Faultless Responsibility: On the Nature and Allocation of Moral Responsibility for Distributed Moral Actions
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Floridi proposed a principle of moral responsibility of faultless responsibility, meaning that no one is at fault but they are still responsible for it.
“Floridi proposed a principle of moral responsibility of faultless responsibility, which means that no one is at fault, but they are still responsible for it.”
From Ethics and governance of trustworthy medical artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [79]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI
Mittelstadt, B. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4 · Cited by 1,886 · see citing works
Ethics and governance of trustworthy medical artificial intelligence
Zhang, J., & Zhang, Z.-M. (2023) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-023-02103-9 · Cited by 507 · see citing works
- Authors
- Floridi, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Floridi, Luciano
- ORCID
- Floridi, Luciano
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 374
- Issue
- 2083
- Pages
- 20160112-20160112
- ISSN
- 1364-503X (ISSN-L)
- 1556-5068
- OpenAlex
- W2553338792
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 17.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Alan Turing Institute (TU/B/000055)
- Università degli Studi di Milano
- University of Oxford
- Universidade do Minho
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N02334X/1, EP/N023013/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Keywords
- allocation of responsibility, artificial agents, software platform, strict liability, backpropagation, common knowledge, intentionality
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Models, Theoretical, Morals, Social Responsibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
