Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
PreprintCited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Drivers of IAS 36 Disclosure Quality – Evidence from European Listed Firms

Coda, Stefano, Hossfeld, Christopher, Schmidt, Martin·2023

Abstract

This paper reports on an analysis of IAS 36 disclosure quality using a large sample of data from listed firms in France, Germany, Italy and the UK. We find that geographical diversification is positively associated with disclosure quality. Firms choose higher levels of disclosure quality when IAS 36 disclosures are more important, for example when the firm recognized an impairment loss on goodwill, PPE or intangible assets and when goodwill is greater. Disclosure quality is also positively associated with institutional ownership, board size, and the country’s regulatory quality. Surprisingly, leverage, appointing a Big4 audit firm or firm size is not associated with disclosure quality. Disclosure quality varies cross-sectionally by industry and country/stock market index. Disclosure quality is lower in France compared to the other three countries, and surprisingly, this effect appears to be driven by firms in the French blue-chip stock-market indices (CAC 40, CAC Next 20), where disclosure quality is lower. Overall, however, the disclosure quality shows considerable room for improvement. As such, our findings have implications for securities regulators and audit firms. Our findings are also important for academics, as our large cross-country sample and our measure of disclosure quality provides evidence of the drivers of disclosure quality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.4673390

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 1

Research works printed but not linked: 74

  1. ( Abschlusspr�feraufsichtstelle, 2019, Jahresbericht
  2. ( Abschlusspr�feraufsichtstelle, 2020, Jahresbericht
  3. ( Abschlusspr�feraufsichtstelle, 2021, Jahresbericht
  4. Acca, 2014, Worldwide application of IFRS 3, IAS 38 and IAS 36, related disclosures, and determinants of non-compliance
  5. Accor, 2016, Annual report. Acotel
  6. A Ahmed, 2023, Multiple capitals disclosure in European companies' integrated reports: the role of organisational complexity, Accounting in Europe, 20, 120, 10.1080/17449480.2022.2150979 · DOI
  7. B Al-Shammari, 2008, An investigation of compliance with international accounting standards by listed companies in the Gulf Co-Operation Council member states, The International Journal of Accounting, 43, 425, 10.1016/j.intacc.2008.09.003 · DOI
  8. H Amiraslani, 2013, Accounting for asset impairment: a test for IFRS compliance across Europe. A research report by the Centre for Financial Analysis and Reporting Research
  9. P Andr�, 2018, Mandated disclosures under IAS 36 Impairment of Assets and IAS 38 Intangible Assets: value relevance and impact on analysts' forecasts, Applied Economics, 50, 707, 10.1080/00036846.2017.1340570 · DOI
  10. 2014, Etude relative aux honoraires verses? aux commissaires aux comptes et � leur res?eau au titre de la periode 2013 par les groupes du CAC 40, de l'EURO STOXX 50 et d'un ec?hantillon de 40 societ�s? des compartiments b et c d'Euronext [Survey of fees paid to statutory auditors and their networks for 2013 by CAC 40 and EURO STOXX 50 companies and by a sample of 40 companies in the B and C compartments of Euronext, Autorit� des March�s Financiers (AMF
  11. B Baik, 2020, Organizational complexity, financial reporting complexity, and voluntary disclosure
  12. V Beattie, 2004, A methodology for analysing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: a comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes, Accounting Forum, 28, 205, 10.1016/j.accfor.2004.07.001 · DOI · Paper page
  13. D A Bens, 2011, The information content of goodwill impairments and SFAS 142, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 26, 527, 10.1177/0148558X11401551 · DOI
  14. M Bepari, 2014, Firms' compliance with the disclosure requirements of IFRS for goodwill impairment testing: effect of the global financial crisis and other firm characteristics, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 10, 116, 10.1108/JAOC-02-2011-0008 · DOI
  15. S Beretta, 2004, A framework for the analysis of firm risk communication, International Journal of Accounting, 39, 265, 10.1016/j.intacc.2004.06.006 · DOI · Paper page
  16. P Berger, 1995, Diversification's effect on firm value, Journal of Financial Economics, 37, 39, 10.1016/0304-405X(94)00798-6 · DOI · Paper page
  17. S Beretta, 2008, Quality versus quantity: the case of forward-looking disclosure, Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 23, 333, 10.1177/0148558X0802300304 · DOI · Paper page
  18. R Bhushan, 1989, Firm characteristics and analyst following, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11, 255, 10.1016/0165-4101(89)90008-6 · DOI · Paper page
  19. C A Botosan, 1997, Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital, The Accounting Review, 72, 323
  20. A L Boone, 2015, The effect of institutional ownership on firm transparency and information production, The Journal of Financial Economics, 117, 508, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.05.008 · DOI · Paper page
  21. R Bowen, 1995, Stakeholders' implicit claims and accounting method choice, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20, 255, 10.1016/0165-4101(95)00404-1 · DOI · Paper page
  22. P Brown, 2014, Measuring country differences in enforcement of accounting standards: An audit and enforcement proxy, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 41, 1, 10.1111/jbfa.12066 · DOI · Paper page
