The Ethics of AI in Biomedical Research, Patient Care and Public Health
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The use of AI holds substantial promise in enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of distributing limited medical resources.
“In the critical area of resource allocation within health care, the use of AI holds substantial promise in enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of distributing limited medical resources [63].”
From Proposing a Principle-Based Approach for Teaching AI Ethics in Medical Education (2024) · cites this paper as [63]
Cites
Policies designed for drugs won’t work for AI
Smallman, M. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-019-00737-2 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial intelligence for good health: a scoping review of the ethics literature.
Murphy, K., Di Ruggiero, E., Upshur, R., Willison, D. J., Malhotra, N., Cai, J. C., Malhotra, N., Lui, V., & Gibson, J. (2021) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-021-00577-8 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Explainable, trustworthy, and ethical machine learning for healthcare: A survey
Rasheed, K., Qayyum, A., Ghaly, M., Al-Fuqaha, A., Razi, A., & Qadir, J. (2022) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106043 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
A fairer way forward for AI in health care
Nordling, L. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-019-02872-2 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Proposing a Principle-Based Approach for Teaching AI Ethics in Medical Education
Weidener, L., & Fischer, M. (2024) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/55368 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
- Authors
- Blasimme, A., & Vayena, E.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 703-718
- ISSN
- 1556-5068
- OpenAlex
- W3121892092
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Keywords
- AI ethics, artificial intelligence in healthcare, biomedical research ethics, systemic governance, research ethics committees, clinical validation of AI, public health, disease surveillance, health promotion, regulatory framework, reflexivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
