Explainable, trustworthy, and ethical machine learning for healthcare: A survey
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
With the advent of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) empowered applications for critical applications like healthcare, the questions about liability, trust, and interpretability of their outputs are raising. The black-box nature of various DL models is a roadblock to clinical utilization. Therefore, to gain the trust of clinicians and patients, we need to provide explanations about the decisions of models. With the promise of enhancing the trust and transparency of black-box models, researchers are in the phase of maturing the field of eXplainable ML (XML). In this paper, we provided a comprehensive review of explainable and interpretable ML techniques for various healthcare applications. Along with highlighting security, safety, and robustness challenges that hinder the trustworthiness of ML, we also discussed the ethical issues arising because of the use of ML/DL for healthcare. We also describe how explainable and trustworthy ML can resolve all these ethical problems. Finally, we elaborate on the limitations of existing approaches and highlight various open research problems that require further development.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This survey reviews explainable, trustworthy, and ethical machine learning for healthcare, covering XML methods, security/robustness challenges, and bioethical issues. It proposes a development-to-deployment pipeline and argues explainability is needed to build clinician/patient trust and address ethical/legal requirements.
Key findings
- The survey distinguishes explainability from interpretability, taxonomizes XML into intrinsic/post-hoc, model-specific/agnostic, surrogate, and visualization methods, and reviews healthcare applications of DT, rule-lists, RF, GAM, PDP, CAM/GradCAM, LRP, LIME, DeepLIFT, SHAP, SA, GBP, IG, AM, HSCNN, P2V, and EMANet.
- It proposes a pipeline from development to deployment: data explication, data annotation, feature extraction, black-box or inherently explainable model, XML method, validation, clinical validation, and clinical implementation.
- It identifies trustworthiness barriers including adversarial attacks, privacy breaches, distribution shifts, data imperfections, and a trade-off among accuracy, explainability, and robustness; it cites a study of 18 ImageNet classifiers showing an accuracy–robustness trade-off.
- Ethical review covers principlism (beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, justice; explicability added for AI) and concerns such as imbalanced data, data bias, privacy, informed consent, and care ethics; examples include the Google Health breast cancer study accused of transparency/reproducibility violations and racial bias in healthcare spending data.
Methods
- Design: narrative survey/review of explainable, trustworthy, and ethical ML for healthcare, with comparison tables of prior surveys and XML methods.
- Data/sample: published literature and cited healthcare ML/XML studies; no primary dataset or new empirical experiment.
- Analysis: thematic synthesis of XML techniques, security/safety/robustness issues, ethical frameworks, pitfalls, and future research directions.
Limitations
- Paper-stated limitations of existing approaches: no formal definitions, lack of standardized representation and requirements, inadequate validation metrics, lack of theoretical understanding and causality, ethical constraints, and security challenges; pitfalls include explanations vulnerable to input changes, sub-optimal explanations, dependence on data/model, unclear accountability, and need for rigorous evaluation.
- Evident: as a survey, it does not conduct a systematic search protocol, meta-analysis, or primary validation; the ethics review is explicitly selective because “Due to space availability, we will not be able to provide a comprehensive review of all the relevant publications.”
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 77 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
There is no review that covers explainable and trustworthy ML topics in-depth while highlighting their link and applications for the medical domain.
“To the best of our knowledge, there is no review that covers these topics in-depth while highlighting the link and applications of explainable and trustworthy methods for the medical domain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The black-box nature of DL is a major challenge in developing trustworthiness.
“In addition, this black-box nature of the DL is yet a major challenge in developing trustworthiness [25].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Gille, 2020, What we talk about when we talk about trust: Theory of trust for AI in healthcare, Intell.-Based Med.
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The current field of medical XML lacks requirement guidelines about designing, measuring, and testing explanations.
“The current field of medical XML lacks requirement guidelines about designing, measuring, and testing explanations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Wierzynski, 2018, The challenges and opportunities of explainable AI, Intel. Com
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
There is no measure to check which explanations should be preferred from different explanations produced by the same method.
“Also, there is no measure to check which explanations should be preferred from the different explanations produced by the same method [24].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Gilpin, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Many recent studies have highlighted vulnerabilities of DL-based systems towards adversarial ML attacks.
“many recent studies have highlighted the vulnerabilities of these systems towards adversarial ML attacks [30].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Szegedy, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Due to the unavailability of sound fundamental laws and models, the explanation of DL cannot be produced up to the required scale.
“However, due to the unavailability of sound fundamental laws and models, the explanation of DL cannot be produced up-to the required scale.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Begoli, 2019, The need for uncertainty quantification in machine-assisted medical decision making, Nat. Mach. Intell. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Entrusting the decisions of black-box systems that are not explainable can be life-threatening.
“entrusting the decisions of black-box systems that are not explainable can be life-threatening [9]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Holzinger, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Data leakage can mislead model learning and testing.
“Similar is the case for data leakage, which can mislead the model learning and testing [49].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] Robnik-Šikonja, 2018, Perturbation-based explanations of prediction models
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
ML and XML algorithms are designed to aid medical staff, not for replacing medical experts.
“ML and XML algorithms are designed to aid the medical staff, not for replacing the medical experts [45].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Kaufman, 2012, Leakage in data mining: Formulation, detection, and avoidance, ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Medical experts may be unable to understand explained risk factors and estimated probabilistic explanations.
“Also, there is a possibility that the medical experts may be unable to understand the explained risk factors and estimated probabilistic explanations [20].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Jeffery, 2017, Participatory design of probability-based decision support tools for in-hospital nurses, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Adversarial ML attacks have already been realized on ML/DL-based medical systems.
“Moreover, such attacks have been already realized on ML/DL-based medical systems [31].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Finlayson, 2019, Adversarial attacks on medical machine learning, Science source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
The lack of transparency of ML techniques, particularly deep learning, is a key challenge that hinders practical deployment into critical applications like healthcare.
“The lack of transparency of ML techniques, particularly DL is yet another key challenge that hinders the practical deployment of these methods into critical applications like healthcare.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Deep neural networks, convolutional neural networks, and recurrent neural networks are widely employed for healthcare applications.
“With advanced DL techniques, deep neural networks (DNNs), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and recurrent neural networks are widely employed for healthcare applications, i.e., epilepsy seizure prediction [52], segmentation of brain tumor [53], Alzheimer detection [54], genomics [55], and medical prescriptions [56].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [52] Islam, 2017, A novel deep learning based multi-class classification method for Alzheimer’s disease detection using brain MRI data
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [53] Zou, 2019, A primer on deep learning in genomics, Nature Genet. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [54] Rong, 2022, Chinese medicine prescription recommendation using generative adversarial network, IEEE Access source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Adversarial ML attacks have been shown to be a real threat to the clinical deployment of ML/DL models.
“In recent years, adversarial ML attacks have been shown to be a real threat to the clinical deployment of ML/DL models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [69] Paschali, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Vulnerabilities in ML systems can be exploited by adversaries for misleading the AI-empowered system to get desired outcomes.
“Such vulnerabilities can be exploited by adversaries for misleading the AI-empowered system to get desired outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
These three methods performed better in PD diagnosis by correctly analyzing the absorption of 123 I-Ioflupane in the dopamine depletion region of SPECT of PD patients.
“These three methods performed better in PD diagnosis by correctly analyzing the absorption of 123 I-Ioflupane in the dopamine depletion region of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) of PD patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [114] Kitamura, 2020, Deep learning could diagnose diabetic nephropathy with renal pathological immunofluorescent images, Diagnostics source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
DeepLIFT and SHAP produced second best explanations by distinguishing between features of healthy and PD patients.
“DeepLIFT and SHAP produced second best explanations by distinguishing between features of healthy and PD patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [114] Kitamura, 2020, Deep learning could diagnose diabetic nephropathy with renal pathological immunofluorescent images, Diagnostics source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
GBP produced best explanations among all other methods for Parkinson's disease detection.
“The GBP produced best explanations among all other methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [114] Kitamura, 2020, Deep learning could diagnose diabetic nephropathy with renal pathological immunofluorescent images, Diagnostics source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
IG can identify structural elements from classified drugs using CNN.
“Preuer et al. [120] demonstrated that IG can identify these elements from the classified drug using CNN.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [120] C.-H. Chang, S. Tan, B. Lengerich, A. Goldenberg, R. Caruana, How interpretable and trustworthy are gams? in: Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, 2021, pp. 95–105. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Fewer healthcare facilities are provided in rural areas and under-developing countries.
“Similar is the case for geographical biases, where fewer healthcare facilities are provided in rural areas and under-developing countries [156].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [156] Blasimme, 2019, The ethics of AI in biomedical research, patient care and public health
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Incorporating ML techniques into the healthcare system raises serious ethical challenges and complex questions.
“However, incorporating the ML techniques into the healthcare system also raises serious ethical challenges and complex questions that need to be seriously considered in order to make a robust and well-balanced assessment of possible benefits and expected harms [125].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [125] Yu, 2020, Copy number variation in plasma as a tool for lung cancer prediction using Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) classifier, Thorac. Cancer source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Training a model on imbalanced data results in outcomes biased to certain categories.
“Training the model on such imbalanced data results in outcomes that are biased to certain categories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
This bias causes ML models to show more precision for males in contrast to females.
“This bias causes ML models to show more precision for males in contrast to females.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Dependence of models' learning on skin-tone, face structure, or nationality is problematic for healthcare applications.
“Dependence of models' learning on the skin-tone, face structure, or nationality is problematic for healthcare applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Biases in data lead to biased outcomes.
“Other than the biased outcomes due to class imbalance, the biases in data also lead to biased outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Healthcare datasets are mostly biased towards males because clinical trials held for collecting the data have large data samples of male patients.
“The healthcare datasets are mostly biased towards males because clinical trials held for collecting the data have large data samples of male patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Researchers developing algorithms can also be responsible for bad decisions.
“Researchers developing the algorithms can also be responsible for bad decisions [174].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [174] Donath, 2020, Ethical issues in our relationship with artificial entities
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
SHAP explanations to class probability did not improve human decision-making in alert processing tasks.
“They showed that SHAP explanations to class probability did not improve the decision-making.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [171] Lee, 2012, Ethical justification for conducting public health surveillance without patient consent, Am J Public Health source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Label leakage can arise in subtle ways, for example an algorithm may learn inherent noise instead of diagnostic parameters.
“Label leakage can possibly arise in subtle ways, e.g., an algorithm may learn the inherent noise instead of learning the diagnostic parameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Explanations generated by some gradient-based methods are dependent on the model architecture and data generation procedure.
“The literature suggests that explanations generated by some gradient-based methods are dependent on the model architecture and data generation procedure [173].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [173] Mittelstadt, 2017, Ethics of the health-related internet of things: a narrative review, Ethics Inf. Technol. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
LIME highlights some attributions that are irrelevant to explanations produced by human experts.
“Their results showed that LIME highlights some attributions which were irrelevant to the explanations produced by humans.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [172] Wu, 2015, The ethics (or not) of massive government surveillance
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Explanation methods for ML/DL models are vulnerable to input changes, with small input changes causing large fluctuations in explanations.
“However, it has been shown in the literature that the explanation methods are vulnerable to input changes.”
- Also stated in: § A. Vulnerability to Input Changes · boosted
“Ghorbani et al. [169] demonstrated that a small change in the input sample caused large fluctuations in the output representations generated by XML.”
- Also stated in: § C. Generalized Explanations · hedged
“As discussed in Section VI, the explanations produced by the data-dependent explanation models are vulnerable to the change in inputs and may vary from patient to patient and even for the same patient for same disease.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [169] Voigt, 2017, The eu general data protection regulation (gdpr)
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § A. Vulnerability to Input Changes · boosted
- Premisecitation
Silent mode testing can be effective for identifying errors in real-time settings.
“The silent mode testing can be effective for identifying the errors in the real-time settings [177].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [177] A. Ghorbani, A. Abid, J. Zou, Interpretation of neural networks is fragile, in: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33, 2019, pp. 3681–3688. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
According to GDPR rules, it is the right of an individual to understand why the model is taking a specific decision and the underlying mechanism of decisions concerning the individual.
“According to the GDPR rules, it is the right of an individual to understand why the model is taking a specific decision and the underlying mechanism of decisions concerning the individual.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This step limits the implementation of ML models for clinical applications because of the use of patient data.