  23. P Brown, 2005, 2005 -It's here, ready or not: a review of the Australian financial reporting framework, Australian Accounting Review, 15, 68, 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2005.tb00294.x · DOI
  24. R Bushman, 2004, Financial accounting information, organizational complexity and corporate governance systems, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37, 167, 10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.09.005 · DOI · Paper page
  25. A P Cannizzaro, 2015, Multinational investment and voluntary disclosure: Project-level evidence from the petroleum industry, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 42, 32, 10.1016/j.aos.2015.01.002 · DOI
  26. C Carvalo, 2016, Goodwill and mandatory disclosure compliance: a critical review of the literature, Australian Accounting Review, 26, 376, 10.1111/auar.12129 · DOI
  27. S Chen, 2015, A new measure of disclosure quality: the level of disaggregation of accounting data in annual reports, Journal of Accounting Research, 53, 1017, 10.1111/1475-679X.12094 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Y.-L Cheung, 2010, A transparency disclosure index measuring disclosures: Chinese listed companies, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29, 259, 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.02.001 · DOI
  29. H Christensen, 2013, Mandatory IFRS reporting and changes in enforcement, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56, 147, 10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.10.007 · DOI · Paper page
  30. T E Cooke, 1989, Disclosure in the corporate annual reports of Swedish companies, Accounting and Business Research, 19, 113, 10.1080/00014788.1989.9728841 · DOI
  31. H Daske, 2006, International Financial Reporting Standards and experts' perceptions of disclosure quality, Abacus, 42, 461, 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2006.00211.x · DOI
  32. A Devalle, 2012, The quality of mandatory disclosure: the impairment of goodwill. An empirical analysis of European listed companies, Procedia Economics and Finance, 2, 101, 10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00069-X · DOI
  33. H Daske, 2013, Adopting a label: heterogeneity in the economic consequences around IAS/IFRS adoptions, Journal of Accounting Research, 51, 495, 10.1111/1475-679X.12005 · DOI · Paper page
  34. R Davidson, 2005, Internal governance structures and earnings management, Accounting and Finance, 45, 241
  35. P M Dechow, 1996, Causes and consequences of earnings manipulations: an analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC, Contemporary Accounting Research, 13, 1, 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00489.x · DOI · Paper page
  36. A Devalle, 2013, IFRS 3, IAS 36 and disclosure: the determinants of the quality of disclosure, GSTF Journal on Business Review (GBR), 2, 12
  37. A Devalle, 2016, Disclosure indexes and compliance with mandatory disclosure-The case of intangible assets in the Italian market, Advances in Accounting, incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 35, 8
  38. S Erdem, 2017, The main determinants of differences in compliance levels of disclosure items for IAS 16 in BIST, Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 15, 317, 10.1108/JFRA-10-2016-0076 · DOI
  39. 2023, Report -27 th Extract from the EECS's Database of Enforcement, European Securities and Market Authorities (ESMA), 29
  40. Public Statement -European common enforcement priorities for 2023 annual financial reports, 25 October
  41. C Fernandes, 2013, Divulga��o de informa��o sobre ativos intang�?veis, concentra��es de atividades empresariais e goodwill: evid�ncia emp�rica nas empresas cotadas na bolsa de valores Portuguesa [Dissemination of information on intangible assets, business combinations and goodwill: empirical evidence in companies listed on the Portuguese stock exchange, XIV Congresso Internacional de Contabilidade e Auditoria
  42. A S Gaur, 2009, International diversification, business group affiliation and firm performance: Empirical evidence from India, British Journal of Management, 20, 172, 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00558.x · DOI · Paper page
  43. A Ghasempour, 2014, The effect of fundamental determinants on voluntary disclosures of financial and nonfinancial information: the case of internet reporting on the Tehran stock exchange, The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 14, 37, 10.4192/1577-8517-v14_2 · DOI
  44. M Glaum, 2013, Introduction of International Accounting Standards, disclosure quality and accuracy of analysts' earnings forecasts, European Accounting Review, 22, 79, 10.1080/09638180.2011.558301 · DOI
  45. M Glaum, 2013, Compliance with IFRS 3-and IAS 36-required disclosures across 17 European countries: company-and country-level determinants, Accounting and Business Research, 43, 162, 10.1080/00014788.2012.711131 · DOI · Paper page
  46. M Glaum, 2003, Compliance with the disclosure requirements of Germany's New Market: IAS versus US GAAP, Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 14, 64, 10.1111/1467-646X.00090 · DOI · Paper page
  47. S J Grossmann, 1982, Corporate Financial Structure and Managerial Incentives, The Economics of Information and Uncertainty, 107
  48. O A G Hassan, 2019, Corporate financial disclosure measurement in the empirical accounting literature: a review article, The International Journal of Accounting, 54
