The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Potentialities and Limitations of Blockchain Technologies in the Governance of Social Enterprise Collectives: The Case of Smart Ibérica
Abstract
Social Enterprise (SE) scholars have explored the complexity behind the governance of SE collectives, including polycentricity, high degrees of autonomy, decision-making processes not based on capital ownership and a strong participatory culture (e.g. Borzaga & Defourny, 2004; Nyssens, 2007; Defourny et al., 2014). Parallelisms can be found between these characteristics and those from the studies on the governance of Commons-Based Peer Production (CBPP) collectives (e.g. Fuster Morell et al., 2016; Arvidsson et al., 2017; Rozas, 2017). Firstly, we identify connections between the governance of SE and previously studied CBPP collectives, focussing on the similar challenges faced by these two types of collectives when aiming to scale up their governance processes. Secondly, we discuss the potentialities and limitations of blockchain technologies — a distributed and append-only ledger which enables the implementation of novel properties at an infrastructural level in a fully decentralised manner — to create conditions which may facilitate the scaling up of governance processes in SE collectives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the identified affordances, which emerged by bringing together literature on the governance of commons within that of blockchain-based governance, can be employed as analytical categories (e.g., Rozas, 2020; Rozas, Díaz-Molina, 2019) to co-design blockchain-based tools to facilitate cooperation and foster CBPP practices.”
From When Ostrom Meets Blockchain: Exploring the Potentials of Blockchain for Commons Governance (2021) · cites this paper as Rozas, Díaz-Molina, 2019
In the citing paper
“In fact, there are already applications of this study which go beyond its theoretical contributions.”
From When Ostrom Meets Blockchain: Exploring the Potentials of Blockchain for Commons Governance (2021) · cites this paper as Rozas & Díaz-Molina, 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Blockchain technology and decentralized governance: is the state still necessary?
Atzori, M. (2016) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2709713 · Cited by 506
When Ostrom Meets Blockchain: Exploring the Potentials of Blockchain for Commons Governance
Rozas, D., Tenorio-Fornés, A., Díaz-Molina, S., & Hassan, S. (2021) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211002526 · Cited by 206
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- A ? Arvidsson, 2017, Commons based peer production in the information economy
- C Borzaga, 2004, The emergence of social enterprise?, 4, 10.4324/9780203164679 · DOI · Paper page
- J Defourny, 2014, ? Social enterprise and the third sector: Changing European landscapes in a comparative perspective?, 10.4324/9780203487747 · doi:10.4324/9780203487747
- M ? Fuster Morell, 2016, Debate About the Concept of Value in Commons-Based Peer Production, ? Banking Beyond Banks and Money?, 9934, 121
- G Hardin, 1968, The tragedy of the commons, ? Science? , ?, 162, 1243, 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 · DOI · Paper page
- R ? Nogales Muriel, 2017, Social transformation and social innovation in the field of culture: The case of the SMart model and its adaptation across Europe (Doctoral dissertation
- M Nyssens, 2007, ? Social enterprise: At the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society?, 10.4324/9780203946909 · doi:10.4324/9780203946909
- E Ostrom, 1990, ? Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action?, 10.1017/CBO9780511807763 · DOI · Paper page
- D ? Rozas, 2017, Self-organisation in Commons-Based Peer Production. Drupal:" the drop is always moving
- M Swan, 2015, ? Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy?
Cited by
When Ostrom Meets Blockchain: Exploring the Potentials of Blockchain for Commons Governance
Rozas, D., Tenorio-Fornés, A., Díaz-Molina, S., & Hassan, S. (2021) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211002526 · Cited by 206
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rozas, D., & Díaz-Molina, S.
- ORCID
- Rozas, David
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 2
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Potentialities and Limitations of Blockchain Technologies in the Governance of Social Enterprise Collectives: The Case of Smart Ibérica. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2139/ssrn.3346561
- The paper
- Rozas, D., & Díaz-Molina, S. (2019). Potentialities and Limitations of Blockchain Technologies in the Governance of Social Enterprise Collectives: The Case of Smart Ibérica. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3346561
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
