Cited by 1,461Legal processes and jurisprudenceResearch, Science, and AcademiaCriminal Law and Evidence

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward

Open access

Council, National Research·2009·CrimRxiv

DOI 10.21428/cb6ab371.b2d683d2

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21428/cb6ab371.b2d683d2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Sorted by citations

The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions.
Kassin, S. M., Dror, I. E., & Kukucka, J. (2013) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.001 · Cited by 634
Face recognition accuracy of forensic examiners, superrecognizers, and face recognition algorithms
Phillips, P. J., Yates, A. N., Hu, Y., Hahn, C. A., Noyes, E., Jackson, K., Cavazos, J. G., Jeckeln, G., Ranjan, R., Sankaranarayanan, S., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1721355115 · Cited by 461
The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law
Tiersma, P. M., & Solan, L. M. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.001.0001 · Cited by 382
Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation
Dror, I. E., & Hampikian, G. (2011) · Science & Justice · doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2011.08.004 · Cited by 348
Leading Causes of Unintentional and Intentional Injury Mortality: United States, 2000–2009
Rockett, I. R. H., Regier, M., Kapusta, N. D., Coben, J. H., Miller, T. R., Hanzlick, R. L., Todd, K. H., Sattin, R. W., Kennedy, L. W., Kleinig, J., et al. (2012) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2012.300960 · Cited by 225
Validating TrueAllele ® DNA Mixture Interpretation* ,†
Perlin, M. W., Legler, M. M., Spencer, C. E., Smith, J. L., Allan, W. P., Belrose, J. L., & Duceman, B. W. (2011) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01859.x · Cited by 228
Chemometrics in forensic science
Kumar, R., & Sharma, V. (2018) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2018.05.010 · Cited by 224
Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review
Cooper, G. S., & Meterko, V. (2019) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.016 · Cited by 214
Are forensic experts biased by the side that retained them?
Murrie, D. C., Boccaccini, M. T., Guarnera, L. A., & Rufino, K. A. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797613481812 · Cited by 286
Perceptual expertise in forensic facial image comparison
White, D., Phillips, P. J., Hahn, C. A., Hill, M., & O'Toole, A. J. (2015) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.1292 · Cited by 121
Letter to the Editor— Context Management Toolbox: A Linear Sequential Unmasking ( LSU ) Approach for Minimizing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decision Making
Dror, I. E., Thompson, W. C., Meissner, C. A., Kornfield, I., Krane, D., Saks, M., & Risinger, M. (2015) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12805 · Cited by 185
Cognitive bias and blindness: A global survey of forensic science examiners.
Kukucka, J., Kassin, S. M., Zapf, P. A., & Dror, I. E. (2017) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001 · Cited by 180
The vision in "blind" justice: Expert perception, judgment, and visual cognition in forensic pattern recognition
Dror, I. E., & Cole, S. A. (2010) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.17.2.161 · Cited by 172
“Journal Forensic Sciences, 54, 571-582. Leo, W. F. (2001). Fingerprint identification: Objective science or sub-”
Background
Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems
Morrison, G. S. (2011) · Science & Justice · doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2011.03.002 · Cited by 166
The use of geoscience methods for terrestrial forensic searches
Pringle, J. K., RUFFELL, A. H., Jervis, J. R., Donnelly, L. J., McKinley, J. M., Hansen, J., Morgan, R. M., Pirrie, D., & Harrison, M. (2012) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.05.006 · Cited by 158
Quantifying the Weight of Evidence from a Forensic Fingerprint Comparison: A New Paradigm
Neumann, C., Evett, I. W., & Skerrett, J. E. (2012) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2011.01027.x · Cited by 156
Longitudinal study of fingerprint recognition
Yoon, S., & Jain, A. K. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1410272112 · Cited by 151
Intelligence-led crime scene processing. Part I: Forensic intelligence
Olivier Ribaux, A., Baylon, A., Roux, C. P., Delémont, O., Lock, E., Zingg, C., & Margot, P. A. (2009) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.10.027 · Cited by 149
