Cited by 31Online Learning and AnalyticsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningEvaluation of Teaching Practices

Pedagogical design: Bridging learning theory and learning analytics

Open access
Banihashem, Kazem, Macfadyen, Leah P.·2021·Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology

Abstract

Which learning analytics (LA) approach might be the best choice for your teaching and learning context? Learning analytics as a field of research and application seeks to collect, analyze, report, and interpret educational data with the goal of improving teaching and learning. But hasty adoption of learning analytics tools and methods that are simply convenient, promoted or available risks allowing learning analytics to ‘drive the pedagogical bus’. In this paper, we propose that careful reflection on pedagogical design choices and the learning theory that underpins them can and should inform selection of relevant learning analytics tools and approaches. We broadly review established learning theories and the implications of each for pedagogical design; for each design approach we offer examples of learning analytics most clearly aligned with the theoretical perspectives on learning and knowledge that have shaped it. Moreover, we argue that careful consideration of the learning theory underpinning the pragmatics of pedagogical design choices should guide LA implementation, and help educators and designers avoid the risk of gathering data on, and measuring outcomes for, activities that are not relevant to their pedagogical design or goals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21432/cjlt27959

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If we do not know who are the LA stakeholders and what are the pedagogical reasons for LA application, then we cannot expect to collect the required and appropriate data.

    “If we do not know who are the LA stakeholders and what are the pedagogical reasons for LA application, then, we cannot expect to collect the required and appropriate data (Banihashem & Macfadyen, 2021).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 82 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Currie, G. (2004). Cognitivism. In T. Miller & R. Stam (Eds.), A companion to film theory (pp. 105- 122).
  2. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction. Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
  3. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 215- 239).
  4. Mazur, J. E. (2016). Learning and behavior (8th ed.). Routledge.
  5. Parker, K. H. (2009). Constructivist learning design: A qualitative study of learning theory and at-rsk student academic success. [Doctoral dissertation, Capella University]. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (3355349). https://www.proquest.com/openview/acfa703c696a3e9a9148a5f8a0262016/1?pq- origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
  6. Smith, M. (1999-2020). Learning theory. In M. Smith (Ed.), The encyclopedia of pedagogy and informal education. https://infed.org/mobi/learning-theory-models-product-and-process/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banihashem, K., & Macfadyen, L. P.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology
Published
2021-08-09
Volume
47
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1499-6677 (ISSN-L)
  • 1499-6685
OpenAlex
W3192299020
Cited by
31
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
learning analytics, instructional design, learning theory, educational data, education data collection, learning outcomes measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review