Green Public Procurement: Legal Instruments for Promoting Environmental Interests in the United States and European Union
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The finding that first green public tenders began after the adoption of Decision confirms Czarnezki (2019) conclusion that national/EU law should consider mandatory GPP criteria as an incentive to implement green/sustainable criteria in GPP.
“which confirms the conclusion from Czarnezki (2019) study where is highlighted that the national/EU law in Europe and the state/federal law in the USA should consider the introduction of mandatory GPP criteria as an incentive to implement green/sustainable criteria in GPP.”
From Analysis of Croatian public procurement notes: Green public procurement as a strategic tool to encourage sustainable food production (2024) · cites this paper as Czarnezki (2019)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Are EU Institutions Still Green Actors? An Empirical Study of Green Public Procurement
Badell, D., & Rosell, J. (2021) · JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies · doi:10.1111/jcms.13204 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Perica, M. (2024) · Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development · doi:10.24294/jipd10881
“…egg procurement after the adoption of the legal act Decision establishing possible criteria and relative weights which confirms the conclusion from Czarnezki (2019) study where is highlighted that the national/EU law in Europe and the state/federal law in the USA should consider the introduction…”
- Authors
- Czarnezki, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Pace University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Czarnezki, Jason J.
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2989633689
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Law › EU Law and Policy Analysis
- Keywords
- green public procurement, environmental law, public procurement, sustainable consumption and production, product life cycle, environmental externalities, free market competition, United States, European Union, comparative law
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
