Cited by 39Public Procurement and PolicyEuropean Union Policy and GovernanceSustainable Supply Chain Management

Are EU Institutions Still Green Actors? An Empirical Study of Green Public Procurement

Open access
Badell, Diego, Rosell, Jordi·2021·JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies

Abstract

Abstract Analysing the environmental actorness of the EU, more than one voice has spoken of the myth of a Green Europe and a dismantling process of its environmental ambitions. To date, any attempt to quantify this in a homogeneous fashion by different levels of government and institutions has run into serious difficulties. This research, however, uses green public procurement (GPP) as the research instrument to quantify the commitment to environmental policies. We construct the database from tenders published in the Supplement to the Official Journal between 2009 and 2019. Based on more than 743,061 observations, the article finds that the EU's institutions have the lowest GPP adoption rates in relation to all other levels of government. Moreover, it also records marked differences between the EU institutions where the European Parliament is performing better than the European Commission and, during Juncker Commission, EC performs worse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcms.13204

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Badell, D., & Rosell, J.
Affiliations
  • Institut Barcelona d'Estudis Internacionals (ES)
  • Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA) (ES)
Corresponding author
Rosell, Jordi
Venue
JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-06-17
Volume
59
Issue
6
Pages
1555-1572
ISSN
  • 0021-9886 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-5965
OpenAlex
W3174855178
Cited by
39
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Academica-e (Universidad Pública de Navarra) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Universitat de Girona Digital Repository (Universitat de Girona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PID2019‐104319RB‐I00)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Union Policy and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
green public procurement, EU institutions, environmental policy, European Parliament, European Commission, Juncker Commission, public tenders, official journal supplement, levels of government

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review