“This step limits the implementation of ML models for clinical applications because of the use of patient data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The black-box nature of ML models is a serious obstacle to obtaining necessary informed consent from patients.
“The black-box nature of ML models, as outlined in this paper, is a serious obstacle to get the necessary informed consent from the patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It is not guaranteed that data collected for a specific objective will always be used for the same purpose.
“However, it is also not guaranteed that the data collected for a specific objective will always be used for the same purpose.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Presence of subtle biases in medical data decreases model reliability, especially when they are not corrected during model development.
“The presence of these subtle biases in medical data decreases model reliability, especially when they are not corrected during model development [180], [181].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [180], [181]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The GDPR has introduced rules for decisions and methods based on data-driven approaches to provide an ethical framework.
“To address this concern, the general data protection regulation (GDPR) has introduced rules for the decisions and methods based on data-driven approaches to provide an ethical framework [161].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [161] Obermeyer, 2019, Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations, Science source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
It is not evident that these explanations are the optimal requirement of medical experts.
“However, it is not evident that these explanations are the optimal requirement of the medical experts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Data can be used for any other purpose by doing slight changes.
“As it has been shown, the data can be used for any other purpose by doing slight changes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Due to the black-box nature of ML models, neither the patient nor the clinician will be able to understand the rationale behind conclusions or recommendations made by AI technologies.
“Due to this black-box nature, neither the patient nor even the clinician will be able to understand the rationale behind the conclusions or recommendations made by the AI technologies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
DL-based methods have provided state-of-the-art performance in many medical image analysis tasks.
“In this regard, researchers are developing learning-based methods using such large-scale datasets, particularly, DL-based methods have provided the state-of-the-art performance in many medical image analysis tasks [168].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [168] Mittelstadt, 2014, The ethical implications of personal health monitoring, Int. J. Technoethics source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Merging datasets of two different experiments can be used for modeling a third type of experiment.
“Additionally, merging datasets of two different experiments can be used for the modeling of a third type of experiment [164].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [164] Arpey, 2017, How socioeconomic status affects patient perceptions of health care: a qualitative study, J. Prim. Care Community Health source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Some non-principlist approaches can provide fresh insights for some ethical questions triggered by AI/ML-based healthcare systems.
“Some of these non-principlist approaches can provide fresh insights for some of the ethical questions triggered by AI/ML-based healthcare systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 99
- May combine two claims. 36
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenFew researchers have focused on the problem of evaluating explainable machine learning (XML).
“Despite the increasing research on the said topic, few researchers focused on the problem of evaluating XML.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDL models have a black-box nature and lack an underlying theoretical foundation behind their decisions.
“However, these models have black-box nature and lack underlying theoretical foundation behind their decisions [8]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Begoli, 2019, The need for uncertainty quantification in machine-assisted medical decision making, Nat. Mach. Intell. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe human-machine combination is a powerful tool to facilitate patients and develop high-quality treatments.
“This human-machine combination is a powerful tool to facilitate the patients and develop high-quality treatments [21].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] M.A. Ahmad, C. Eckert, A. Teredesai, Interpretable machine learning in healthcare, in: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics, 2018, pp. 559–560. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationExplainable techniques allow researchers or end-users to get involved in improving the performance of the algorithm and to trust the prediction results.
“The explainable techniques allow the researchers or end-users to get involved in improving the performance of the algorithm and to trust the prediction results [44].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] Caruana, 2015, Intelligible models for HealthCare: Predicting pneumonia risk and hospital 30-day readmission
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationExplanations of ML systems can help improve prescribed medicines, facilities provided to patients in hospitals, and health monitoring systems.
“These insights can help improve the prescribed medicines, facilities provided to patients in hospitals [46], and health monitoring systems [47].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [46] Guidotti, 2018, A survey of methods for explaining black box models, ACM Comput. Surv. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [47] Doshi-Velez, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEvaluation of explanations is a complicated task because explainability is non-monolithic and subjective.
“Due to the non-monolithic concept and subjective nature of explainability, evaluation of explanations is a complicated task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenFunction-based evaluation does not require humans in the loop and works appropriately when human-based or application-based evaluations have already been performed.
“This approach does not require humans in the loop (layperson or domain expert).It works appropriately when human-based or application-based evaluations have already been performed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBlack-box methodology provides local explanations of a model for a prediction.
“The blackbox methodology provides local explanations of a model for a prediction [41].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] Chen, 2021, Ethical machine learning in healthcare, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Data Sci. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenHuman-based evaluation does not require a costly experimental environment and domain expert for testing.
“However, the difference is that it does not require a costly experimental environment and domain expert for testing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenAn XML technique usually explains in a human-understandable way how features of data relate to prediction results.
“An XML technique usually explains in a human-understandable way how the feature of data relates to prediction results, i.e., what features of X-ray images a model learns to detect the fractures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenExplainability of black-box models is required to attain fair and trustworthy healthcare decisions.
“It is now evident that the explainability of black-box models is required to attain fair and trustworthy healthcare decisions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenLow translucency has the advantage of more compact explanation results.
“Low translucency has the advantage of more compact explanation results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningApplication-based evaluation helps in evaluating an explanation in real-time practical scenarios.
“This technique helps in evaluating the explanation in real-time practical scenarios.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe properties of good quality XML methods are mostly required for explanations of any black-box model.
“These properties are mostly required for explanations of any black-box model, however, we are describing these in terms of healthcare domain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] Işın, 2016, Review of MRI-based brain tumor image segmentation using deep learning methods, Procedia Comput. Sci. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRobnik et al. listed properties of a good quality XML method.
“Robnik et al. [51] listed some properties of good quality XML method.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] Işın, 2016, Review of MRI-based brain tumor image segmentation using deep learning methods, Procedia Comput. Sci. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationModel-based explanation methods are well developed and implemented for healthcare applications.
“The model-based explanation methods are well developed and implemented for healthcare applications (further discussed in Sec IV-D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Rasheed, 2020, Machine learning for predicting epileptic seizures using EEG signals: A review, IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMedical end-users likely do not have enough knowledge to understand complex mathematical explanations, so rule-based, textual, or visualization-based explanations are required for them.
“For end-users of the medical field, i.e., clinicians, radiologists, pathologists, neurologists, and patients, it is more likely that they do not have enough knowledge of understanding complex mathematical explanations.So, for them, rulebased, textual, or visualization-based explanations are required.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningHuman-based evaluation can be tested with laypersons and helps generalize findings because more testers are easily available.
“One can test the explanations with laypersons, and it helps to generalize the findings as the more number of testers (laypersons) are easily available.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningHigh translucency allows the explanation method to gather information from more internal parameters of a model.
“High translucency allows the explanation method to gather information from more internal parameters of a model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationExplanation provides a fair analysis of model architecture and learned parameters.
“Thus, the explanation provides a fair analysis of model architecture and learned parameters [42].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] Levin, 2021, Machine-learning-based hospital discharge predictions can support multidisciplinary rounds and decrease hospital length-of-stay, BMJ Innov. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenDomain adaptable outputs concern how an explainable model represents its explanation according to the application domain and end-users.
“It is how an explainable model represents its explanation according to the application domain and end-users.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenTranslucency of XML represents how much the explaining method depends on the internal architecture of the ML model.
“It represents how much the explaining method depends on the internal architecture of the ML model, i.e., learnable parameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: There is no definite method to calculate the properties of good quality XML methods.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe signal method is used to highlight the patterns of data that activate the neurons of higher layers by back-propagating a signal from the last layer of the network to the input layer.
“The signal method is used to highlight the patterns of data that activate the neurons of higher layers.This can be done by back-propagating a signal from the last layer of the network to the input layer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFor a generalized model for clinical use, low translucency is desirable; for a patient-specific application, the explanation should be more detailed and accurate, leading towards high translucency.
“To get a generalized model for clinical use low translucency is desirable and for a patient-specific application, the explanation should be more detailed and accurate that can lead towards high translucency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenAdoptability illustrates the variety of ML methods for which an explanation technique can be applied.
“It illustrates the variety of ML methods for which an explanation technique can be applied.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenA good explanation should be accurate especially in disease prediction; low accuracy is acceptable if the performance of the ML model is also low.
“A good explanation should be accurate specially in case of disease prediction.Low value of accuracy is acceptable if the performance of ML model is also low.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLIME's local explanation allows the end-user to determine which feature is important for the precise prediction and how perturbation in a feature affects the prediction results.
“This local explanation allows the end-user to determine which feature is important for the precise prediction and how the perturbation in feature affects the prediction results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] Samek, 2021, Explaining deep neural networks and beyond: A review of methods and applications, Proc. IEEE source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDeep learning techniques are precise in terms of performance but their decisions are difficult to explain because of their complex model architecture.
“These techniques are precise in terms of performance but their decisions are difficult to explain because of their complex model architecture.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenSaliency methods and feature attribution are the two broad categories of methods applied for explanation of deep learning models.
“Saliency methods and feature attribution (FA) are the two broad categories of methods applied for explanation of DL models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenFidelity is a property of explanation that shows the precision of approximating the decision of an ML method.
“Fidelity is a property of explanation that shows the precision of approximating the decision of ML method.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningExplanation methods of complex deep neural networks have high translucency and thus cannot be applicable for other models.
“Explanation methods of complex deep neural networks (DNN) have high translucency thus can not be applicable for other models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenSaliency methods produce the explanation by presenting important feature maps of each data sample.
“Saliency methods produce the explanation by presenting important feature maps of each data sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSamek et al. showed that heatmaps produced by sensitivity analysis are much more noisy compared to heatmaps generated using layer-wise relevance propagation.
“They showed that the heatmaps produced by SA are much more noisy compared to the heatmaps generated using LRP [65].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] Bohlin, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningGradient-based saliency methods reveal how the output of the model changes with a small change in the input and are computationally efficient because of a single pass of input through the network.
“Gradient-based saliency methods reveal how the output of the model changes with a small change in the input.These methods are computationally efficient because of a single pass of input (forward and backward) through the network.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIt is crucial for a typical ML/DL empowered healthcare system to be fully trusted by both clinicians and patients for getting the real impact of such systems.
“It is crucial for a typical ML/DL empowered healthcare system to be fully trusted by both the clinicians and patients for getting the real impact of such systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLIME produces an explanation list that shows the contribution of individual features to the prediction.
“LIME produces an explanation list that shows the contribution of individual features to the prediction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] Samek, 2021, Explaining deep neural networks and beyond: A review of methods and applications, Proc. IEEE source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe OECD and European Commission's AI High-Level Expert Group principles can be used for sustaining trust and trustworthiness in AI.
“The literature refers to two sets of popular principles that have been outlined by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) [67] and European Commission's AI High-Level Expert Group (HLEG) [68] that can be used for sustaining trust and trustworthiness in AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [67] Holzinger, 2022, Information fusion as an integrative cross-cutting enabler to achieve robust, explainable, and trustworthy medical artificial intelligence, Inf. Fusion source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [68] Mirsky, 2019, CT-GAN: Malicious tampering of 3D medical imagery using deep learning
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningTechniques with low translucency are applicable to a wide range of ML methods.
“The techniques with low translucency are applicable to a wide range of ML methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe feature attribution method decomposes each value produced from each neuron of the output layer according to the contributions made by the individual dimensions of an input sample.
“The feature attribution method decomposes each value produced from each neuron of the output layer according to the contributions made by the individual dimensions of an input sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA high concentration of cfDNA in plasma and CNV in chromosomes affected the pathogenesis of cancer cases.
“They concluded that a high concentration of cfDNA in plasma and CNV in chromosomes affected the pathogenesis of cancer cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [118] Bengio, 2010, Decision trees do not generalize to new variations, Comput. Intell. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIntraoperative urine output, IV fluid infusion, blood product transfusion, and dynamic changes of hemodynamic features are significant causes of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury.
“Using SHAP values they described that the intraoperative urine output, IV fluid infusion, blood product transfusion, and dynamic changes of hemodynamic features are significant causes of injury.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [113] Palatnik de Sousa, 2019, Local interpretable model-agnostic explanations for classification of lymph node metastases, Sensors source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCNN learned the patterns of peripheral lesion of DN glomeruli for DN detection.