Unanalyzed evidence in law‐enforcement agencies
Strom, K. J., & Hickman, M. J. (2010) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00635.x · Cited by 148
From Forensics to Forensic Science
Roux, C. P., Crispino, F., & Olivier Ribaux, A. (2012) · Current Issues in Criminal Justice · doi:10.1080/10345329.2012.12035941 · Cited by 146
The Plain Language Movement
Adler, M. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0006 · Cited by 160
Rethinking the Reliability of Eyewitness Memory
Wixted, J. T., Mickes, L., & Fisher, R. P. (2018) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617734878 · Cited by 138
Current and future directions of DNA in wildlife forensic science
Johnson, R. N., Wilson-Wilde, L., & Linacre, A. M. T. (2014) · Forensic Science International Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.12.007 · Cited by 132
Suicide Risk and Precipitating Circumstances Among Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Male Veterans
Kaplan, M. S., McFarland, B. H., Huguet, N., & Valenstein, M. M. (2012) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2011.300445 · Cited by 129
Population variation in skeletal sexual dimorphism
Ubelaker, D. H. V., & DeGaglia, C. M. S. (2017) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.06.012 · Cited by 130
Intelligence-led crime scene processing. Part II: Intelligence and crime scene examination
Olivier Ribaux, A., Baylon, A., Lock, E., Delémont, O., Roux, C. P., Zingg, C., & Margot, P. A. (2010) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.03.011 · Cited by 123
Identifying Fingerprint Expertise
Tangen, J. M., Thompson, M. B., & McCarthy, D. J. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611414729 · Cited by 118
Analytical Validation of a Portable Mass Spectrometer Featuring Interchangeable, Ambient Ionization Sources for High Throughput Forensic Evidence Screening
Lawton, Z. E., Traub, A., Fatigante, W. L., Mancias, J., O’Leary, A. E., Hall, S. E., Wieland, J. R., Oberacher, H., Gizzi, M. C., & Mulligan, C. C. (2016) · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1007/s13361-016-1562-2 · Cited by 116
Chemometrics in forensic science: approaches and applications
Sauzier, G., van Bronswijk, W., & Lewis, S. W. (2021) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/d1an00082a · Cited by 115
Forensic psychologists’ perceptions of bias and potential correction strategies in forensic mental health evaluations
Neal, T. M. S., & Brodsky, S. L. (2016) · Psychology, Public Policy, and Law · doi:10.1037/law0000077 · Cited by 114
Linguistic Human Rights
Skutnabb‐Kangas, T. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0017 · Cited by 114
Recent advances in forensic anthropology: decomposition research
Wescott, D. J. (2018) · Forensic Sciences Research · doi:10.1080/20961790.2018.1488571 · Cited by 111
Digital media triage with bulk data analysis and bulk_extractor
Garfinkel, S. (2012) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2012.09.011 · Cited by 109
Challenges in digital forensics
Vincze, E. A. (2016) · Police Practice and Research · doi:10.1080/15614263.2015.1128163 · Cited by 108
Using Brain Imaging for Lie Detection: Where Science, Law and Research Policy Collide.
Langleben, D. D., & Moriarty, J. C. (2013) · PubMed · doi:10.1037/a0028841 · Cited by 108
“It also finds the judiciary to be “utterly ineffective” in requiring forensic scientists to prove the validity of their methods and the accuracy of their conclusions (National Research Council, 2009).”
The Curious Complexity between Confidence and Accuracy in Reports from Memory
Roediger, H. L., III, Wixted, J. T., & DeSoto, K. A. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199920754.003.0004 · Cited by 106
Error and its Meaning in Forensic Science
Christensen, A. M., Crowder, C. M., Ousley, S. D., & Houck, M. M. (2014) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12275 · Cited by 106
Evidence evaluation: A response to the court of appeal judgment in R v T
Berger, C. E. H., Buckleton, J., Champod, C., Evett, I. W., & Jackson, G. (2011) · Science & Justice · doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2011.03.005 · Cited by 102
“The recent report of the US National Academy of Sciences [29] also drew attention to the dangers of using tendentious, or even fallacious, terminology, to the extent that its authors felt the need to make a specific recommendation on the subject.”
