The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hydrologic Impacts of Thawing Permafrost—A Review
Open accessAbstract
Core Ideas: This review synthesizes the state of the science in permafrost hydrology. Observed and projected hydrologic impacts of permafrost thaw are discussed. Characterization, modeling, and knowledge gaps of permafrost systems are identified. Translating results between multiple scales in cold regions presents a challenge. Opportunities for advancement in the field of permafrost hydrology are described. Where present, permafrost exerts a primary control on water fluxes, flowpaths, and distribution. Climate warming and related drivers of soil thermal change are expected to modify the distribution of permafrost, leading to changing hydrologic conditions, including alterations in soil moisture, connectivity of inland waters, streamflow seasonality, and the partitioning of water stored above and below ground. The field of permafrost hydrology is undergoing rapid advancement with respect to multiscale observations, subsurface characterization, modeling, and integration with other disciplines. However, gaining predictive capability of the many interrelated consequences of climate change is a persistent challenge due to several factors. Observations of hydrologic change have been causally linked to permafrost thaw, but applications of process‐based models needed to support and enhance the transferability of empirical linkages have often been restricted to generalized representations. Limitations stem from inadequate baseline permafrost and unfrozen hydrogeologic characterization, lack of historical data, and simplifications in structure and process representation needed to counter the high computational demands of cryohydrogeologic simulations. Further, due in part to the large degree of subsurface heterogeneity of permafrost landscapes and the nonuniformity in thaw patterns and rates, associations between various modes of permafrost thaw and hydrologic change are not readily scalable; even trajectories of change can differ. This review highlights promising advances in characterization and modeling of permafrost regions and presents ongoing research challenges toward projecting hydrologic and ecologic consequences of permafrost thaw at time and spatial scales that are useful to managers and researchers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Multi-source global wetland maps combining surface water imagery and groundwater constraints
Tootchi, A., Jost, A., & Ducharne, A. (2019) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-11-189-2019 · Cited by 165
The land–ocean Arctic carbon cycle
Vonk, J. E., Fritz, M., Speetjens, N. J., Babin, M., Bartsch, A., Basso, L. S., Bröder, L., Göckede, M., Gustafsson, Ö., Hugelius, G., et al. (2025) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-024-00627-w · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Walvoord, M. A., & Kurylyk, B. L.
- Venue
- Vadose Zone Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1-20
- ISSN
- 1539-1663 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2432405417
- Cited by
- 1,112
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrologic Impacts of Thawing Permafrost—A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/vzj2016.01.0010
- The paper
- Walvoord, M. A., & Kurylyk, B. L. (2016). Hydrologic Impacts of Thawing Permafrost—A Review. Vadose Zone Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2016.01.0010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.