Cited by 23Innovations in Medical EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningOnline Learning and Analytics

Use of an Adaptive e-Learning Platform as a Formative Assessment Tool in the Cardiovascular System Course Component of an MBBS Programme

Open access
Gupta, Subir, Ojeh, Nkemcho, Sa, Bidyadhar, Majumder, Md Anwarul Azim, Singh, Keerti, Adams, Oswald Peter·2020·Advances in Medical Education and Practice

Abstract

Background: Technology-enhanced learning includes the adaptive e-learning platform, a data-driven method with computer algorithms, providing customised learning enhancing critical thinking of individual learners. “Firecracker” – an online adaptive e-learning platform, and assessment software, promotes critical thinking, helps prepare students for courses and high-stakes examinations, and evaluates progress relative to co-learners. The objectives of this study were to determine the usage rates of Firecracker, examine the performance of Firecracker formative quizzes, identify the correlation between Firecracker use and performance with that of performance at summative course assessments, and assess students’ satisfaction with Firecracker usage. Methods: Study participants were Year-2 MBBS (Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery) students (n=91) of the Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Barbados. The Firecracker Administrator uploaded quizzes covering basic science content in the Cardiovascular System course. Access, usage, and performance on Firecracker formative quizzes were retrieved from the Firecracker dashboard. A questionnaire sought the views of study participants. Results: Seven sets of quizzes were administered over nine weeks, with weekly student completion rates ranging from 53% to 73%. Mean quiz scores ranged from 52% to 72%. Students completing > 4 quiz sessions compared to those completing ≤ 4 demonstrated significantly better performance in Firecracker quizzes ( P < 0.01), final examinations ( P < 0.01) and in-course assessment plus final examination ( P < 0.05) scores. Correlations between overall Firecracker performance and in-course assessment marks ( P < 0.05); between total overall Firecracker performance and final examination ( P < 0.01); and overall Firecracker performance and total course marks ( P < 0.01) were all significant. Most students (70%) were happy using Firecracker and felt it complemented coursework (78%) and prepared them for course exams (58%) ( P < 0.01). Conclusion: Overall, Firecracker was perceived very positively and welcomed by the students. Students were satisfied with the Firecracker as a formative assessment tool, and its use correlated with improved performance in the course examinations. Keywords: formative assessment, technology-enhanced learning, adaptive learning, Cardiovascular System course, Firecracker, Barbados A Letter to the Editor has been published for this article.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/amep.s267834

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]Firecracker. Available from: https://firecracker.lww.com/. Accessed 4 2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gupta, S., Ojeh, N., Sa, B., Majumder, M. A. A., Singh, K., & Adams, O. P.
Affiliations
  • University of the West Indies (BB)
  • University of the West Indies (TT)
Corresponding author
Majumder, Md Anwarul Azim
Venue
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Published
2020-12
Volume
Volume 11
Pages
989-996
ISSN
1179-7258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3110744847
Cited by
23
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Medical Education and Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
Keywords
adaptive e-learning, formative assessment, technology-enhanced learning, medical students, student satisfaction, quiz performance, summative assessment, critical thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review