Cited by 71COVID-19 and Mental HealthIncome, Poverty, and InequalityEmployment and Welfare Studies

The COVID-19 Pandemic and its Impact on Inequality of Opportunity in Psychological Distress in the UK

Open access
Davillas, Apostolos, Jones, Andrew M.·2020·SSRN Electronic Journal

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3614940

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Bowling A., 1991. Measuring health: a review of quality of life measurement scales. Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
  2. Carrieri, V., Davillas, A., Jones, A.M., 2020. A latent class approach to inequity in health using biomarker data. Health Economics . http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.4022 . · DOI
  3. Carrieri, V., Jones, A.M., 2018. Inequality of opportunity in health: a decompositionbased approach. Health Economics . 27, 1981-1995. DOI: 10.1002/hec.3814 . · DOI
  4. Davillas, A., Jones, A.M., 2020. Ex ante inequality of opportunity in health, decomposition and distributional analysis of biomarkers. Journal of Health Economics. 69, 2020.
  5. Fajardo-Gonzalez, D.J., 2016. Inequality of opportunity in adult health in Colombia. Journal of Economic Inequality. 14, 395-416.
  6. Ferreira, F., Gignoux, J., 2011. The measurement of inequality of opportunity: theory and an application to Latin America. Review of Income and Wealth . 57, 622-657.
  7. Ferreira, F., Gignoux, J., 2013. The measurement of educational inequality: achievement and opportunity. World Bank Economic Review. 28, 210-246.
  8. Fleurbaey, M., Schokkaert, E., 2012. Equity in health and health care, in Barros, P., McGuire T., Pauly, M. (eds.), Handbook of Health Economics. Volume 2 , 1003-1092.
  9. Lefranc, A., Pistolesi, N., Trannoy, A., 2009. Equality of opportunity and luck: definitions and testable conditions, with an application to income in France. Journal of Public Economics . 93, 1189-1207.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davillas, A., & Jones, A. M.
Affiliations
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • University of York (GB)
Corresponding author
Davillas, Apostolos
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3033096018
Cited by
70
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 14
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Essex
  • Leverhulme Trust (MRF‐2016‐004)
  • Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, inequality of opportunity, psychological distress, General Health Questionnaire, financial stress, employment status, housing conditions, age and gender differences, household composition, parental occupation, UK Household Longitudinal Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review