Confessions That Corrupt
Kassin, S. M., Bogart, D. E., & Kerner, J. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611422918 · Cited by 102
Information‐Theoretical Assessment of the Performance of Likelihood Ratio Computation Methods
Ramos, D., González-Rodríguez, J., Zadora, G., & Aitken, C. G. G. (2013) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12233 · Cited by 102
The international development of forensic science standards — A review
Wilson-Wilde, L. (2018) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.009 · Cited by 103
The end of the (forensic science) world as we know it? The example of trace evidence
Roux, C. P., Talbot-Wright, B., Robertson, J. A., Crispino, F., & Olivier Ribaux, A. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0260 · Cited by 100
Elliptical Fourier analysis: fundamentals, applications, and value for forensic anthropology
Caple, J., Byrd, J., & Stephan, C. N. (2017) · International Journal of Legal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00414-017-1555-0 · Cited by 104
Error rates in forensic DNA analysis: Definition, numbers, impact and communication
Kloosterman, A., Sjerps, M. J., & Quak, A. (2014) · Forensic Science International Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.04.014 · Cited by 98
On the interpretation of likelihood ratios in forensic science evidence: Presentation formats and the weak evidence effect
Martire, K. A., Kemp, R. I., Sayle, M., & Newell, B. R. (2014) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.04.005 · Cited by 98
Uniqueness in the forensic identification sciences—Fact or fiction?
Page, M., Taylor, J. A., & Blenkin, M. (2010) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.08.004 · Cited by 98
Effect of Forensic Evidence on Criminal Justice Case Processing
Peterson, J. L., Hickman, M. J., Strom, K. J., & Johnson, D. J. (2012) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12020 · Cited by 97
The Potential of High‐throughput Metagenomic Sequencing of Aquatic Bacterial Communities to Estimate the Postmortem Submersion Interval
Benbow, M. E., Pechal, J. L., Lang, J. M., Erb, R., & Wallace, J. R. (2015) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12859 · Cited by 95
A hierarchy of expert performance.
Dror, I. E. (2016) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.03.001 · Cited by 116
Understanding and Mitigating Bias in Forensic Evaluation: Lessons from Forensic Science
Zapf, P. A., & Dror, I. E. (2017) · International Journal of Forensic Mental Health · doi:10.1080/14999013.2017.1317302 · Cited by 105
“Neal (2016) surveyed forensic evaluators to determine the impact of attitudes towards capital punishment on willingness to accept referrals from various adversarial parties.”
BackgroundMethod
The Effect of Incomplete Death Certificates on Estimates of Unintentional Opioid-Related Overdose Deaths in the United States, 1999-2015
Buchanich, J. M., Balmert, L. C., Williams, K. E., & Burke, D. S. (2018) · Public Health Reports · doi:10.1177/0033354918774330 · Cited by 93
Next frontiers of research in data driven marketing: Will techniques keep up with data tsunami?
Sheth, J. N., & Kellstadt, C. H. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.050 · Cited by 94
Bridging the gap: from biometrics to forensics
Jain, A. K., & Ross, A. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0254 · Cited by 71
Discourse in the us Courtroom
Stygall, G. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0027 · Cited by 91
The current role of mass spectrometry in forensics and future prospects
Brown, H. M., McDaniel, T. J., Fedick, P. W., & Mulligan, C. C. (2020) · Analytical Methods · doi:10.1039/d0ay01113d · Cited by 89
Police Organization Continuity and Change: Into the Twenty‐first Century
Mastrofski, S. D., & Willis, J. J. (2010) · Crime and Justice · doi:10.1086/653046 · Cited by 91
The Grammar And Structure Of Legal Texts
Hiltunen, R. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0004 · Cited by 87
Age estimation using CT imaging of the third molar tooth, the medial clavicular epiphysis, and the spheno-occipital synchondrosis: A multifactorial approach
Bassed, R., Briggs, C. A., & Drummer, O. H. (2011) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.06.007 · Cited by 85
Discussion on how to implement a verbal scale in a forensic laboratory: Benefits, pitfalls and suggestions to avoid misunderstandings
Marquis, R., Biedermann, A., Cadola, L., Champod, C., Gueissaz, L., Massonnet, G., Mazzella, W., Taroni, F., & Hicks, T. (2016) · Science & Justice · doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2016.05.009 · Cited by 85
Urban–Rural Differences in Suicide in the State of Maryland: The Role of Firearms
Nestadt, P. S., Triplett, P. T., Fowler, D. R., & Mojtabai, R. (2017) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2017.303865 · Cited by 85
Jury decision‐making biases and methods to counter them
