The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High and Low Annealing Temperatures Increase Both Specificity and Yield in Touchdown and Stepdown PCR
Open accessAbstract
Touchdown (TD) PCR represents a versatile one-step procedure for optimizing PCRs even if the degree of primer-template complementarity is not fully known. The protocol relies on incremental annealing temperature decreases in progressive cycles designed to bracket the melting temperature (Tm) of the reaction. Here we investigate the characteristics of TD PCR that serve to minimize the need to optimize annealing temperature or buffer conditions and yet produce single strong target amplicons. We demonstrate that priming initiates above the optimum annealing temperature; this helps to ensure a competitive advantage for the target amplicon. On the other hand, as the cycling program progresses, annealing temperatures well below the Tm can serve to significantly increase yields in reactions that would otherwise be marginal due to suboptimal buffer composition and yet do not promote spurious amplification. Modified forms of TD PCR, termed stepdown PCR, consisting of fewer but steeper incremental declines in annealing temperature, are also shown to be effective and can simplify thermal cycler programming.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Touchdown PCR for increased specificity and sensitivity in PCR amplification
Korbie, D. J., & Mattick, J. S. (2008) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.133 · Cited by 624
The Root of Angiosperm Phylogeny Inferred from Duplicate Phytochrome Genes
Mathews, S., & Donoghue, M. J. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5441.947 · Cited by 440
Leclerc, D. (1996) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/5.12.1867 · Cited by 397
Raber, J., Wong, D., Buttini, M., Orth, M., Bellosta, S., Pitas, R. E., Mahley, R. W., & Mucke, L. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.18.10914 · Cited by 364
Loss of TGF-β1 Leads to Increased Neuronal Cell Death and Microgliosis in Mouse Brain
Brionne, T. C., Tesseur, I., Masliah, E., & Wyss-Coray, T. (2003) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00766-9 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Hecker, K. H., & Roux, K. H.
- Venue
- BioTechniques
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 478-485
- ISSN
- 0736-6205 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-9818
- OpenAlex
- W2107727025
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High and Low Annealing Temperatures Increase Both Specificity and Yield in Touchdown and Stepdown PCR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2144/19962003478
- The paper
- Hecker, K. H., & Roux, K. H. (1996). High and Low Annealing Temperatures Increase Both Specificity and Yield in Touchdown and Stepdown PCR. BioTechniques. https://doi.org/10.2144/19962003478
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.