“They analyzed the decision of CNN using LIME and described that CNN learned the patterns of peripheral lesion of DN glomeruli for DN detection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [112] Jo, 2020, Deep learning detection of informative features in tau PET for Alzheimer’s disease classification, BMC Bioinformatics
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenAdversarial robustness can be defined as the survivability of ML-based systems to adversarial attacks.
“The adversarial robustness can be defined as the survivability of ML-based systems to adversarial attacks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThese factors were not revealed using traditional techniques.
“They also stated that these factors were not revealed using traditional techniques.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [113] Palatnik de Sousa, 2019, Local interpretable model-agnostic explanations for classification of lymph node metastases, Sensors source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDLIME shows better results than LIME.
“They concluded that the DLIME shows better results than LIME.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [116] Pianpanit, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe majority of the guidelines in both the OECD and HLEG frameworks mainly focus on robustness, safety, security, explainability, and fairness and are therefore key requirements for building trustworthy AI systems.
“It is worth noting that the majority of the guidelines in both aforementioned frameworks mainly focus on the AI aspects of robustness, safety, security, explainability, and fairness and are therefore the key requirements for building trustworthy AI systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [67] Holzinger, 2022, Information fusion as an integrative cross-cutting enabler to achieve robust, explainable, and trustworthy medical artificial intelligence, Inf. Fusion source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [68] Mirsky, 2019, CT-GAN: Malicious tampering of 3D medical imagery using deep learning
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe robustness of ML/DL models is defined along three dimensions: robustness to security threats, robustness to distribution shifts, and data imperfections.
“The safe and robust ML is a broad term and we define the robustness of the ML/DL models along three dimensions, i.e., robustness to security threats, robustness to distribution shifts, and data imperfections.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationInstability of generated explanations due to perturbation addition and random feature selection is a problem in medical computer-aided diagnosis systems.
“Zafar et al. [116] pointed out the problem of instability of generated explanations due to perturbation addition and random feature selection in the medical computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [116] Pianpanit, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningTrustworthy ML can only be possible by addressing challenges related to privacy, fairness, explainability, security, and robustness.
“From the figure, it is evident that the trustworthy ML can only be possible by addressing challenges related to privacy, fairness, explainability, security, and robustness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationML systems are not safe, secure, and robust.
“The literature suggests that ML systems are not safe, secure, and robust.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Qayyum, 2021, Secure and robust machine learning for healthcare: A survey, IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationImplementation of P2V improves predictive model working efficiency and increases explainability.
“The implementation of P2V improves the predictive model working efficiency and also increase the explainability of these models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [122] H. Jung, Y. Oh, Towards better explanations of class activation mapping, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021, pp. 1336–1344. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenIG works on two axioms: sensitivity and implementation variance.
“This algorithm works on two axioms sensitivity and implementation variance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenTo resolve the problem of toxic drugs, a chemist needs the structural element causing the problem.
“To resolve the problem of toxic drugs a chemist need the structural element which is causing the problem.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIG does not require any changes to the primordial deep neural network.
“IG does not require any changes to the primordial deep neural network.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHSCNN out-performed CNN with a high prediction score and explainable results.
“They also compared the performance of their proposed model with CNN and concluded that the HSCNN out-performed the CNN with a high prediction score and explainable results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [121] Guisan, 2002, Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene, Ecol. Model. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIG can be implemented for any kind of model, i.e., image.
“IG can be implemented for any kind of model, i.e., image.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningIn drug development, classification of toxic and non-toxic drugs is not enough.
“In the drug development classification of toxic and non-toxic drugs is not enough.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIf the model outcome has changed notably with perturbations, it shows that the feature has a high contribution to the prediction.
“If the model outcome has changed notably with perturbations, it shows us that the feature has a high contribution to the prediction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe network is sensitive to intensity and sphericity in coherence with domain information.
“They showed that the network is sensitive to intensity and sphericity in coherence with domain information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [119] Mohnen, 2020, Healthcare expenditure prediction with neighbourhood variables–A random forest model, Stat. Politics Policy source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHIPAA act assures the privacy of the medical data of patients.
“For example, the health insurance and portability and accountability (HIPAA) act assures the privacy of the medical data of patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [157] Panesar, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenML algorithms require access to as much data as possible to improve the precision and accuracy of the outcome.
“However, ML algorithms requires access to as much data as possible to improve the precision and accuracy of the outcome.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenML-based healthcare products are manufactured by Western companies and developed and tested on Caucasian data.
“Another problem is that ML-based healthcare products are manufactured by Western companies and these products are developed and tested on Caucasian data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningExplanation of data is required to check for these biases.
“Explanation of the data, as we proposed in the pipeline of explainable ML presented in Figure 3, in the first place is required to check for these biases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe quality of training data has a high impact on the performance of ML algorithms.
“Against this background, the quality of training data has a high impact on the performance of ML algorithms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenImbalance class data is one of the common data-related problems in supervised training of ML/DL models.
“Imbalance class data is one of the common data-related problems that occur in the supervised training of ML/DL models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThis bias in the availability of facilities is reflected in the data and can cause biased decisions of ML algorithms.
“This bias in the availability of facilities is also reflected in the data and can cause the biased decision of ML algorithms [155].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [155] Bohr, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenMore healthcare facilities are available for wealthy people, making it less likely that low-income people are able to access advanced technological treatments.
“It is a common practice that more healthcare facilities are available for wealthy people which makes it less likely that low-income people are able to access advanced technological treatments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAI/ML can improve care quality, cut overall costs, reduce or eliminate diagnostic errors, and improve the process of predicting disease.
“it can improve care quality, cut the overall costs, reduce or even eliminate diagnostic errors and improve the process of predicting disease.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenML models learn the latent variable of data to deduce predictions.
“ML models learn the latent variable of data to deduce the predictions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenProtecting the privacy of patients and the confidentiality of their data is one of the fundamentals of ethical healthcare.
“Protecting the privacy of patients and the confidentiality of their data is one of the fundamentals of ethical healthcare.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHIPAA's policy standards are designed to improve the healthcare systems and mandate all healthcare organizations to protect medical information.
“HIPAA's policy standards are designed to improve the healthcare systems and mandate it for all healthcare organizations to protect medical information [157].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [157] Panesar, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIntegration of AI/ML into healthcare practice and clinical applications promises to provide substantial improvements to the healthcare sector.
“The integration of AI/ML into healthcare practice and clinical applications promises to provide substantial improvements to the healthcare sector.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenImbalance class data arises due to nonuniform distribution of samples among classes.
“This problem arises due to the nonuniform distribution of samples among classes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenBiases in outcomes of models used for healthcare services may have profound consequences.
“Biases in outcomes of models used for healthcare services may have profound consequences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationExplicability is a newly proposed principle within the particular AI context.
“It is to be noted here that explicability is a newly proposed principle, within the particular AI context, which has the same meaning outlined above in this paper [127].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [127] Preuer, 2019, Interpretable deep learning in drug discovery
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTo achieve the potential of deep medicine, the scope of the to-be collected data should be wide enough to include speech, the intonation of voice, reaction times from keyboard use, GPS data, social media usage, and distinctive facial attributes in one's selfies.
“To achieve the potential of”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [144] Association, 2001, World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, Bull. World Health Organ.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [146] Berner, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe amount and type of needed data are increasing by time to the extent of seriously blurring the boundaries between what is medical and what is personal.
“The amount and type of the needed data are increasing by time to the extent of seriously blurring the boundaries between what is”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEAMNet can detect diseases and show transparency by highlighting the affected area.
“The proposed architecture not only able to detect the diseases but also show transparency by highlighting the affected area detected by the system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [123] Zafar, 2021, Deterministic local interpretable model-agnostic explanations for stable explainability, Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extract. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBias in medical data is a major challenge and can eventually lead to algorithmic bias.
“In addition, bias in the data is also a major challenge to handle and that can eventually lead to algorithmic bias [178].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [178] Wang, 2019, Bias also matters: Bias attribution for deep neural network explanation
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningConducting proper analysis for all these data would necessitate giving access not only to one's physician but to many other experts in various areas.
“To make the situation more complex, conducting proper analysis for all these data would necessitate giving access not only to one's physician but to many other experts in various areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningVarious factors can put people's privacy at risk.
“Various factors can put people's privacy at risk, and we highlight here two of them: a) Unprotected Data Sharing:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTraditional statistical performance metrics like the area under the curve may not be sufficient for evaluating models making clinical decisions.
“Moreover, it has been argued in the literature that traditional statistical performance metrics like the area under the curve may not be sufficient for evaluating the models making clinical decisions [176].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [176] Anwar, 2018, Medical image analysis using convolutional neural networks: a review, J. Med. Syst. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenML techniques build their decisions on latent variables learned from data.
“ML techniques build their decisions on the latent variables which are learned from the data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIoT techniques are widely used in healthcare systems for real-time monitoring of critical patients.
“Techniques based on Internetof-Things (IoT) are widely used in healthcare systems for real-time monitoring of critical patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenWith advanced technologies, the records and reports of patients are converted into electronic health records (EHR).
“With the advanced technologies, the records and reports of patients are converted into electronic health records (EHR).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThis ability leads to data breaching through tracking and monitoring of patient's routines which dishonors the patients' privacy.
“However, this ability leads to data breaching through tracking and monitoring of patient's routines which dishonors the patients' privacy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenMedical data is one of the most difficult data to handle due to its complex, multi-variate, and sometimes non-stationary and scarce nature.
“Medical data is one of the most difficult data to handle due to its complex, multi-variate, and sometimes non-stationary and scarce nature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDependence of latent variables on each other can cause misleading patterns, and therefore ML-based decision-making will be misleading.
“The dependence of latent-variables on each other can cause misleading patterns and due to this issue, the ML-based decision-making will be misleading.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationInherent bias in medical input data, such as class imbalance, can be reflected in model outputs and can influence model explanations.
“In addition, the inherent bias in the input (medical) data (e.g., class imbalance) can be reflected in the model's outputs i.e., model might prefer a specific class as compared to other classes and this bias might influence the explanations of the model [170].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [170] Klingler, 2017, Ethical issues in public health surveillance: a systematic qualitative review, BMC Public Health source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThese records are available online via the cloud servers.
“These records are available online via the cloud servers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGradient-based explanations are dependent on the choice of reference point, and slight changes in the reference point significantly change the explanation, causing confusion and potentially misleading results.
“As these explanations are dependent on the choice of reference point and a slight change in the reference point of gradient will significantly change the explanation thus causing confusion that will eventually lead to misleading results or interpretation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe blame game around accountability will foster epistemic vices such as dogmatism or gullibility.
“This blame game will eventually foster”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [175] Weizenbaum, 1976
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenDespite their significant performance, these models are black-box and lack theoretical understanding behind their decisions.
“However, despite their significant performance these models are black-box and lack theoretical understanding behind their decisions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiases in medical data are hard to undo and their elimination has unintended consequences on results.
“These biases are hard to undo and their elimination have unintended consequences on the results [179].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [179] Weerts, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIt is well established that explanation of ML/DL techniques is required to gain the trust of clinicians in ML/DL empowered healthcare solutions.
“It is well established that the explanation of the ML/DL techniques is required to gain the trust of clinicians in ML/DL empowered healthcare solutions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Explanation of ML/DL techniques is required to gain the trust of clinicians in ML/DL empowered healthcare solutions.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA few studies suggested involving all types of stakeholders into the ML/DL method development process.
“In this regard, a few studies suggested involving all types of stakeholders into the ML/DL method development process that may include clinicians, policymakers, data scientists, ML researchers, and hospital staff, to name a few [182], [176].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [182], [176]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenVisualization-based methods are widely applied to explain the decisions of ML/DL methods.
“In the literature, visualization-based methods are widely applied to explain the decisions of ML/DL methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationReplacing human care with carebots will have social costs, for example exchanging feelings and emotions among humans will cease to be part of caregiving.
“Even if this automation of caregiving will not result in causing medical harm to the patient or job cuts in the healthcare staff, replacing human care will still have social costs, e.g., exchanging feelings and emotions among humans will cease to be part of caregiving [166].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [166] Atlam, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenExplanations of DL models are model-specific in nature.
“As we discussed in Section III, that the explanations of the DL models are model-specific in nature, therefore, it is also required to develop inherently explainable and generalize explainable methods for the DL algorithms in future.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe black-box nature of these models makes them susceptible to many vulnerabilities such as adversarial attacks, biased decisions, and inability to generalize out of distribution samples.
