Cited by 69Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyCriminal Law and Policy

Expungement of Criminal Convictions: An Empirical Study

Open access
Prescott, J.J., Starr, Sonja B.·2019·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3353620

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Applied not only to data but also to software, FAIR principles ensure reproducibility by making workflows, tools, and dependencies openly accessible.

    “Applied not only to data but also to software, they ensure reproducibility by making workflows, tools, and dependencies openly accessible [27,110].”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prescott, J. J., & Starr, S. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Starr, Sonja B.
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019
Volume
133
Issue
8
Pages
2460-2555
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121221183
Cited by
69
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • eYLS (Yale Law School) (submittedVersion)
  • bepress Legal Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Harvard Law Review
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • College of Engineering, Michigan State University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
Keywords
criminal justice reform, recidivism, public safety, employment effects, wage trajectories, employment trajectories, Michigan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review