Daftary‐Kapur, T., Dumas, R., & Penrod, S. (2009) · Legal and Criminological Psychology · doi:10.1348/135532509x465624 · Cited by 84
The National Problem of Untested Sexual Assault Kits (SAKs): Scope, Causes, and Future Directions for Research, Policy, and Practice
Campbell, R., Feeney, H., Fehler‐Cabral, G., Shaw, J., & Horsford, S. R. (2015) · Trauma Violence & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838015622436 · Cited by 90
Practical Solutions to Cognitive and Human Factor Challenges in Forensic Science
Dror, I. E. (2013) · Forensic Science Policy & Management An International Journal · doi:10.1080/19409044.2014.901437 · Cited by 82
Framing innocence: an experimental test of the effects of wrongful convictions on public opinion
Norris, R. J., & Mullinix, K. J. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-019-09360-7 · Cited by 81
Advanced Scientific Methods and Procedures in the Forensic Investigation of Clandestine Graves
Larson, D. O., Vass, A. A., & Wise, M. (2011) · Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice · doi:10.1177/1043986211405885 · Cited by 81
Law's Looking Glass: Expert Identification Evidence Derived from Photographic and Video Images
Biber, K., Edmond, G., Kemp, R. I., & Porter, G. (2009) · UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) · Cited by 81
The management of domain irrelevant context information in forensic handwriting examination casework
Found, B. J., & Ganas, J. (2012) · Science & Justice · doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2012.10.004 · Cited by 81
Rapid analysis of trace drugs and metabolites using a thermal desorption DART-MS configuration
Sisco, E., Forbes, T. P., Staymates, M. E., & Gillen, G. J. (2016) · Analytical Methods · doi:10.1039/c6ay01851c · Cited by 79
Human expert performance in forensic decision making: Seven different sources of bias
Dror, I. E. (2017) · Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1080/00450618.2017.1281348 · Cited by 79
Recommendations for Toxicological Investigation of Drug-Impaired Driving and Motor Vehicle Fatalities—2017 Update
Logan, B. K., D’Orazio, A. L., Mohr, A. L. A., Limoges, J. F., Miles, A. K., Scarneo, C. E., Kerrigan, S., Liddicoat, L. J., Scott, K. S., & Huestis, M. A. (2018) · Journal of Analytical Toxicology · doi:10.1093/jat/bkx082 · Cited by 78
Forensic Stable Isotope Biogeochemistry
Cerling, T. E., Barnette, J. E., Bowen, G. J., Chesson, L. A., Ehleringer, J. R., Remien, C. H., Shea, P., Tipple, B. J., & West, J. B. (2016) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-060115-012303 · Cited by 79
The Language of Crime
Tiersma, P., & Solan, L. M. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0025 · Cited by 81
Sex Determination Based on Raman Spectroscopy of Saliva Traces for Forensic Purposes
Muro, C. K., Fernandes, L. D. S., & Lednev, I. K. (2016) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03988 · Cited by 76
A history of forensic anthropology.
Ubelaker, D. (2018) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.23306 · Cited by 58
Forensic culture as epistemic culture: The sociology of forensic science
Cole, S. A. (2012) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2012.09.003 · Cited by 75
Present and foreseeable future of metabolomics in forensic analysis
Castillo-Peinado, L. S., & de Castro, M. D. L. (2016) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2016.04.040 · Cited by 79
Confronting Death From Drug Self-Intoxication (DDSI): Prevention Through a Better Definition
Rockett, I. R. H., Smith, G. S., Caine, E. D., Kapusta, N. D., Hanzlick, R. L., Larkin, G. L., Naylor, C., Nolte, K. B., Miller, T. R., Putnam, S. L., et al. (2014) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2014.302244 · Cited by 72
Human Factors Effecting Forensic Decision Making: Workplace Stress and Well‐being
Jeanguenat, A. M., & Dror, I. E. (2017) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.13533 · Cited by 82
Forensic Evidence in Homicide Investigations and Prosecutions
McEwen, T., & Regoeczi, W. C. (2015) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12787 · Cited by 71
On a taxonomy of facial features
Klare, B. F., & Jain, A. K. (2010) · IEEE International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS) · doi:10.1109/btas.2010.5634533 · Cited by 71
“A report from the National Academy of Sciences on forensics [8] highlights the need for such individuality studies not only for fingerprints but for other biometric traits as well.”
Background
Expertise in Fingerprint Identification
Thompson, M. B., Tangen, J. M., & McCarthy, D. J. (2013) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12203 · Cited by 71
An Information Gap in DNA Evidence Interpretation
Perlin, M. W., & Sinelnikov, A. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008327 · Cited by 71
“For objectivity [24], we always first infer a genotype (committing to an answer at all loci), and only afterwards in a second step match it against another genotype [25].”
