PreprintCited by 19Climate Change Policy and EconomicsMerger and Competition AnalysisEnergy, Environment, Economic Growth

Cost Pass-Through in Strategic Oligopoly: Sectoral Evidence for the EU ETS

Open access
Alexeeva-Talebi, Viktoria·2011·SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract

Price adjustments, particularly the cost pass-through relationships, are at the core of the analysis on how asymmetric climate change policy initiates two channels of carbon leakage: (decreasing) market shares and profit margins. Using advanced time-series techniques, this paper explores the pass-through relationships in an oligopoly setting. Under the condition of oligopolistic competition with strategic interactions, the cost pass-through of domestic firms is restricted by strategic interactions with foreign competitors. The empirical section demonstrates that strategic pricing in the presence of the incomplete cost pass-through is by far the prevailing behaviour of German energy-intensive sectors participating in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). The relatively low cost pass-through rates in the long-run in most sectors in our sample – in comparison to studies which do not account for strategic interactions – are consistent with earlier findings. Additional costs induced by the EU ETS are therefore likely to be absorbed through a reduction of profit margin, creating incentives to relocate business abroad. Policy implications of the results are that strategic interactions between domestic and foreign firms could be a critical factor in applying offsetting instruments to address carbon leakage domestically. Accounting for oligopolistic structures – with and without strategic interactions – should therefore be a central issue within the broader context of how market structure affects climate change policies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.1674850

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexeeva-Talebi, V.
Affiliations
Centre for European Economic Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Alexeeva-Talebi, Viktoria
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1927691059
Cited by
19
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Keywords
cost pass-through, EU Emissions Trading System, carbon leakage, strategic pricing, energy-intensive industries, German energy sector, market structure, profit margin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review