Cited by 185Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Knowledge, attitude, and practice of artificial intelligence among doctors and medical students in Syria: A cross-sectional online survey

Open access
Swed, Sarya, Alibrahim, Hidar, Elkalagi, Nashaat Kamal Hamdy, Nasif, Mohamad Nour, Rais, Mohammed Amir, Nashwan, Abdulqadir J., Aljabali, Ahmed, Elsayed, Mohamed +9 more·2022·Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Artificial intelligence has been prevalent recently as its use in the medical field is noticed to be increased. However, middle east countries like Syria are deficient in multiple AI implementation methods in the field of medicine. So, holding these AI implementation methods in the medical field is necessary, which may be incredibly beneficial for making diagnosis more accessible and help in the treatment. This paper intends to determine AI's knowledge, attitude, and practice among doctors and medical students in Syria. A questionnaire conducted an online cross-sectional study on the google form website consisting of demographic data, knowledge, and perception of AI. There were 1,494 responses from both doctors and medical students. We included Syrian medical students and doctors who are currently residing in Syria. Of the 1,494 participants, 255 (16.9%) are doctors, while the other 1,252 (83.1%) are undergraduate medical students. About 1,055 (70%) participants have previous knowledge about AI. However, only 357 (23.7%) participants know about its application in the medical field. Most have shown positive attitudes toward its necessity in the medical field; 689 (45.7%) individuals strongly agree, and 628 (41.7%) agree. The undergraduate students had 3.327 times more adequate knowledge of AI than students in the first year. In contrast, the undergraduate 6th-year students had 2.868 times the attitude toward AI higher than students in the first year. The residents and assistant professors had 2.371 and 4.422 times the practice of AI higher than students, respectively. Although most physicians and medical students do not sufficiently understand AI and its significance in the medical field, they have favorable views regarding using AI in the medical field. Syrian medical authorities and international organizations should suggest including artificial intelligence in the medical field, particularly when training residents and fellowship physicians.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/frai.2022.1011524

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hashimoto D. A. Witkowski E. Gao L. Meireles O. Rosman G. (2020). Artificial intelligence in anesthesiology: current techniques, clinical applications, and limitations. Anesthesiology 132, 379– 394. 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002960 31939856 PMC7643051 · DOI
  2. Souza Filho E. M. Fernanadas F. A. Pereira N. C. A. Mesquita C. T. Gismoundi R. A. (2020). Ethics, artificial intelligence and cardiology. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 115, 579– 583. 10.36660/abc.20200143 33027384 PMC9363099 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swed, S., Alibrahim, H., Elkalagi, N. K. H., Nasif, M. N., Rais, M. A., Nashwan, A. J., Aljabali, A., Elsayed, M., Sawaf, B., Albuni, M. K., Battikh, E., Elsharif, L. A. M., Ahmed, S. M. A., Ahmed, E. M. S., Othman, Z. A., Alsaleh, A., & Shoib, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Aleppo (SY)
  • Arish University (EG)
  • Hamad Medical Corporation (QA)
  • Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO)
  • Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
  • Red Sea University (SD)
  • Shendi University (SD)
  • Nile Valley University (SD)
  • Homs University (SY)
  • Damascus University (SY)
Corresponding author
Nashwan, Abdulqadir J.
Venue
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Published
2022-09-29
Volume
5
Pages
1011524-1011524
ISSN
2624-8212 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4298006199
Cited by
185
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 1
FWCI
9.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, knowledge, attitudes and practices, medical students, physicians, clinical implementation of AI, residency training, AI literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review