“Their black-box nature makes them susceptible to many vulnerabilities such as adversarial attacks, biased decisions, and being not able to generalize out of distribution samples, etc.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationML/DL methods can be easily fooled and desired outcomes can be obtained.
“Over the past few years, it has been shown that ML/DL methods can be easily fooled and desired outcomes can be obtained [30], [31].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30], [31]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningClinical impact of ML/DL advancements is only completely possible by overcoming challenges like adversarial ML attacks.
“Moreover, the clinical impact of ML/DL advancements is only completely possible by overcoming challenges like adversarial ML attacks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenDeveloped explanation methods have unique challenges and limitations.
“However, the developed explanation methods have unique challenges and limitations associated with them, which are described below.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe critical nature of healthcare applications provides significant motivation for malicious actors to defame ML/DL-based systems and get desired outcomes.
“The critical nature of healthcare applications provides significant motivation for the malicious actors to defame the ML/DL-based system and to get the desired outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA wide variety of adversarial ML attacks have already been proposed and research on developing respective defense methods is very limited.
“In the literature, a wide variety of adversarial ML attacks have been already proposed and the research on developing respective defense methods is very limited [73].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [73] Takabi, 2016, Privacy preserving multi-party machine learning with homomorphic encryption
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningSuch an interdisciplinary development workforce will enable collaboration between knowledge experts and healthcare service providers that will eventually improve productivity and outcomes.
“Such an interdisciplinary development workforce will enable collaboration between the knowledge experts (i.e., clinicians and ML researchers) and healthcare service providers that will eventually improve productivity and outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationObtaining informed consent from the patient before exposing him/her to any medical intervention is one practical application of these principles.
“Obtaining an informed consent from the patient before exposing him/her to any medical intervention is one of the practical applications of these principles [135].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [135] Miles, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenModern bioethics have other approaches besides principlism.
“As mentioned above, modern bioethics have other approaches besides principlism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBecause of the significance of addressing data-related concerns, different countries have developed policies and laws.
“Because of the particular significance of addressing the data-related concerns, different countries have developed policies and laws [160].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [160] Haibe-Kains, 2020, Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence, Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThere is no doubt that deployment of ML for clinical practice will aid clinicians.
“There is no doubt that the deployment of ML for clinical practice will aid the clinicians.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIssues discussed within the care ethics approach go beyond solely measuring efficacy and safety of applications or calculating their possible health-related benefits and harms.
“The issues that can be discussed within this approach go beyond the question of solely measuring the efficacy and safety of certain applications or calculating their possible healthrelated benefits and harms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe accountability situation becomes even more complex when all stakeholders in the loop are considered.
“This situation becomes even more complex when we consider all stakeholders in the loop.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAdvancements in ML/DL techniques have a great potential to revolutionize healthcare.
“The advancements in ML/DL techniques have a great potential to revolutionize healthcare.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Advancements in ML/DL techniques have a great potential to revolutionize healthcare.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLack of ethical guidelines and fewer or no proper training of surveillance programs raises ethical concerns.
“Lack of ethical guidelines and fewer or no proper training of such surveillance programs raises ethical concerns [162].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [162] West, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenRespect for persons and autonomy are among the widely-agreed upon principles in modern bioethics.
“As outlined above, the respect for persons and autonomy are among the widely-agreed upon principles in modern bioethics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe care ethics approach focuses on the domain of intimate human relationships rather than the abstract application of rules.
“The care ethics approach, which focuses on the domain of intimate human relationships rather than the abstract application of rules [135], serves as a good example in this regard.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [135] Miles, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenDue to the availability of implantable devices, it is now possible to monitor patients without their consent.
“Due to the availability of implantable devices, it is now possible to monitor the patients without their consent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenHCI is a well-developed technique to empower users.
“For example, humancomputer interaction (HCI) is a well-developed technique to empower users.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: HCI is a well-developed technique to empower users.
The paper relies on this without support.
DL models produce more accurate results than conventional ML techniques.
“These complex and dense DL models produce more accurate results than conventional ML techniques.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Simple ML is easy to explain with less accurate results and complex DL produce more accurate results with fewer explanations due to their complex non-linear structures.
“It is a well-known problem of XML that the simple ML is easy to explain with less accurate results and complex DL produce more accurate results with fewer explanations due to their complex non-linear structures.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is no consistency in the use of terms like feature relevance, feature importance, saliency maps, and heatmaps.
“There is also the need for defining terms like feature relevance, feature importance, saliency maps, heatmaps, etc.As there is no consistency in the use of these terms.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is not standardized whether radiologists or neurologists are interested in visualization-based explanations.
“However, it is not standardized yet whether the radiologists or neurologists are interested in these explanations or not.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The measures to validate the quality of produced explanations are not adequate.
“The measures to validate the quality of produced explanations are not adequate.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There does not exist any standard method for measuring the quality of explained healthcare decisions.
“There does not exist any standard method for measuring the quality of explained healthcare decisions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
DL is not efficient to infer causal relations between decisions and data.
“However, DL is not efficient to infer causal relations between decisions and data.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Causal links are required for taking fair decisions.
“These causal links are required for taking fair decisions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The excellent performance of ML/DL cannot be evidence of its safety.
“As the excellent performance of a ML/DL cannot be evidence of its safety, which is simply the determination of how safe is the ML/DL empowered system for humans, i.e., patients.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The employment of ML algorithms for clinical practice or use of patients is still distant.
“However, the employment of these algorithms for clinical practice or the use of patients is still distant.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The primary reason for the gap between healthcare ML research and clinical practice is the unexplained results of algorithms and sometimes poor performance.
“The primary reason for this gap is the unexplained results of algorithms and sometimes the poor performance of the algorithm.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Any bias in data, subjectivity, redundancy, or problem in data representation causes misleading results.
“Any bias in the data, subjectivity, redundancy, or problem in data representation causes misleading results.”
The paper relies on this without support.
If ML learns from data of patients denied medical care because of no health insurance, it will generate biased results.
“Another example can be the data of patients who were denied to take medical care because of no health insurance.If ML learns from that data, it will generate biased results.”
The paper relies on this without support.
If understandable explanations are given, a doctor is far better prepared to make a decision using these explainable models.
“It is clear that if understandable explanations are given, a doctor is far better prepared to make a decision using these explainable models.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Humans typically have foreknowledge of the problem domain, which they will use to believe or deny a prediction if they understand the explanation of results by the algorithm.
“Humans typically have foreknowledge of the problem domain, which they will use to believe or deny a prediction if they understand the explanation of results by the algorithm.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is no definite method to calculate the properties of good quality XML methods.
“The only limitation is that there is no definite method to calculate these properties.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Healthcare has unique legal, regulatory, and ethical challenges that must be considered when integrating ML/DL into clinical settings while ensuring deployed systems are robust and free from algorithmic bias.
“Moreover, unlike other domains, healthcare has unique challenges that involve legal, regulatory, and ethical challenges that need to be considered while integrating ML/DL based algorithms into actual clinical settings while ensuring that the deployed systems are robust and free from algorithmic bias.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Data imperfections in real-world data result in biased training and increase false positives and negatives.
“These data imperfections will eventually result in biased training and will increase the false positives and negatives.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The explainability of black-box models can assure reliable and ethical use in the medical field.
“The explainability of black-box models can assure reliable and ethical use in the medical field.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Class activation maps are only applicable for a specific CNN architecture that has a dense and global averaging pooling layer after the last convolutional layer.
“However, CAMs are only applicable for specific CNN architecture, i.e., CNN must have a dense and global averaging pooling layer after the last convolutional layer.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Online healthcare websites are not always concerned about the privacy of users' data.
“These websites also provide free data storing facility and are not always concerned about the privacy of the users' data.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Explanation of ML/DL techniques is required to gain the trust of clinicians in ML/DL empowered healthcare solutions.
“It is well established that the explanation of the ML/DL techniques is required to gain the trust of clinicians in ML/DL empowered healthcare solutions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
HCI is a well-developed technique to empower users.
“For example, humancomputer interaction (HCI) is a well-developed technique to empower users.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Advancements in ML/DL techniques have a great potential to revolutionize healthcare.
“The advancements in ML/DL techniques have a great potential to revolutionize healthcare.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The application of AI in healthcare brings forth several limitations that need to be addressed for its successful integration into clinical practice.
“The application of AI in healthcare brings forth several limitations that need to be addressed for its successful integration into clinical practice [37].”
From Ethical Framework for Harnessing the Power of AI in Healthcare and Beyond (2024) · cites this paper as [37]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
DeepLIFT application is attributed to different studies
MinorTable IV attributes the genetic-variants DeepLIFT application to Yang et al. [100], while the accompanying text attributes that application to Sharma et al. [117].
“DeepLIFT 2020 Yang et al. [100] Uses a reference value and measures the reference values of all neurons using a forward and backward pass -Genetic variants caused by diseases Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms”
“Sharma et al. [117] implemented DeepLIFT for Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS), which focused on studying genetic variants caused by common diseases.”
Depression-prediction population differs from cited study
MinorThe text describes study [91] as predicting depression in Alzheimer's patients. The cited study's title says it predicts depression in their caregivers.
“these models are also implemented for predicting the depression of Alzheimer's patients [91]”
“91. H. Byeon, "Developing a random forest classifier for predicting the depression and managing the health of caregivers supporting patients with alzheimer's disease,"”
Publication year of cited book conflicts with its reference
MinorThe text says the book cited as [138] was published in 2007, but reference [138] gives 1998.
“In Ethics, computing and medicine: Informatics and the transformation of health care, published in 2007 [138]”
“138. K. W. Goodman, Ethics, computing, and medicine: informatics and the transformation of health care. Cambridge University Press, 1998.”
CAM is classified as both model-agnostic and architecture-specific
MinorTable IV places CAM among model-agnostic methods, but the text says CAM applies only to a specific CNN architecture.
“TABLE IV: Summary of model-agnostic explanation methods for healthcare applications.”
“However, CAMs are only applicable for specific CNN architecture, i.e., CNN must have a dense and global averaging pooling layer after the last convolutional layer.”