Background
Bayes and the Law
Fenton, N., Neil, M., & Berger, D. (2016) · Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application · doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-041715-033428 · Cited by 70
Forensic DNA Typing
Murphy, E. (2017) · Annual Review of Criminology · doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092127 · Cited by 70
Skeletal Identification by Radiographic Comparison: Blind Tests of a Morphoscopic Method Using Antemortem Chest Radiographs* ,†,‡
Stephan, C. N., Winburn, A. P., Christensen, A. F., & Tyrrell, A. J. (2011) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01673.x · Cited by 69
The need to incorporate human variation and evolutionary theory in forensic anthropology: A call for reform
Ross, A. H., & Pilloud, M. A. (2021) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.24384 · Cited by 68
The forensic confirmation bias: A comparison between experts and novices
van den Eeden, C. A. J., de Poot, C. J., & van Koppen, P. J. (2019) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.13817 · Cited by 68
Forensic Science
Brettell, T. A., Butler, J. M., & Almirall, J. R. (2011) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac201075e · Cited by 69
Implementing context information management in forensic casework: Minimizing contextual bias in firearms examination
Mattijssen, E. J. A. T., Kerkhoff, W., Berger, C. E. H., Dror, I. E., & Stoel, R. D. (2015) · Science & Justice · doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2015.11.004 · Cited by 67
Critical review of forensic trace evidence analysis and the need for a new approach
Stoney, D. A., & Stoney, P. L. (2015) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.03.022 · Cited by 66
A call for more science in forensic science
Bell, S., Sah, S., Albright, T. D., Gates, S. J., Jr., Denton, M. B., & Casadevall, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1712161115 · Cited by 71
Microscopic Analysis of Sharp Force Trauma in Bone and Cartilage: A Validation Study,,
Crowder, C. M., Rainwater, C. W., & Fridie, J. S. (2013) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12180 · Cited by 64
Use of DNA testing in police investigative work for increasing offender identification, arrest, conviction and case clearance
Wilson, D. B., Weisburd, D. L., & McClure, D. (2011) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.4073/csr.2011.7 · Cited by 64
Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence
Morgan, J. (2023) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.15233 · Cited by 63
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics for the characterization and discrimination of writing/photocopier paper types: Application in forensic document examinations
Kumar, R., Kumar, V., & Sharma, V. (2016) · Spectrochimica Acta Part A Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.saa.2016.06.042 · Cited by 63
Is PMI the Hypothesis or the Null Hypothesis?
Tarone, A. M., & Sanford, M. R. (2017) · Journal of Medical Entomology · doi:10.1093/jme/tjx119 · Cited by 63
Professionalism in Crime Scene Examination: The Seven Key Attributes of Top Crime Scene Examiners
Kelty, S. F., Julian, R., & Robertson, J. A. (2011) · Forensic Science Policy & Management An International Journal · doi:10.1080/19409044.2012.693572 · Cited by 62
Fifty Years of Multilingual Interpretation in the European Union
Baaij, C. J. W. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0016 · Cited by 61
The Evaluation of Fatty Acid Ratios in Latent Fingermarks by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry ( GC / MS ) Analysis
Michalski, S., Shaler, R. C., & Dorman, F. L. (2012) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12010 · Cited by 61
Recommendations for Toxicological Investigation of Drug-Impaired Driving and Motor Vehicle Fatalities—2021 Update
D’Orazio, A. L., Mohr, A. L. A., Chan-Hosokawa, A., Harper, C., Huestis, M. A., Limoges, J. F., Miles, A. K., Scarneo, C. E., Kerrigan, S., Liddicoat, L. J., et al. (2021) · Journal of Analytical Toxicology · doi:10.1093/jat/bkab064 · Cited by 60

Authors: Council, N. R.
Venue: CrimRxiv
Publisher: PubPub
Published: 2009-07-01
DOI: 10.21428/cb6ab371.b2d683d2
OpenAlex: W4248170299
Cited by: 1,461
References: 0
Citations by year: 2026: 33 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 106 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 119 · 2016: 107 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 88 · 2013: 95 · 2012: 110
FWCI: 154.52
Type: book
Language: en
Open access: green
doi.org
Licence: cc-by
Locations: National Academies Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
CrimRxiv (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics: Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Law and Evidence
Keywords: forensic science, forensic evidence, evidence evaluation, forensic science policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Citations

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks