Cited by 410Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Application of Active Targeting Nanoparticle Delivery System for Chemotherapeutic Drugs and Traditional/herbal Medicines in Cancer Therapy: a Systematic Review

Open access
Muhamad, Nadda, Plengsuriyakarn, Tullayakorn, Na-Bangchang, Kesara·2018·International Journal of Nanomedicine

Abstract

Patients treated with conventional cancer chemotherapy suffer from side effects of the drugs due to non-selective action of chemotherapeutic drugs to normal cells. Active targeting nanoparticles that are conjugated to targeting ligands on the surface of nanoparticles play an important role in improving drug selectivity to the cancer cell. Several chemotherapeutic drugs and traditional/herbal medicines reported for anticancer activities have been investigated for their selective delivery to cancer cells by active targeting nanoparticles. This systematic review summarizes reports on this application. Literature search was conducted through PubMed database search up to March 2017 using the terms nanoparticle, chemotherapy, traditional medicine, herbal medicine, natural medicine, natural compound, cancer treatment, and active targeting. Out of 695 published articles, 61 articles were included in the analysis based on the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The targeting ligands included proteins/peptides, hyaluronic acid, folic acid, antibodies/antibody fragments, aptamer, and carbohydrates/polysaccharides. In vitro and in vivo studies suggest that active targeting nanoparticles increase selectivity in cellular uptake and/or cytotoxicity over the conventional chemotherapeutic drugs and non-targeted nanoparticle platform, particularly enhancement of drug efficacy and safety. However, clinical studies are required to confirm these findings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/ijn.s165210

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some previously published systematic reviews in cancer nano-medicine have focused on specific subsections, like using nanoparticles for actively-targeted delivery of chemotherapeutics or herbal medicine.

    “Some previously published systematic reviews in cancer nano-medicine have focused on specific subsections, like using nanoparticles for actively-targeted delivery of chemotherapeutics or herbal medicine (Muhamad et al., 2018).”

    From Sysrev: A FAIR Platform for Data Curation and Systematic Evidence Review (2021) · cites this paper as Muhamad et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muhamad, N., Plengsuriyakarn, T., & Na-Bangchang, K.
Affiliations
Thammasat University (TH)
Venue
International Journal of Nanomedicine
Published
2018-07
Volume
Volume 13
Pages
3921-3935
ISSN
  • 1176-9114 (ISSN-L)
  • 1178-2013
OpenAlex
W2809924458
Cited by
410
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Nanomedicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Thammasat University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
targeted drug delivery, chemotherapeutic drugs, traditional medicine, herbal medicine, natural compounds, anticancer activity, targeting ligands, hyaluronic acid, folic acid, aptamers, antibody fragments, tumor selectivity, chemotherapy side effects
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Humans, Neoplasms, Drug Delivery Systems, Herbal Medicine, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review