Cites
Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization
Selvaraju, R. R., Cogswell, M., Das, A., Vedantam, R., Parikh, D., & Batra, D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.74 · Cited by 24,513 · see citing works
A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions
Lundberg, S., & Lee, S.-I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.07874 · Cited by 23,707 · see citing works
"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939778 · Cited by 17,555 · see citing works
Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks
Zeiler, M. D., & Fergus, R. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_53 · Cited by 15,839 · see citing works
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
Litjens, G., Kooi, T., Bejnordi, B. E., Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Ghafoorian, M., van der Laak, J. A. W. M., van Ginneken, B., & Sánchez, C. I. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 · Cited by 15,332 · see citing works
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29
Teymur, O., Zygalakis, K., & Calderhead, B. (2016) · Cited by 13,881 · see citing works
Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localization
Zhou, B., Khosla, A., Lapedriza, A., Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.319 · Cited by 11,428 · see citing works
Rudin, C. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x · Cited by 10,561 · see citing works
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
Topol, E. J. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7 · Cited by 10,450 · see citing works
Barredo Arrieta, A., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., Garcia, S., Gil-Lopez, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., et al. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012 · Cited by 10,423 · see citing works
Intriguing properties of neural networks
Szegedy, C., Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I., Bruna, J., Erhan, D., Goodfellow, I., & Fergus, R. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6199 · Cited by 8,143 · see citing works
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations
Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax2342 · Cited by 7,137 · see citing works
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2870052 · Cited by 6,294 · see citing works
Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences
Miller, T. (2019) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007 · Cited by 5,302 · see citing works
Proceedings European Conference on Computer Vision 2002
Heyden, A., Sparr, G., Nielsen, M., & Johansen, P. (2002) · Lund University Publications (Lund University) · Cited by 5,153 · see citing works
Principles of biomedical ethics
Horton, J. (2002) · Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.1016/s0035-9203(02)90265-8 · Cited by 4,405 · see citing works
Axiomatic attribution for deep networks
Sundararajan, M., Taly, A., & Yan, Q. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.01365 · Cited by 4,087 · see citing works
Predicting the future - big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine
Obermeyer, Z., & Emanuel, E. J. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1606181 · Cited by 3,652 · see citing works
(2001) · Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · doi:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2001.tb01222.x · Cited by 3,515 · see citing works
Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Net
Springenberg, J. T., Dosovitskiy, A., Brox, T., & Riedmiller, M. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6806 · Cited by 3,447 · see citing works
Christiane, Druml, Wolzt, & Pleiner (2001) · Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni · Cited by 3,419 · see citing works
International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening
McKinney, S. M., Sieniek, M., Godbole, V., Godwin, J., Antropova, N., Ashrafian, H., Back, T., Chesus, M., Corrado, G. S., Darzi, A., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6 · Cited by 3,287 · see citing works
Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence
Kelly, C. J., Karthikesalingam, A., Suleyman, M., Corrado, G., & King, D. (2019) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1426-2 · Cited by 3,136 · see citing works
Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning
Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1702.08608 · Cited by 3,121 · see citing works
The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
Voigt, P., & von dem Bussche, A. (2017) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57959-7 · Cited by 3,001 · see citing works
Methods for interpreting and understanding deep neural networks
Montavon, G., Samek, W., & Müller, K.-R. (2018) · Digital Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.dsp.2017.10.011 · Cited by 2,665 · see citing works
A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Toward Medical XAI
Tjoa, E., & Guan, C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2020.3027314 · Cited by 2,524 · see citing works
Guisan, A., Edwards, T. C., & Hastie, T. (2002) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/s0304-3800(02)00204-1 · Cited by 2,356 · see citing works
The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine
He, J., Baxter, S. L., Xu, J., Xu, J., Zhou, X., & Zhang, K. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0 · Cited by 2,246 · see citing works
Implementing Machine Learning in Health Care — Addressing Ethical Challenges
Char, D. S., Shah, N. H., & Magnus, D. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1714229 · Cited by 1,857 · see citing works
Intelligible Models for HealthCare: Predicting Pneumonia Risk and Hospital 30-day Readmission
Caruana, R., Lou, Y., Gehrke, J., Koch, P., Sturm, M., & Elhadad, N. (2015) · Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2783258.2788613 · Cited by 1,685 · see citing works
2013 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging
(2013) · doi:10.1109/isbi20048.2013 · Cited by 1,637 · see citing works
Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
Macskassy, S., & USA, K. '. T. 1. A. S. I. C. O. K. D. A. D. M. 2. S. D. C. (2014) · doi:10.1145/2623330 · Cited by 1,522 · see citing works
Explaining Deep Neural Networks and Beyond: A Review of Methods and Applications
Samek, W., Montavon, G., Lapuschkin, S., Anders, C. J., & Muller, K.-R. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2021.3060483 · Cited by 1,477 · see citing works
Deep learning for computational biology
Angermueller, C., Pärnamaa, T., Parts, L., & Stegle, O. (2016) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20156651 · Cited by 1,473 · see citing works
SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noise
Smilkov, D., Thorat, N., Kim, B., Viégas, F., & Wattenberg, M. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03825 · Cited by 1,467 · see citing works
Medical image analysis using convolutional neural networks: a review
Anwar, S. M., Majid, M., Qayyum, A., Awais, M., Alnowami, M., & Khan, M. K. (2018) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-018-1088-1 · Cited by 1,431 · see citing works
Self-citationExplainable AI: Interpreting, Explaining and Visualizing Deep Learning
(2019) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-28954-6 · Cited by 1,377 · see citing works
Explaining nonlinear classification decisions with deep taylor decomposition
Montavon, G., Lapuschkin, S., Binder, A., Samek, W., & Müller, K.-R. (2017) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2016.11.008 · Cited by 1,357 · see citing works
Sanity Checks for Saliency Maps
Adebayo, J., Gilmer, J., Muelly, M., Goodfellow, I., Hardt, M., & Kim, B. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.03292 · Cited by 1,294 · see citing works
Deep Learning in Medical Imaging: General Overview
Lee, J., Jun, S., Cho, Y.-W., Lee, H., Kim, G. B., Seo, J. B., & Kim, N. (2017) · Korean Journal of Radiology · doi:10.3348/kjr.2017.18.4.570 · Cited by 1,287 · see citing works
Do no harm: a roadmap for responsible machine learning for health care
Wiens, J., Saria, S., Sendak, M., Ghassemi, M., Liu, V. X., Doshi-Velez, F., Jung, K., Heller, K., Kale, D., Saeed, M., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0548-6 · Cited by 1,266 · see citing works
Robustness May Be at Odds with AccuracyPreprint
Tsipras, D., Santurkar, S., Engstrom, L., Turner, A., & Mądry, A. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.12152 · Cited by 1,240 · see citing works
Adversarial attacks on medical machine learning
Finlayson, S. G., Bowers, J. D., Ito, J., Zittrain, J. L., Beam, A. L., & Kohane, I. S. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw4399 · Cited by 1,088 · see citing works
Samek, W., Wiegand, T., & Müller, K.-R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1708.08296 · Cited by 1,080 · see citing works
(2019) · Cited by 986 · see citing works
(1971) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 983 · see citing works
A primer on deep learning in genomics
Zou, J., Huss, M., Abid, A., Mohammadi, P., Torkamani, A., & Telenti, A. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0295-5 · Cited by 891 · see citing works
Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation
Agassi, J., & Wiezenbaum, J. (1976) · Technology and Culture · doi:10.2307/3103715 · Cited by 887 · see citing works
Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (OECD)
Yeung, K. (2020) · International Legal Materials · doi:10.1017/ilm.2020.5 · Cited by 824 · see citing works
Markus, A. F., Kors, J. A., & Rijnbeek, P. R. (2021) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103655 · Cited by 811 · see citing works
Xiao, C., Choi, E., & Sun, J. (2018) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocy068 · Cited by 792 · see citing works
Leakage in data mining: Formulation, detection, and avoidance
Kaufman, S., Rosset, S., Perlich, C., & Stitelman, O. (2012) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/2382577.2382579 · Cited by 791 · see citing works
2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining
(2010) · doi:10.1109/icdm17440.2010 · Cited by 779 · see citing works
Review of MRI-based brain tumor image segmentation using deep learning methods
Işın, A., Direkoğlu, C., & Şah, M. (2016) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.407 · Cited by 766 · see citing works
Interpretation of Neural Networks Is Fragile
Ghorbani, A., Abid, A., & Zou, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33013681 · Cited by 765 · see citing works
Explainable Deep Learning Models in Medical Image Analysis
Singh, A., Sengupta, S., & Lakshminarayanan, V. (2020) · Journal of Imaging · doi:10.3390/jimaging6060052 · Cited by 718 · see citing works
Ethical Machine Learning in Healthcare
Chen, I. Y., Pierson, E., Rose, S., Joshi, S., Ferryman, K., & Ghassemi, M. (2021) · Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-092820-114757 · Cited by 645 · see citing works
What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain?
Holzinger, A., Biemann, C., Pattichis, C. S., & Kell, D. B. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1712.09923 · Cited by 636 · see citing works
A Survey of Methods for Explaining Black Box Models
Guidotti, R., Monreale, A., Ruggieri, S., Turini, F., Giannotti, F., & Pedreschi, D. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3236009 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Jensen, S., Boley, D. L., Gini, M. L., & Schrater, P. (2005) · Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence · Cited by 612 · see citing works
Tech Adoption Climbs Among Older Adults
Perrin, M. A. A. A. (2017) · Cited by 609 · see citing works
The need for uncertainty quantification in machine-assisted medical decision making
Begoli, E., Bhattacharya, T., & Kusnezov, D. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-018-0004-1 · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Interpretable Machine Learning in Healthcare
Ahmad, M. A., Eckert, C., & Teredesai, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics · doi:10.1145/3233547.3233667 · Cited by 583 · see citing works
(2016) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 556 · see citing works
Opening the black box: the promise and limitations of explainable machine learning in cardiology
Petch, J., Di, S., & Nelson, W. (2022) · Canadian Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2021.09.004 · Cited by 552 · see citing works
On the ethics of algorithmic decision-making in healthcare
Grote, T., & Berens, P. (2020) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105586 · Cited by 551 · see citing works
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Hossain, M. (2021) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6371435 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence
Haibe-Kains, B., Adam, G. A., Hosny, A., Khodakarami, F., Massive Analysis Quality Control (MAQC) Society Board of Directors, Shraddha, T., Kusko, R., Sansone, S.-A., Tong, W., Wolfinger, R. D., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2766-y · Cited by 540 · see citing works
COVID-19 Patient Health Prediction Using Boosted Random Forest Algorithm
Iwendi, C., Bashir, A. K., Peshkar, A., Sujatha, R., Chatterjee, J. M., Pasupuleti, S., Mishra, R., Pillai, S. K., & Jo, O. (2020) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00357 · Cited by 520 · see citing works
Interpretable Machine Learning
Molnar, C. (2020) · Cited by 506 · see citing works
Visualizing Deep Neural Network Decisions: Prediction Difference Analysis
Zintgraf, L. M., Cohen, T. S., Adel, T., & Welling, M. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1702.04595 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI
(2020) · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190067397.001.0001 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
Prediction of the development of acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery by machine learning
Tseng, P.-Y., Chen, Y., Wang, C.-H., Chiu, K., Peng, Y.-S., Hsu, S., Chen, K.-L., Yang, C., & Lee, O. K. (2020) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-020-03179-9 · Cited by 448 · see citing works
Medical image retrieval using deep convolutional neural network
Qayyum, A., Anwar, S. M., Awais, M., & Majid, M. (2017) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2017.05.025 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Self-citationMachine Learning for Predicting Epileptic Seizures Using EEG Signals: A Review
Rasheed, K., Qayyum, A., Qadir, J., Sivathamboo, S., Kwan, P., Kuhlmann, L., O'Brien, T. J., & Razi, A. (2020) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2020.3008792 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Self-citationIdentifying Ethical Considerations for Machine Learning Healthcare Applications
Char, D. S., Abràmoff, M. D., & Feudtner, C. (2020) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2020.1819469 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
How Socioeconomic Status Affects Patient Perceptions of Health Care: A Qualitative Study.
Arpey, N. C., Gaglioti, A. H., & Rosenbaum, M. E. (2017) · Journal of Primary Care & Community Health · doi:10.1177/2150131917697439 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Deterministic Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations for Stable Explainability
Zafar, M. R., & Khan, N. (2021) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make3030027 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Can AI Help Reduce Disparities in General Medical and Mental Health Care?
