Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the selection of the impulse responses for distant-speech recognition based on contaminated speech training

Ravanelli, Mirco, Omologo, Maurizio·2014·Interspeech 2014

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21437/interspeech.2014-268

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 25

Metadata

Authors
Ravanelli, M., & Omologo, M.
Venue
Interspeech 2014
Publisher
ISCA
Published
2014-09-14
Pages
1028-1032
ISSN
2308-457X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2402865896
Cited by
22
References
13
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5
FWCI
3.32
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Interspeech (USB) (publishedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
Keywords
distant speech recognition, speech recognition training data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the selection of the impulse responses for distant-speech recognition based on contaminated speech training. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21437/interspeech.2014-268
The paper
Ravanelli, M., & Omologo, M. (2014). On the selection of the impulse responses for distant-speech recognition based on contaminated speech training. Interspeech 2014. https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2014-268

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.