PreprintCited by 2Handwritten Text Recognition TechniquesMachine Learning and AlgorithmsAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Confidence Estimation for Object Detection in Document Images

Open access
Boillet, Mélodie, Kermorvant, Christopher, Paquet, Thierry·2022·SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract

Deep neural networks are becoming increasingly powerful and large and require always more labelled data to be trained. However, since annotating data is time consuming, it is now necessary to develop systems that show good performance while learning on a limited amount of data. These data must be correctly chosen in order to obtain models that are still efficient. For this, the systems must be able to determine which data should be annotated in order to achieve the best results. In this paper, we propose three estimators to estimate the confidence of object detection predictions. The first two are based on Monte Carlo dropout and the third one on descriptive statistics. In active learning framework, the three estimators show a significant improvement in performance for the detection of document physical pages and text lines compared to a random selection of images. We also show that the proposed estimator based on descriptive statistics can replace MC dropout, reducing the computation cost without compromising the performances.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.4109846

Cites

18 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other applications such as document layout detection, pose estimation, and surface defect detection remain under-explored.

    “Other applications such as document layout detection [14,17], pose estimation [7], and surface defect detection [55] remain under-explored, as well.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. C. Tensmeyer, B. Davis, C. Wigington, I. Lee, B. Barrett, Pa- geNet: Page Boundary Extraction in Historical Handwritten Documents, in: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Historical Document Imaging and Processing, 2017, pp. 59- 64. doi:10.1145/3151509.3151522. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boillet, M., Kermorvant, C., & Paquet, T.
Affiliations
Laboratoire d'Informatique, du Traitement de l'Information et des Systèmes (FR)
Corresponding author
Boillet, Mélodie
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285308934
Cited by
2
References
17
Citations by year
2023: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Joint Programming Initiative on Cultural Heritage
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-JPCH-0006, ANR-17)
  • Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie
  • Norges Forskningsråd
  • Grand Équipement National De Calcul Intensif
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
confidence estimation, object detection, scanned documents, active learning (machine learning), Monte Carlo dropout, descriptive statistics, data annotation, text line detection, limited labeled data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review