisation
Rasse, D. P., Rumpel, C., & Dignac, M.-F. (2005) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-004-0907-y · Cited by 1,861
Carbon input by roots into the soil: Quantification of rhizodeposition from root to ecosystem scale
Pausch, J., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13850 · Cited by 1,010
FEEDBACK IN THE PLANT-SOIL SYSTEM
Ehrenfeld, J. G., Ravit, B., & Elgersma, K. (2005) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144212 · Cited by 886
Fungi mediate long term sequestration of carbon and nitrogen in soil through their priming effect
Fontaine, S., Henault, C., Aamor, A., Bdioui, N., Bloor, J. M. G., Maire, V., Mary, B., Revaillot, S., & Maron, P. A. (2011) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.09.017 · Cited by 832
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, W., Johnson, D. W., & Fu, S.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1418-1427
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W2038137051
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rhizosphere Effects on Decomposition: Controls of Plant Species, Phenology, and Fertilization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2003.1418
- The paper
- Cheng, W., Johnson, D. W., & Fu, S. (2003). Rhizosphere Effects on Decomposition: Controls of Plant Species, Phenology, and Fertilization. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.1418
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.