Cited by 109Digital Economy and Work TransformationDigital Platforms and EconomicsFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance

The Online Platform Economy: Has Growth Peaked?

Open access
Farrell, Diana, Greig, Fiona E.·2017·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.2911194

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rate of growth of platform labor is influenced by conventional labor market conditions.

    “Farrell and Greig (2017) find that the rate of growth of platform labor is influenced by conventional labor market conditions.”

    From Dependence and precarity in the platform economy (2020) · cites this paper as Farrell and Greig 2017

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farrell, D., & Greig, F. E.
Affiliations
JPMorgan Chase & Co (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Greig, Fiona E.
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2620752614
Cited by
109
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Keywords
platform work, gig economy, online labour platforms, employee retention, outside options, unemployment, earnings, self-employment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review