The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antimicrobial activity of metal oxide nanoparticles against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria: a comparative study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Nanomaterials have unique properties compared to their bulk counterparts. For this reason, nanotechnology has attracted a great deal of attention from the scientific community. Metal oxide nanomaterials like ZnO and CuO have been used industrially for several purposes, including cosmetics, paints, plastics, and textiles. A common feature that these nanoparticles exhibit is their antimicrobial behavior against pathogenic bacteria. In this report, we demonstrate the antimicrobial activity of ZnO, CuO, and Fe(2)O(3) nanoparticles against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. METHODS AND RESULTS: Nanosized particles of three metal oxides (ZnO, CuO, and Fe(2)O(3)) were synthesized by a sol-gel combustion route and characterized by X-ray diffraction, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy techniques. X-ray diffraction results confirmed the single-phase formation of all three nanomaterials. The particle sizes were observed to be 18, 22, and 28 nm for ZnO, CuO, and Fe(2)O(3), respectively. We used these nanomaterials to evaluate their antibacterial activity against both Gram-negative (Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis) bacteria. CONCLUSION: Among the three metal oxide nanomaterials, ZnO showed greatest antimicrobial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria used in this study. It was observed that ZnO nanoparticles have excellent bactericidal potential, while Fe(2)O(3) nanoparticles exhibited the least bactericidal activity. The order of antibacterial activity was demonstrated to be the following: ZnO > CuO > Fe(2)O(3).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nanostructures in Biodiagnostics
Rosi, N. L., & Mirkin, C. A. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030067f · Cited by 4,603
Cited by
Singh, J., Dutta, T., Kim, K.-H., Rawat, M., Samddar, P., & Kumar, P. (2018) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-018-0408-4 · Cited by 2,700
Antimicrobial Activity of Metal and Metal‐Oxide Based Nanoparticles
Gold, K., Slay, B., Knackstedt, M., & Gaharwar, A. K. (2018) · Advanced Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/adtp.201700033 · Cited by 758
Khezerlou, A., Alizadeh-Sani, M., Azizi-Lalabadi, M., & Ehsani, A. (2018) · Microbial Pathogenesis · doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2018.08.008 · Cited by 404
Antibacterial activity of ZnO and CuO nanoparticles against gram positive and gram negative strains
Dadi, R., Azouani, R., Traore, M., Mielcarek, C., & Kanaev, A. (2019) · Materials Science and Engineering: C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.109968 · Cited by 284
Guan, G., Zhang, L., Zhu, J., Wu, H., Li, W., & Sun, Q. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123542 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Azam, A., Ahmed, Oves, Khan, Habib, & Memic, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Nanomedicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 6003
- ISSN
- 1176-9114 (ISSN-L)
- 1178-2013
- OpenAlex
- W2018517592
- Cited by
- 1,467
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial activity of metal oxide nanoparticles against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria: a comparative study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2147/ijn.s35347
- The paper
- Azam, A., Ahmed, Oves, Khan, Habib, & Memic, A. (2012). Antimicrobial activity of metal oxide nanoparticles against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria: a comparative study. International Journal of Nanomedicine. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.s35347
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.