CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 93Cybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesDigitalization, Law, and RegulationCybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies

Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace

Open access
Deibert, Ronald, Palfrey, John, Rohozinski, Rafal, Zittrain, Jonathan L.·2010·CrimRxiv
DOI 10.21428/cb6ab371.3d7364a1
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21428/cb6ab371.3d7364a1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kenya's 2014 Communications Act criminalizes publishing information deemed unlawful by authorities, and Burundi's 2018 media law requires journalists to 'transmit information in a [...] faithful manner.'

    “For instance, Kenya's 2014 Communications Act criminalizes publishing information deemed unlawful by authorities, and Burundi's 2018 media law requires journalists to “transmit information in a […] faithful manner.”110”

    From Legalizing control: the rise of restrictive internet regulation in sub-Saharan Africa (2026) · cites this paper as [110]

  • Whether autocrats monitor openly or not, news websites, opposition actors, and citizens usually know they are being watched, which can lead to self-censorship.

    “Whether autocrats monitor openly or not, news websites, opposition actors, and citizens usually know that they are being watched, which can ultimately lead to self-censorship (Deibert & Rohozinski, 2010).”

    From How Dictators Control the Internet: A Review Essay (2020) · cites this paper as Deibert & Rohozinski, 2010

  • Digital and social media offer important new tools for social movements, activists, and state critics as well as substantial avenues for expanding state surveillance and suppression of those same actors.

    “Digital and social media offer important new tools for social movements, activists, and state critics (1) as well as substantial avenues for expanding state surveillance and suppression of those same actors (2, 3).”

    From Physical and virtual repertoires of contention (2022) · cites this paper as [2]

  • Nation states' use of digital surveillance is long-standing and well-documented.

    “Nation states’ use of digital surveillance (Table 1, cell 2) is long-standing and well-documented (2, 3, 52).”

    From Physical and virtual repertoires of contention (2022) · cites this paper as [2]

  • Corporate actions may be compelled through state ownership structures, domestic laws, or orders to private telecom companies to restrict specific topics or cut access to citizens.

    “Corporate actions may also be compelled, whether through state ownership structures, domestic laws, or orders to private telecom companies, to restrict specific topics or cut access to citizens (2, 3, 130, 131).”

    From Physical and virtual repertoires of contention (2022) · cites this paper as [2]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Deibert, R., Palfrey, J., Rohozinski, R., & Zittrain, J. L.
ORCID
Venue
CrimRxiv
Publisher
PubPub
Published
2010-04-01
DOI
10.21428/cb6ab371.3d7364a1
OpenAlex
W4298839379
Cited by
91
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
CrimRxiv (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Keywords
cyberspace, access control, power, rights, rules, digital governance, cyber law

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review