The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Light Gated Recurrent Units for Speech Recognition
Open accessAbstract
A field that has directly benefited from the recent advances in deep learning is automatic speech recognition (ASR). Despite the great achievements of the past decades, however, a natural and robust human-machine speech interaction still appears to be out of reach, especially in challenging environments characterized by significant noise and reverberation. To improve robustness, modern speech recognizers often employ acoustic models based on recurrent neural networks (RNNs) that are naturally able to exploit large time contexts and long-term speech modulations. It is thus of great interest to continue the study of proper techniques for improving the effectiveness of RNNs in processing speech signals. In this paper, we revise one of the most popular RNN models, namely, gated recurrent units (GRUs), and propose a simplified architecture that turned out to be very effective for ASR. The contribution of this work is twofold: First, we analyze the role played by the reset gate, showing that a significant redundancy with the update gate occurs. As a result, we propose to remove the former from the GRU design, leading to a more efficient and compact single-gate model. Second, we propose to replace hyperbolic tangent with rectified linear unit activations. This variation couples well with batch normalization and could help the model learn long-term dependencies without numerical issues. Results show that the proposed architecture, called light GRU, not only reduces the per-epoch training time by more than 30% over a standard GRU, but also consistently improves the recognition accuracy across different tasks, input features, noisy conditions, as well as across different ASR paradigms, ranging from standard DNN-HMM speech recognizers to end-to-end connectionist temporal classification models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818
Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search
Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16961 · Cited by 15,612
Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling
Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.3555 · Cited by 11,008
Self-citationSpeech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks
Graves, A., Mohamed, A.-R., & Hinton, G. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2013.6638947 · Cited by 8,893
Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult
Bengio, Y., Simard, P., & Frasconi, P. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.279181 · Cited by 8,542
Self-citationGreff, K., Srivastava, R. K., Koutnik, J., Steunebrink, B. R., & Schmidhuber, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2016.2582924 · Cited by 6,955
Graves, A., Fernández, S., Gomez, F., & Schmidhuber, J. (2006) · Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning - ICML '06 · doi:10.1145/1143844.1143891 · Cited by 5,370
Cited by
wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representations
Baevski, A., Zhou, H., Mohamed, A., & Auli, M. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.11477 · Cited by 2,369
wav2vec: Unsupervised Pre-Training for Speech Recognition
Schneider, S., Baevski, A., Collobert, R., & Auli, M. (2019) · Interspeech 2019 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2019-1873 · Cited by 1,290
Speaker Recognition from Raw Waveform with SincNet
Ravanelli, M., & Bengio, Y. (2018) · 2018 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT) · doi:10.1109/slt.2018.8639585 · Cited by 896
Self-citationAn Experimental Review on Deep Learning Architectures for Time Series Forecasting
Lara-Benítez, P., Carranza-García, M., & Riquelme, J. C. (2021) · International Journal of Neural Systems · doi:10.1142/s0129065721300011 · Cited by 532
SpeechBrain: A General-Purpose Speech Toolkit
Ravanelli, M., Parcollet, T., Plantinga, P., Rouhe, A., Cornell, S., Lugosch, L., Subakan, C., Dawalatabad, N., Heba, A., Zhong, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.04624 · Cited by 512
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ravanelli, M., Brakel, P., Omologo, M., & Bengio, Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 92-102
- ISSN
- 2471-285X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2794209590
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 21.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Light Gated Recurrent Units for Speech Recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tetci.2017.2762739
- The paper
- Ravanelli, M., Brakel, P., Omologo, M., & Bengio, Y. (2018). Light Gated Recurrent Units for Speech Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tetci.2017.2762739
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.