(2019) · AMA Journal of Ethics · doi:10.1001/amajethics.2019.167 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Establishing the rules for building trustworthy AI
Floridi, L. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0055-y · Cited by 394 · see citing works
CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparison
Irvin, J., Rajpurkar, P., Ko, M., Yu, Y., Ciurea-Ilcus, S., Chute, C., Marklund, H., Haghgoo, B., Ball, R., Shpanskaya, K., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.3301590 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Causality matters in medical imaging
Castro, D. C., Walker, I., & Glocker, B. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17478-w · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Collaborative Federated Learning for Healthcare: Multi-Modal COVID-19 Diagnosis at the Edge
Qayyum, A., Ahmad, K., Ahsan, M. A., Al-Fuqaha, A., & Qadir, J. (2022) · IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society · doi:10.1109/ojcs.2022.3206407 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Self-citationSecurity and Privacy Issues with Health Care Information Technology
Meingast, M., Roosta, T. G., & Sastry, S. (2006) · doi:10.1109/iembs.2006.260060 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Su, D., Zhang, H., Chen, H., Yi, J., Chen, P., & Gao, Y. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01258-8_39 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Learning how to explain neural networks: PatternNet and PatternAttributionPreprint
Kindermans, P.-J., Schütt, K. T., Alber, M., Müller, K. R., Erhan, D., Kim, B., & Dähne, S. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.05598 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
A healthcare monitoring system using random forest and internet of things (IoT)
Kaur, P., Kumar, R., & Kumar, M. (2019) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-019-7327-8 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
IoT Security, Privacy, Safety and Ethics
Atlam, H. F., & Wills, G. B. (2019) · Internet of things · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-18732-3_8 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Trebeschi, S., van Griethuysen, J. J. M., Lambregts, D. M. J., Lahaye, M. J., Parmar, C., Bakers, F. C. H., Peters, N. H. G. M., Beets‐Tan, R. G. H., & Aerts, H. J. W. L. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05728-9 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Böhle, M., Eitel, F., Weygandt, M., & Ritter, K. (2019) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2019.00194 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Patient Will See You Now: The Future of Medicine is in Your Hands
Kim, E. (2015) · Healthcare Informatics Research · doi:10.4258/hir.2015.21.4.321 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Causality matters in medical imaging
Castro, D. C., Walker, I. D., & Glocker, B. (2020) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Shen, S., Han, S. X., Aberle, D. R., Bui, A. A., & Hsu, W. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.048 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Creative Destruction of Medicine: How the Digital Revolution Will Create Better Health Care
Kim, J. A. (2013) · Healthcare Informatics Research · doi:10.4258/hir.2013.19.3.229 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Adaptive Laplace Mechanism: Differential Privacy Preservation in Deep Learning
Phan, N., Wu, X., Hu, H., & Dou, D. (2017) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2017.48 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Code of Medical Ethics of the American Medical Association
Riddick, F. A. (2011) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e318215e9ba · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Unsupervised domain adaptation for medical imaging segmentation with self-ensembling
Perone, C. S., Ballester, P. L., Barros, R. C., & Cohen‐Adad, J. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.026 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Towards the Science of Security and Privacy in Machine LearningPreprint
Papernot, N., McDaniel, P. D., Sinha, A., & Wellman, M. P. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.03814 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
An explainable artificial intelligence system for small-unit tactical behavior
van Lent, M., Fisher, W. M., & Mancuso, M. R. (2004) · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Holzinger, A., Dehmer, M., Emmert‐Streib, F., Cucchiara, R., Augenstein, I., Ser, J. D., Samek, W., Jurišica, I., & Díaz-Rodríguez, N. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.10.007 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Islam, J., & Zhang, Y. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70772-3_20 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Adversarial Examples Are a Natural Consequence of Test Error in NoisePreprint
Ford, N., Gilmer, J., Carlini, N., & Cubuk, E. D. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.10513 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Deep learning for healthcare decision making with EMRs
Liang, Z., Zhang, G., Huang, J. X., & Hu, Q. V. (2014) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm.2014.6999219 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Differential privacy-enabled federated learning for sensitive health data
Choudhury, O., Gkoulalas-Divanis, A., Salonidis, T., Sylla, I., Park, Y., Hsu, G., & Das, A. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.02578 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
The Digital Doctor: Hope, Hype, and Harm at the Dawn of Medicine’s Computer Age
Delgado, S. A. (2016) · Critical Care Nurse · doi:10.4037/ccn2016880 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Perturbation-Based Explanations of Prediction Models
Robnik-Šikonja, M., & Bohanec, M. (2018) · Human–Computer Interaction Series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90403-0_9 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
CT-GAN: Malicious Tampering of 3D Medical Imagery using Deep Learning
Mirsky, Y., Mahler, T., Shelef, I., & Elovici, Y. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.03597 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Zhang, J., Kowsari, K., Harrison, J. H., Lobo, J. M., & Barnes, L. E. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2875677 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Pereira, S., Meier, R., Alves, V., Reyes, M., & Silva, C. A. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02628-8_12 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
What we talk about when we talk about trust: Theory of trust for AI in healthcare
Gille, F., Jobin, A., & Ienca, M. (2020) · Intelligence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ibmed.2020.100001 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Vices of the Mind: From the Intellectual to the Political
Cassam, Q. (2018) · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Local interpretable model-agnostic explanations for classification of lymph node metastases
Palatnik de Sousa, I., Maria Bernardes Rebuzzi Vellasco, M., & Costa da Silva, E. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19132969 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Robustness and Explainability of Artificial Intelligence
(2020) · Joint Research Centre (European Commission) · doi:10.2760/57493 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Ethics of the health-related internet of things: a narrative review
Mittelstadt, B. (2017) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-017-9426-4 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
The Rashomon Effect: When Ethnographers Disagree
Heider, K. G. (1988) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.1988.90.1.02a00050 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
The Hippocratic Oath and the ethics of medicine
Miles, S. H. (2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-0982 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
2013 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics
(2013) · doi:10.1109/ichi30775.2013 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Clinical Interpretable Deep Learning Model for Glaucoma Diagnosis
Liao, W., Zou, B., Zhao, R., Chen, Y., He, Z., & Zhou, M. (2019) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2019.2949075 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Deep learning models for electrocardiograms are susceptible to adversarial attack
Han, X., Hu, Y., Foschini, L., Chinitz, L. A., Jankelson, L., & Ranganath, R. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0791-x · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Explainable AI for Healthcare: From Black Box to Interpretable Models
Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2020) · Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-0947-6_31 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Anguita, D., Ghio, A., Greco, N., Oneto, L., & Ridella, S. (2010) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2010.5596450 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Interpretable Deep Learning in Drug Discovery
Preuer, K., Klambauer, G., Rippmann, F., Hochreiter, S., & Unterthiner, T. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-28954-6_18 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Practical Grey-box Process Identification: Theory and Applications
Bohlin, T. (2006) · DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) · doi:10.1007/1-84628-403-1 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
THE DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL ETHICS -A SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
Waddington, I. (1975) · Medical History · doi:10.1017/s002572730001992x · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Explainable Recommendation through Attentive Multi-View Learning
Gao, J., Wang, X., Wang, Y., & Xie, X. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33013622 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
The Nuremberg Doctors' Trial in Historical Context
Marrus, M. R. (1999) · Bulletin of the history of medicine · doi:10.1353/bhm.1999.0037 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
(2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Towards Better Explanations of Class Activation Mapping
Jung, H., & Oh, Y. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00137 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Levey, M. (1967) · Transactions of the American Philosophical Society · doi:10.2307/1006137 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Ethical justification for conducting public health surveillance without patient consent
Lee, L. M., Heilig, C. M., & White, A. (2012) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2011.300297 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Deep learning detection of informative features in tau PET for Alzheimer’s disease classification
Jo, T., Nho, K. T., Risacher, S. L., Saykin, A. J., & Initiative, A. D. N. (2020) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-020-03848-0 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Gibbons, R. D., Hooker, G., Finkelman, M. D., Weiss, D. J., Pilkonis, P. A., Frank, E., Moore, T., & Kupfer, D. J. (2013) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.12m08338 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Turning point: policymaking in the era of artificial intelligence
Chen, K. (2022) · International Affairs · doi:10.1093/ia/iiac074 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
2009 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks
(2009) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn15198.2009 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Decision trees do not generalize to new variations
Bengio, Y., Delalleau, O., & Simard, C. (2010) · Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8640.2010.00366.x · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Parametric image reconstruction using spectral analysis of PET projection data
Meikle, S. R., Matthews, J. C., Cunningham, V. J., Bailey, D. L., Livieratos, L., Jones, T., & Price, P. (1998) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/43/3/016 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Explaining Therapy Predictions with Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation in Neural Networks
Yang, Y., Tresp, V., Wunderle, M., & Fasching, P. A. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI) · doi:10.1109/ichi.2018.00025 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Suresh, A., Udendhran, R., & Balamurgan, M. (2019) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-019-04066-4 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Understanding and Interpreting Machine Learning in Medical Image Computing Applications
Pereira, S., Meier, R., Alves, V., Reyes, M., & Silva, C. A. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02628-8 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Ethical issues in public health surveillance: a systematic qualitative review
Klingler, C., Silva, D. S., Schuermann, C., Reis, A. A., Saxena, A., & Strech, D. (2017) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4200-4 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Yu, D., Liu, Z., Su, C., Han, Y., Duan, X., Zhang, R., Liu, X., Yang, Y., & Xu, S. (2020) · Thoracic Cancer · doi:10.1111/1759-7714.13204 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Securing Machine Learning in the Cloud: A Systematic Review of Cloud Machine Learning Security
Qayyum, A., Ijaz, A., Usama, M., Iqbal, W., Qadir, J., Elkhatib, Y., & Al‐Fuqaha, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2020.587139 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationYang, J., Zhang, M., Chen, Y., Ma, L., Yadikaer, R., Lu, Y., Lou, P., Pu, Y., Xiang, R., & Rui, B. (2020) · International Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.032 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Prolegomena to a White Paper on an Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society
Cowls, J., & Floridi, L. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3198732 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Machine Learning and AI for Healthcare: Big Data for Improved Health Outcomes
Panesar, A. (2021) · Apress eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4842-6537-6 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Evaluation of patient safety culture using a random forest algorithm
Simsekler, M. C. E., Qazi, A. J., Alalami, M. A., Ellahham, S. H., & Ozonoff, A. (2020) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2020.107186 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Zafar, M. R., & Khan, N. M. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.10263 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
How Interpretable and Trustworthy are GAMs?
Chang, C.-H., Tan, S., Lengerich, B., Goldenberg, A., & Caruana, R. (2021) · Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3447548.3467453 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Explainable machine learning practices: opening another black box for reliable medical AI
Ratti, E., & Graves, M. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00141-z · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Opportunities in Machine Learning for Healthcare.Preprint
Ghassemi, M., Naumann, T., Schulam, P., Beam, A. L., & Ranganath, R. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Secure and robust machine learning for healthcare: A survey
Qayyum, A., Qadir, J., Bilal, M., & Al-Fuqaha, A. (2021) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2020.3013489 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationDetection of epilepsy with Electroencephalogram using rule-based classifiers
Wang, G., Deng, Z., & Choi, K. (2016) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2016.09.080 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
The patient will see you now the future of medicine is in your hands
Topol, E. J. 1. (2015) · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Explaining Support Vector Machines: A Color Based Nomogram
Belle, V. V., CALSTER, B. V., Huffel, S. V., Suykens, J. A. K., & Lisboa, P. J. G. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164568 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Using decision tree classification to assist in the prediction of Alzheimer's disease
AL-Dlaeen, D., & Alashqur, A. (2014) · doi:10.1109/csit.2014.6805989 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Levin, S., Barnes, S., Toerper, M. F., Debraine, A., DeAngelo, A., Hamrock, E., Hinson, J. S., Hoyer, E. H., Dungarani, T., & Howell, E. E. (2020) · BMJ Innovations · doi:10.1136/bmjinnov-2020-000420 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
The Ethics of AI in Biomedical Research, Patient Care and Public Health
Blasimme, A., & Vayena, E. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190067397.013.45 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Zafar, M. R., & Khan, N. (2023) · doi:10.32920/22734359 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
The Ethics of AI in Biomedical Research, Patient Care and Public Health
Blasimme, A., & Vayena, E. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3368756 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Participatory design of probability-based decision support tools for in-hospital nurses
Jeffery, A. D., Novak, L. L., Kennedy, B., Dietrich, M. S., & Mion, L. C. (2017) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocx060 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
A Human-Grounded Evaluation Benchmark for Local Explanations of Machine LearningPreprint
Mohseni, S., Block, J. E., & Ragan, E. D. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1801.05075 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Tutorial: Safe and Reliable Machine LearningPreprint
Saria, S., & Subbaswamy, A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.07204 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Izadyyazdanabadi, M., Belykh, E. G., Cavallo, C., Zhao, X., Gandhi, S., Moreira, L. B., Eschbacher, J. M., Nakaji, P., Preul, M. C., & Yang, Y. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00934-2_34 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
A Human-Grounded Evaluation of SHAP for Alert ProcessingPreprint
Weerts, H., van Ipenburg, W., & Pechenizkiy, M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.03324 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
The Ethical Implications of Personal Health Monitoring
Mittelstadt, B., Fairweather, B., Shaw, M., & McBride, N. (2014) · International Journal of Technoethics · doi:10.4018/ijt.2014070104 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Kao, Y., & Venkatachalam, R. (2018) · Computational Economics · doi:10.1007/s10614-018-9803-z · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Dastoorpoor, M., Khanjani, N., Moradgholi, A., Sarizadeh, R., Cheraghi, M., & Estebsari, F. (2020) · International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health · doi:10.1007/s00420-020-01577-8 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Improving Information Security Behaviour in the Healthcare Context
Box, D., & Pottas, D. (2013) · Procedia Technology · doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.122 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Towards Interpretability of Segmentation Networks by Analyzing DeepDreams
Couteaux, V., Nempont, O., Pizaine, G., & Isabelle Bloch, A. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33850-3_7 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Embedded Systems and Artificial Intelligence
Bhateja, V., Satapathy, S. C., & Satori, H. (2020) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-0947-6 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Association rule analysis in cardiovascular disease
Khare, S., & Gupta, D. (2016) · International Conference on Cognitive Computing and Information Processing · doi:10.1109/ccip.2016.7802881 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Suzuki, K., Reyes, M., Syeda-Mahmood, T. F., Ender Konukoglu, A., Glocker, B., Wiest, R., Gur, Y., Greenspan, H. K., & Madabhushi, A. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33850-3 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Caveat Emptor: The Risks of Using Big Data for Human Development
Latif, S., Qayyum, A., Usama, M., Qadir, J., Zwitter, A., & Shahzad, M. (2019) · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine · doi:10.1109/mts.2019.2930273 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationDeep learning could diagnose diabetic nephropathy with renal pathological immunofluorescent images
Kitamura, S., Takahashi, K., Sang, Y., Fukushima, K., Tsuji, K., & Wada, J. (2020) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics10070466 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Ethics, computing and medicine: informatics and the transformation of health care.
