Cost Pass-Through in Strategic Oligopoly: Sectoral Evidence for the EU ETS
Open accessAbstract
Price adjustments, particularly the cost pass-through relationships, are at the core of the analysis on how asymmetric climate change policy initiates two channels of carbon leakage: (decreasing) market shares and profit margins. Using advanced time-series techniques, this paper explores the pass-through relationships in an oligopoly setting. Under the condition of oligopolistic competition with strategic interactions, the cost pass-through of domestic firms is restricted by strategic interactions with foreign competitors. The empirical section demonstrates that strategic pricing in the presence of the incomplete cost pass-through is by far the prevailing behaviour of German energy-intensive sectors participating in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). The relatively low cost pass-through rates in the long-run in most sectors in our sample – in comparison to studies which do not account for strategic interactions – are consistent with earlier findings. Additional costs induced by the EU ETS are therefore likely to be absorbed through a reduction of profit margin, creating incentives to relocate business abroad. Policy implications of the results are that strategic interactions between domestic and foreign firms could be a critical factor in applying offsetting instruments to address carbon leakage domestically. Accounting for oligopolistic structures – with and without strategic interactions – should therefore be a central issue within the broader context of how market structure affects climate change policies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Emission allowance costs represent about 2% of the total production costs of the European refining industry.
“However, emission allowance costs also represent a very modest share of the total production costs of the European refining industry, estimated at about 2% (Alexeeva-Talebi, Citation2011).”
From Why does emissions trading under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) not affect firms' competitiveness? Empirical findings from the literature (2019) · cites this paper as Alexeeva-Talebi, 2011
Empirical studies of the refining industry show PTRs of about 100%, i.e. full cost pass-through.
“Empirical studies of the refining industry show PTRs of about 100%, i.e. full cost pass-through (Alexeeva-Talebi, Citation2011; De Bruyn, Markowska, de Jong, & Bles, Citation2010; Oberndorfer et al., Citation2010).”
From Why does emissions trading under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) not affect firms' competitiveness? Empirical findings from the literature (2019) · cites this paper as Alexeeva-Talebi, 2011
Cites
CO <sub>2</sub> cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power sector
Sijm, J., Neuhoff, K., & Chen, Y. (2006) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2006.9685588 · Cited by 576 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Walker (2006) conducts a comparable study for the European cement sector.”
Demailly, D., & Quirion, P. (2006) · Climate Policy · doi:10.3763/cpol.2006.0606 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Joltreau, E., & Sommerfeld, K. (2019) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2018.1502145 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
“If firms cannot pass-through the costs of the EU ETS, they may have to decrease profit margins or may decide to exit the market and / or relocate (Alexeeva-Talebi, 2010). However, the literature shows no negative effect on competitiveness and we find no evidence of carbon leakage (see section 4.6). These negative effe…”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Alexeeva-Talebi, V.
- Affiliations
- Centre for European Economic Research (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Alexeeva-Talebi, Viktoria
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1927691059
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
- Keywords
- cost pass-through, EU Emissions Trading System, carbon leakage, strategic pricing, energy-intensive industries, German energy sector, market structure, profit margin
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review