  49. C Hodgdon, 2008, Compliance with IFRS disclosure requirements and individual analysts' forecast errors, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation, 17, 1, 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2008.01.002 · DOI
  50. 2023, Guidance for developing and drafting Disclosure Requirements in IFRS Accounting Standards, International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)
  51. H Isidro, 2020, On the Relation between Financial Reporting Quality and Country Attributes: Research Challenges and Opportunities, The Accounting Review, 95, 279, 10.2308/accr-52607 · DOI
  52. A Jaafar, 2007, Country effects and sector effects on the harmonization of accounting policy choice, Abacus, 43, 156, 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2007.00224.x · DOI
  53. M C Jensen, 1976, Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305, 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X · DOI · Paper page
  54. A Klein, 2002, Audit committee, board of directors' characteristics, and earnings management, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33, 375, 10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00059-9 · DOI · Paper page
  55. P.-S Koh, 2007, Accountability and value enhancement roles of corporate governance, Accounting & Finance, 47, 305, 10.1111/j.1467-629X.2006.00207.x · DOI
  56. K Krippendorff, 2013, Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology
  57. C Leuz, 2010, Different approaches to corporate reporting regulation: how jurisdictions differ and why, Accounting and Business Research, 40, 229, 10.1080/00014788.2010.9663398 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Y Lin, 2018, Institutional ownership, peer pressure, and voluntary disclosure, The Accounting Review, 93, 283, 10.2308/accr-51945 · DOI
  59. G J Lobo, 2017, The effect of joint auditor pair composition on audit quality: evidence from impairment tests, Contemporary Accounting Research, 34, 118, 10.1111/1911-3846.12244 · DOI
  60. D Margaritis, 2007, Capital Structure and Firm Efficiency, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34, 1447, 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2007.02056.x · DOI · Paper page
  61. F Mazzi, 2017, Compliance with goodwillrelated mandatory disclosure requirements and the cost of equity capital, Accounting and Business Research, 47, 268, 10.1080/00014788.2016.1254593 · DOI
  62. F Mazzi, 2018, The effect of corruption and culture on mandatory disclosure compliance levels: goodwill reporting in Europe, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 31, 52, 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2018.06.001 · DOI
  63. M J Milne, 1999, Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 12, 237, 10.1108/09513579910270138 · DOI · Paper page
  64. M Paananen, 2009, Fair value accounting for goodwill under IFRS: an exploratory study of the comparability in France, Germany and the United Kingdom, 32 nd EAA Annual Congress
  65. L E Papke, 1996, Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, 619, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199611)11:6<619::AID-JAE418>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI
  66. L Paugam, 2015, Effect of impairment-testing disclosures on the cost of equity capital, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 42, 583, 10.1111/jbfa.12113 · DOI
  67. K V Peasnell, 2000, Accrual management to meet earnings targets: UK evidence pre-and post-Cadbury, British Accounting Review, 32, 415, 10.1006/bare.2000.0134 · DOI
  68. R.-W Sarquis, 2021, Joint venture investments: An analysis of the level of compliance with the disclosure requirements of IFRS 12, Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 32, 207, 10.1111/jifm.12130 · DOI
  69. K Schipper, 2003, Earnings quality, Accounting Horizons, 17, 97, 10.2308/acch.2003.17.s-1.97 · DOI · Paper page
  70. M Schmidt, 2017, Aligning Financial and Management Accounting Policies: What Drives Integration? -Empirical Evidence from German IFRS 8 Segment Reports, Advances in Management Accounting, 28, 155, 10.1108/S1474-787120170000028006 · DOI
  71. D Street, 2000, Disclosure level and compliance with IASs: a comparison of companies with and without U.S. listings and filings, The International Journal of Accounting, 35, 305, 10.1016/S0020-7063(00)00060-1 · DOI
  72. D L Street, 2002, Factors influencing the extent of corporate compliance with International Accounting Standards: summary of a research monograph, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation, 11, 51, 10.1016/S1061-9518(02)00054-X · DOI
  73. A Vanstraelen, 2003, Corporate non-financial disclosure practices and financial analyst forecast ability across three European countries, Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 14, 249, 10.1111/1467-646X.00098 · DOI · Paper page
  74. B Xie, 2003, Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and audit committee, Journal of Corporate Finance, 9, 295, 10.1016/S0929-1199(02)00006-8 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Coda, S., Hossfeld, C., & Schmidt, M.
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023
Cited by
1
Type
Preprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drivers of IAS 36 Disclosure Quality – Evidence from European Listed Firms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2139/ssrn.4673390
The paper
Coda, S., Hossfeld, C., & Schmidt, M. (2023). Drivers of IAS 36 Disclosure Quality – Evidence from European Listed Firms. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4673390

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.