Rose, C. (1999) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/16.6.636-a · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Towards Explainable Neural-Symbolic Visual Reasoning
Bennetot, A., Laurent, J.-L., Chatila, R., & Díaz-Rodríguez, N. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.09065 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Generalizability vs. Robustness: Adversarial Examples for Medical ImagingPreprint
Paschali, M., Conjeti, S., Navarro, F., & Navab, N. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1804.00504 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
International Conference on Innovative Data Communication Technologies and Application
(2023) · International Conference on Innovative Data Communication Technologies and Application (ICIDCA) · doi:10.1109/icidca56705.2023.10100178 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Deep Learning in Orthopedics: How Do We Build Trust in the Machine?
Borjali, A., Chen, A. F., Muratoglu, O. K., Morid, M. A., & Varadarajan, K. M. (2020) · Healthcare Transformation · doi:10.1089/heat.2019.0006 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Reply to: Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence
McKinney, S. M., Karthikesalingam, A., Tse, D., Kelly, C. J., Liu, Y., Corrado, G. S., & Shetty, S. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2767-x · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Bogdanov, D., Kamm, L., Laur, S., & Sokk, V. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2018.2858818 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Vatian, A. S., Gusarova, N., Dobrenko, N., Dudorov, S., Nigmatullin, N., Shalyto, A. A., & Lobantsev, A. (2019) · Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT) · doi:10.23919/fruct.2019.8711974 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Eslami, T., Raiker, J. S., & Saeed, F. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-822822-7.00004-1 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Ethical Issues in Our Relationship with Artificial Entities
Donath, J. S. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190067397.013.3 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Nestor, B. A., McDermott, M. B. A., Chauhan, G., Naumann, T., Hughes, M. C., Goldenberg, A., & Ghassemi, M. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.12583 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Deep Learning Predicts Rapid Over-softening and Shelf Life in Persimmon Fruits
Suzuki, M., Masuda, K., Asakuma, H., Takeshita, K., Baba, K., Kubo, Y., Ushijima, K., Uchida, S., & Akagi, T. (2022) · The Horticulture Journal · doi:10.2503/hortj.utd-323 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Bias Also Matters: Bias Attribution for Deep Neural Network Explanation
Wang, S., Zhou, T., & Bilmes, J. (2019) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Byeon, H. (2019) · Technology and Health Care · doi:10.3233/thc-191738 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Neural Engineering Techniques for Autism Spectrum Disorder
(2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2019-0-05414-3 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Ognjanović, I. (2020) · Studies in health technology and informatics · doi:10.3233/shti200677 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Adaptive Laplace Mechanism: Differential Privacy Preservation in Deep LearningPreprint
Phan, N., Wu, X., Hu, H., et al. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1709.05750 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Gupta, V., Demirer, M., Bigelow, M. T., Yu, S. M., Yu, J. S., Prevedello, L. M. S., White, R. D., & Erdal, B. S. (2020) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi45749.2020.9098436 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Chinese medicine prescription recommendation using generative adversarial network
Rong, C., Li, X., Sun, X., & Sun, H. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3143797 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Healthcare Expenditure Prediction with Neighbourhood Variables – A Random Forest Model
Mohnen, S. M., Rotteveel, A. H., Doornbos, G., & Polder, J. J. (2020) · Statistics Politics and Policy · doi:10.1515/spp-2019-0010 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Planning for the Known Unknown: Machine Learning for Human Healthcare Systems
Chen, J. H., & Verghese, A. (2020) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2020.1822674 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
SPAM-DaS: Secure and Privacy-Aware Misinformation Detection as a ServicePreprint
Ali, H. M., Javed, R. T., Qayyum, A., AlGhadhban, A., Alazmi, M., Alzamil, A., Al-Utaibi, K. A., & Qadir, J. (2022) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.19351679.v1 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationYang, R. (2020) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.06.07.20124933 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 217 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Betancur, 2018, Deep learning for prediction of obstructive disease from fast myocardial perfusion SPECT: a multicenter study, JACC: Cardiovasc. Imaging, 11, 1654
- Wierzynski, 2018, The challenges and opportunities of explainable AI, Intel. Com, 12
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Privacy-preserving artificial intelligence in healthcare: Techniques and applications
Khalid, N., Qayyum, A., Bilal, M., Al-Fuqaha, A., & Qadir, J. (2023) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106848 · Cited by 581 · see citing works
Self-citationMarques, L., Costa, B., Pereira, M., Silva, A., Santos, J., Saldanha, L., da Silva, I. C. B., Magalhães, P., Schmidt, S., & Vale, N. (2024) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics16030332 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks in Medical Image Analysis: A Review
Mienye, I. D., Swart, T. G., Obaido, G., Jordan, M., & Ilono, P. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16030195 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Quantum computing for healthcare: a review
Ur Rasool, R., Ahmad, H. F., Rafique, W., Qayyum, A., Qadir, J., & Anwar, Z. (2023) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi15030094 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Self-citationRahman, A., Debnath, T., Kundu, D., Khan, M. S. I., Aishi, A. A., Sazzad, S., Sayduzzaman, M., & Band, S. S. (2024) · AIMS Public Health · doi:10.3934/publichealth.2024004 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Javed, H., El–Sappagh, S., & Abuhmed, T. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-024-11005-9 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Wani, N. A., Kumar, R., Mamta, ., Bedi, J., & Rida, I. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102472 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Khoo, L. S., McNaney, R., Lim, M. K., & McNaney, R. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s24020348 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Ethical Framework for Harnessing the Power of AI in Healthcare and Beyond
Nasir, S., Khan, R. A., & Bai, S. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3369912 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Survey of Deep Learning Approaches in Image Processing
Τρίγκα, Μ., & Dritsas, E. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25020531 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Ayano, Y. M., Schwenker, F., Dufera, B. D., & Debelee, T. G. (2022) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics13010111 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Enhancing Internet of Medical Things security with artificial intelligence: A comprehensive review
Messinis, S., Temenos, N., Protonotarios, N. Ε., Rallis, I., Kalogeras, D., & Doulamis, N. D. (2024) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108036 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Ethics of AI in Radiology: A Review of Ethical and Societal Implications
Goisauf, M., & Abadía, M. C. (2022) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2022.850383 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Hassan, S. U., Abdulkadir, S. J., Zahid, M. S. M., & Al-Selwi, S. M. (2024) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109569 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Explainable artificial intelligence for omics data: a systematic mapping study
Toussaint, P. A., Leiser, F., Thiebes, S., Schlesner, M., Brors, B., & Sunyaev, A. (2023) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbad453 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Chest X-ray Images for Lung Disease Detection Using Deep Learning Techniques: A Comprehensive Survey
Al‐qaness, M. A. A., Zhu, J., AL-Alimi, D., Dahou, A., Alsamhi, S. H., Elaziz, M. A., & Ewees, A. A. (2024) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-024-10081-y · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Quantum Computing and Machine Learning in Medical Decision-Making: A Comprehensive Review
Chow, J. C. L. (2025) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a18030156 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Secure and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence-extended Reality (AI-XR) for Metaverses
Qayyum, A., Butt, M. A., Ali, H. M., Usman, M., Halabi, O., Al‐Fuqaha, A., Abbasi, Q. H., Imran, M. A., & Qadir, J. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3614426 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationSadr, H., Nazari, M., Khodaverdian, Z., Farzan, R., Yousefzadeh-Chabok, S., Ashoobi, M. T., Hemmati, H., Hendi, A., Ashraf, A., Pedram, M. M., et al. (2025) · European journal of medical research · doi:10.1186/s40001-025-02680-7 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Motwani, A., Shukla, P. K., & Pawar, M. K. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102431 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Towards Risk‐Free Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: Significance and Requirements
Alzubaidi, L., Al-Sabaawi, A., Bai, J., Dukhan, A., Alkenani, A. H., Al‐Asadi, A., Alwzwazy, H. A., Manoufali, M., Fadhel, M. A., Albahri, A. S., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1155/2023/4459198 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Tariq, A., Serhani, M. A., Sallabi, F., Barka, E. S., Qayyum, T., Khater, H. M., & Shuaib, K. (2024) · IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2024.3438264 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Mahim, S. M., Ali, M. S., Hasan, M. O., Nafi, A. A. N., Sadat, A. K. M., Hasan, S. A., Shareef, B., Ahsan, M. M., Islam, M. K., Miah, M. S., et al. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3351809 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
An Empirical Study of Pre-Trained Model Reuse in the Hugging Face Deep Learning Model Registry
Jiang, W., Synovic, N., Hyatt, M., Schorlemmer, T. R., Sethi, R., Lu, Y.-H., Thiruvathukal, G. K., & Davis, J. C. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) · doi:10.1109/icse48619.2023.00206 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Alzubaidi, L., Al-Dulaimi, K., Salhi, A., Alammar, Z., Fadhel, M. A., Albahri, A. S., Alamoodi, A. H., Albahri, O. S., Hasan, A. F., Bai, J., et al. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102935 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Large model-driven hyperscale healthcare data fusion analysis in complex multi-sensors
Lv, J., Kim, B., Parameshachari, B. D., Słowik, A., & Li, K. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102780 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Privacy preservation in Artificial Intelligence and Extended Reality (AI-XR) metaverses: A survey
Alkaeed, M., Qayyum, A., & Qadir, J. (2024) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2024.103989 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Self-citationPersonalized health monitoring using explainable AI: bridging trust in predictive healthcare
Vani, M. S., Sudhakar, R. V., Mahendar, A., Ledalla, S., Radha, M., & Sunitha, M. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-15867-z · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Gurmessa, D. K., & Jimma, W. (2024) · BMJ Health & Care Informatics · doi:10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100954 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Interpretable Machine Learning for Discovery: Statistical Challenges and Opportunities
Allen, G. I., Gan, L., & Zheng, L. (2023) · Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application · doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-040120-030919 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Human centred explainable AI decision-making in healthcare
van Leersum, C. M., & Maathuis, C. (2025) · Journal of Responsible Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jrt.2025.100108 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Surgery: Transforming Outcomes and Shaping the Future
Leivaditis, V., Beltsios, E. T., Papatriantafyllou, A., Grapatsas, K., Mulita, F., Kontodimopoulos, N., Baikoussis, N. G., Tchabashvili, L., Tasios, K., Maroulis, I., et al. (2025) · Clinics and Practice · doi:10.3390/clinpract15010017 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Eleven quick tips for data cleaning and feature engineering
Chicco, D., Oneto, L., & Tavazzi, E. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010718 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
What Is the Role of Explainability in Medical Artificial Intelligence? A Case-Based Approach
Hildt, E. (2025) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering12040375 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Yuan, H., Yu, K., Xie, F., Liu, M., & Sun, S. (2024) · Medicine Advances · doi:10.1002/med4.75 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Grad-CAM (Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping): A systematic literature review
Fayyaz, A. M., Abdulkadir, S. J., Talpur, N., Al-Selwi, S. M., Hassan, S. U., & Sumiea, E. H. (2025) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.111200 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Restoring the missing person to personalized medicine and precision psychiatry
Gómez-Carrillo, A., Paquin, V., Dumas, G., & Kirmayer, L. J. (2023) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2023.1041433 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Exploring the Intersection of Machine Learning and Big Data: A Survey
Dritsas, E., & Τρίγκα, Μ. (2025) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make7010013 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Systems engineering issues for industry applications of large language model
