Cited by 40Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence Applications

Medicine and Pharmacy Students’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice regarding Artificial Intelligence Programs: Jordan and West Bank of Palestine

Open access
Mosleh, Rami, Jarrar, Qais, Jarrar, Yazun, Tazkarji, Mariam, Hawash, Mohammad·2023·Advances in Medical Education and Practice

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) programs generate responses to input text, showcasing their innovative capabilities in education and demonstrating various potential benefits, particularly in the field of medical education. The current knowledge of health profession students about AI programs has still not been assessed in Jordan and the West Bank of Palestine (WBP). Aim: This study aimed to assess students’ awareness and practice of AI programs in medicine and pharmacy in Jordan and the WBP. Methods: This study was in the form of an observational, cross-sectional survey. A questionnaire was electronically distributed among students of medicine and pharmacy at An-Najah National University (WBP), Al-Isra University (Jordan), and Al-Balqa Applied University (Jordan). The questionnaire consisted of three main categories: sociodemographic characteristics of the participants, practice of AI programs, and perceptions of AI programs, including ChatGPT. Results: A total of 321 students responded to the distributed questionnaire, and 261 participants (81.3%) stated that they had heard about AI programs. In addition, 135 participants had used AI programs before (42.1%), while less than half the participants used them in their university studies (44.2%): for drug information (44.5%), homework (38.9%), and writing research articles (39.3%). There was significantly (48.3%, P < 0.005) more conviction in the use of AI programs for writing research articles among pharmacy students from Palestine compared to Jordan. Lastly, there was significantly more (53.8%, P < 0.05) AI program use among medicine students than pharmacy students. Conclusion: While most medicine and pharmacy students had heard about AI programs, only a small proportion of the participants had used them in their medical study. In addition, attitudes and practice related to AI programs in their education differs between medicine and pharmacy students and between WBP and Jordan. Keywords: artificial intelligence, education, Jordan, medical students, West Bank of Palestine

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/amep.s433255

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although the number of respondents exceeded the required sample size, the response rate was lower compared with similar studies, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.

    “First, although the number of respondents exceeded the required sample size, the response rate was lower compared with similar studies [19, 21, 22, 24, 25, 29, 31, 34, 37, 40, 62], which may limit the generalizability of the findings.”
  • Younger generations tend to become more quickly familiar with technological innovation than previous generations.

    “This result may reflect greater exposure of young people to digital technology and automated learning tools; previous studies have shown a similar association, suggesting that younger generations tend to become more quickly familiar with technological innovation than previous generations [24, 26]”

    From Knowledge and use, Perceptions of Benefits and Limitations of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots among Italian Physiotherapy students: a cross-sectional National Study (2025) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Results (Descriptive Results; page unavailable) list participants’ ages, and the Discussion compares AI use by field of study and country. Neither reports how quickly different generations become familiar with technology or compares younger people with previous generations (searched: age, generation, and younger versus older familiarity). (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mosleh, R., Jarrar, Q., Jarrar, Y., Tazkarji, M., & Hawash, M.
Affiliations
  • An-Najah National University (PS)
  • Isra University (JO)
  • Al-Balqa Applied University (JO)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Jarrar, Yazun
Venue
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Published
2023-12
Volume
Volume 14
Pages
1391-1400
ISSN
1179-7258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389640894
Cited by
40
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Medical Education and Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Al-Balqa' Applied University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, medical students, pharmacy students, AI use in education, student attitudes toward AI, Jordan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review