Chen, W., Yan-yi, L., Tie-zheng, G., Li, D., Tao, H., Li, Z., Yang, Q., Hui-han, W., & Ying-you, W. (2023) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2023.111165 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Butt, M. A., Qayyum, A., Ali, H. M., Al‐Fuqaha, A., & Qadir, J. (2022) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2022.103058 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationGhadimi, D. J., Vahdani, A. M., Karimi, H., Ebrahimi, P., Fathi, M., Moodi, F., Habibzadeh, A., Shoushtari, F. K., Valizadeh, G., Salari, H. M., et al. (2024) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.29543 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Foroutan, E., Hu, T., & Li, Z. (2025) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2025.106243 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Bongomin, O., Nzila, C. K., Mwasiagi, J. I., & Maube, O. (2024) · International Journal of Energy Research · doi:10.1155/2024/6087208 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
An explainable knowledge distillation method with XGBoost for ICU mortality prediction
Liu, M., Guo, C., & Guo, S. (2022) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106466 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Goisauf, M., Abadía, M. C., Akyüz, K., Bobowicz, M., Buyx, A., Colussi, I. A., Fritzsche, M.-C., Lekadir, K., Marttinen, P., Mayrhofer, M. T., et al. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/71236 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Ansari, Z. A., Tripathi, M. M., & Ahmed, R. (2025) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-025-00307-8 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Digital healthcare framework for patients with disabilities based on deep federated learning schemes
Lakhan, A. R., Hamouda, H. N., Abdulkareem, K. H., Alyahya, S., & Mohammed, M. A. (2023) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107845 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
On-Demand-FL: A Dynamic and Efficient Multicriteria Federated Learning Client Deployment Scheme
Chahoud, M., Sami, H., Mourad, A., Otoum, S., Otrok, H., Bentahar, J., & Guizani, M. (2023) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3265564 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Explainable AI in Healthcare Application
Sindiramutty, S. R., Tee, W. J., Balakrishnan, S., Kaur, S., Thangaveloo, R., Jazri, H., Khan, N. A., Gharib, A. H., & Manchuri, A. R. (2024) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-6361-1.ch005 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Thyroid Disease Multi-class Classification based on Optimized Gradient Boosting Model
Alnaggar, M., Handosa, M., Medhat, T., & Rashad, M. Z. (2023) · Egyptian Journal of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.21608/ejai.2023.205554.1008 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
MED-Prompt: A novel prompt engineering framework for medicine prediction on free-text clinical notes
Ahmed, A., Zeng, X., Xi, R., Hou, M., & Shah, S. A. (2024) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2024.101933 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
FedMint: Intelligent Bilateral Client Selection in Federated Learning With Newcomer IoT Devices
Wehbi, O., Arisdakessian, S., Wahab, O. A., Otrok, H., Otoum, S., Mourad, A., & Guizani, M. (2023) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3283855 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Gürsoy, E., & Kaya, Y. (2023) · Multimedia Systems · doi:10.1007/s00530-023-01083-0 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Singh, K., & Malhotra, D. (2023) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-023-09927-8 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Budiarto, A., Tsang, K. C. H., Wilson, A. M., Sheikh, A., & Shah, S. A. (2023) · JMIR AI · doi:10.2196/46717 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Deng, J., Elghobashy, M. E., Zang, K., Patel, S. K., Guo, E., & Heybati, K. (2025) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x251343082 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Health Risk Assessment Using Machine Learning: Systematic Review
Abhadiomhen, S. E., Nzeakor, E. O., & Oyibo, K. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13224405 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Boudreault, J., Ruf, A., Campagna, C., & Chebana, F. (2024) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2024.105785 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Exploring explainable AI features in the vocal biomarkers of lung disease
Chen, Z., Liang, N., Li, H., Zhang, H., Li, H., Yan, L., Hu, Z., Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., et al. (2024) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108844 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Hospital Length-of-Stay Prediction Using Machine Learning Algorithms—A Literature Review
Almeida, G., Correia, F. B., Borges, A. R., & Bernardino, J. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app142210523 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Predicting thalassemia using deep neural network based on red blood cell indices
Mo, D., Zheng, Q., Xiao, B., & Li, L. (2023) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cca.2023.117329 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
McElroy, S. J., & Lueschow, S. R. (2023) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2023.1182597 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Explainable AI for enhanced accuracy in malaria diagnosis using ensemble machine learning models
Awe, O. O., Mwangi, P. N., Goudoungou, S. K., Esho, R., & Oyejide, O. S. (2025) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-025-02874-3 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Qayyum, A., Sultani, W., Shamshad, F., Tufail, R., & Qadir, J. (2022) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105879 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationCheon, W., Han, M., Jeong, S., Oh, E. S., Lee, S. U., Lee, S. B., Shin, D., Lim, Y. K., Jeong, J. H., Kim, H., et al. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15133463 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
What’s in the box? A toolbox for safe deployment of artificial intelligence in veterinary medicine
Basran, P. S., & Appleby, R. B. (2024) · Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · doi:10.2460/javma.24.01.0027 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Chen, L., Xu, C., Lim, W. H., Sharma, A., Tiang, S. S., Chong, K. S., El‐kenawy, E. M., Alhussan, A. A., Eid, M. M., & Khafaga, D. S. (2025) · Engineering Science and Technology an International Journal · doi:10.1016/j.jestch.2025.102159 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Taiwo, O., & Al‐Bander, B. (2025) · Cognitive Computation and Systems · doi:10.1049/ccs2.12116 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Ataullah, M., & Chauhan, N. (2024) · Security and Privacy · doi:10.1002/spy2.448 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Utilization of Machine Learning Algorithms for the Strengthening of HIV Testing: A Systematic Review
Jaiteh, M., Phalane, E., Shiferaw, Y., Voet, K. A., & Phaswana-Mafuya, R. (2024) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a17080362 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Explainable AI-Based Feature Selection Approaches for Raman Spectroscopy
Rossberg, N., Gautam, R., Komolibus, K., O’Sullivan, B., & Visentin, A. (2025) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics15162063 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Garg, P. K., Krishna, M., Kulkarni, P., Horne, D. A., Salgia, R., & Singhal, S. S. (2025) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers17172799 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Ajin, R. S., Costache, R. D., Bărbulescu, A., Fanti, R., & Segoni, S. (2025) · Water · doi:10.3390/w17142041 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Ponsiglione, A. M., Zaffino, P., Ricciardi, C., Laura, D. D., Spadea, M. F., Tommasi, G. D., Improta, G., Romano, M., & Amato, F. (2024) · Progress in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1088/2516-1091/ad225a · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Pani, K., & Chawla, I. (2024) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109273 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Adversarial Examples on XAI-Enabled DT for Smart Healthcare Systems
Imam, N. H. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s24216891 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Nuzhat, T., Radzi, N. A. B. M., Maruthupandy, M., & Yussof, S. (2025) · Journal of Water Process Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.108760 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Badawy, M. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence Evolution · doi:10.37256/aie.4220232980 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Naik, D. S. B., & Dondeti, V. (2025) · Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications · doi:10.1007/s12083-024-01835-3 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Quantum Computing for Healthcare: A ReviewPreprint
Qayyum, A., Rasool, R. U., Ahmad, H. F., Rafique, W., Qadir, J., & Anwar, Z. (2022) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.17198702.v3 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationEnhancing Medicare Fraud Detection With a CNN-Transformer-XGBoost Framework and Explainable AI
Sakil, M. B. H., Hasan, M. A., Mozumder, M. S. A., Hasan, M. R., Opee, S. A., Mridha, M. F., & Aung, Z. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3562577 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Enhancing thyroid disease prediction with improved XGBoost model and bias management techniques
Dalal, S., Lilhore, U. K., Faujdar, N., Simaiya, S., Agrawal, A., Rani, U., V, & Mohan, A. (2024) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-024-19713-8 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Liu, S., Zhou, Y., Yang, X., Wang, X., & Yin, J. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13142727 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Applications of Deep Learning for Drug Discovery Systems with BigData
Matsuzaka, Y., & Yashiro, R. (2022) · BioMedInformatics · doi:10.3390/biomedinformatics2040039 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Quantum Computing for Healthcare: A ReviewPreprint
Rasool, R. U., Ahmad, H. F., Rafique, W., Qayyum, A., Qadir, J., & Anwar, Z. (2021) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.17198702 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationHoffman, H., Sims, J. J., Inoa‐Acosta, V., Hoit, D. A., Arthur, A. S., Draytsel, D. Y., Kim, Y. S., & Goyal, N. (2024) · Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery · doi:10.1136/jnis-2024-021759 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Chen, Z., Wang, Y., Ying, M. T. C., & Su, Z. (2024) · Journal of Nephrology · doi:10.1007/s40620-023-01878-4 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Subordination by Design: Rethinking Power, Policy, and Autonomy in Perioperative Nursing
Dunn, J. T. (2025) · Nursing Inquiry · doi:10.1111/nin.70043 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Golvirdizadeh, M., Nia, S. A. G., Shahbeik, H., Shafizadeh, A., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., Kiehbadroudinezhad, M., Seyedalikhani, S. A., Ahmadi, M., Hajiahmad, A., Tajuddin, S. A. F. S. A., et al. (2025) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2025.139708 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Use of AI as a Research Recruitment Tool: Ethical Elements, Considerations, and Recommendations
Rentzepis, P. J., Snyder, D. L., Baker, T. J., & Bierer, B. E. (2026) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2026.2649234 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Should AI-Enabled Medical Devices be Explainable?
Matulionytė, R., Nolan, P., Magrabi, F., & Beheshti, A. (2022) · International Journal of Law and Information Technology · doi:10.1093/ijlit/eaac015 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Healthcare Embedded System for Predicting Parkinson's Disease Based on AI of Things
Saleh, S., Cherradi, B., Laghmati, S., Gannour, O. E., Hamida, S., & Bouattane, O. (2023) · International Conference on Innovative Research in Applied Science, Engineering and Technology (IRASET) · doi:10.1109/iraset57153.2023.10153040 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Apostolidis, K. D., Kokkotis, C., Moustakidis, S., Karakasis, E., Sakellari, P., Koutra, C., Tsiptsios, D., Karatzetzou, S., Vadikolias, Κ., & Aggelousis, N. (2023) · Human-Centric Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s44230-023-00051-1 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Rethinking Data Distillation: Do Not Overlook Calibration
Zhu, D., Fang, Y., Lei, B., Xie, Y., Xu, D., Zhang, J., & Zhang, R. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00455 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Deep Learning for Image Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Esophageal Cancer
Theocharopoulos, C., Davakis, S., Ziogas, D. C., Theocharopoulos, A., Foteinou, D., Mylonakis, A., Katsaros, I., Gogas, H. J., & Charalabopoulos, A. (2024) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers16193285 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Quantum Computing for Healthcare: A ReviewPreprint
Qayyum, A., Rasool, R. U., Ahmad, H. F., Rafique, W., Qadir, J., & Anwar, Z. (2021) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.17198702.v2 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationMisgar, M. M., & Bhatia, M. P. S. (2024) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2024.106000 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Data science in healthcare: techniques, challenges and opportunities
Devi, P. P., & Bansal, K. L. (2024) · Health and Technology · doi:10.1007/s12553-024-00861-8 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Interpreting and generalizing deep learning in physics-based problems with functional linear models
Arzani, A., Yuan, L., Newell, P., & Bei, W. (2024) · Engineering With Computers · doi:10.1007/s00366-024-01987-z · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Towards explainability in artificial intelligence frameworks for heartcare: A comprehensive survey
Sreeja, M. U., Philip, A. O., & Supriya, M. H. (2024) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2024.102096 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rasheed, K., Qayyum, A., Ghaly, M., Al-Fuqaha, A., Razi, A., & Qadir, J.
- Affiliations
- Information Technology University (PK)
- Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA)
- Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA)
- Qatar University (QA)
- Corresponding author
- Qadir, Junaid
- Venue
- Computers in Biology and Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-10
- Volume
- 149
- Pages
- 106043
- ISSN
- 0010-4825 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4294839477
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 217
- Citations by year
- 2026: 77 · 2025: 134 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 5.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Computers in Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Qatar National Research Fund
- Qatar National Library
- Qatar Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Keywords
- explainable machine learning, model interpretability, health care, trustworthiness, ethical considerations, black-box models, clinical decision support, liability
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Delivery of Health Care, Health Facilities, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review