Cited by 56Folate and B Vitamins ResearchPregnancy and Medication ImpactMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Women’s awareness and periconceptional use of folic acid: data from a large European survey

Open access
Bitzer, Johannes, von Stenglin, Bannemerschult·2013·International Journal of Women's Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the awareness and use of folic acid in European women of child-bearing age, particularly in the setting of pregnancy and pregnancy planning. METHODS: Between November 2009 and December 2009, women aged 15-49 years old from 18 European countries completed a 30-minute structured questionnaire either online or via face-to-face interviews. To achieve nationally representative samples for each country quotas were set for age, education, income, and regional distribution. RESULTS: A total of 22,925 women participated in the survey. Of the respondents, 58% had at least one biological child, and of these 38% reported that their first pregnancy was not planned. Nearly 60% of women who planned their pregnancy indicated that they had stopped using their method of contraception without first consulting a doctor or another health care professional. Overall, 70% reported that they had heard of folic acid and 40% stated that they knew the benefits of folic acid. However, when prompted to indicate which diseases and/or birth defects folic acid can protect against, only 17% knew that folic acid can reduce the risk of neural tube defects/spina bifida. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of European women of child-bearing age in this survey were unaware that periconceptional folic acid supplementation reduces the risk of birth defects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/ijwh.s40149

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Awareness of preconception health and care is low.

    “Although some studies suggest that awareness of preconception health and care is low, pregnancy planning appears relatively common, indicating a missed and unexploited opportunity for intervention [56–58].”

    From Associations between periconceptional lifestyle behaviours and adverse pregnancy outcomes (2021) · cites this paper as [57]

    The Discussion reports low awareness of the need for periconceptional folic acid and describes missed opportunities to counsel women who planned a pregnancy. It supports the sentence’s point about a specific preconception intervention, but does not assess awareness of preconception health and care more broadly. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pregnancy planning appears relatively common.

    “Although some studies suggest that awareness of preconception health and care is low, pregnancy planning appears relatively common, indicating a missed and unexploited opportunity for intervention [56–58].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. [1]Botto LD Moore CA Khoury MJ Erickson JD Neural-tube defects N Engl J Med 1999 341 20 1509 1519 10559453
  2. [2]Cheschier N for ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics ACOG practice bulletin. Neural tube defects Number 44. Jul 2003 (Replaces committee opinion number 252 Mar 2001) Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003 83 1 123 133 14626221
  3. [4]De-Regil LM Fernández-Gaxiola AC Dowswell T Pena-Rosas JP Effects and safety of periconceptional folate supplementation for preventing birth defects Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010 10 CD007950 20927767 PMC4160020
  4. [7]US Preventive Services Task Force Folic acid for the prevention of neural tube defects: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement Ann Intern Med 2009 150 9 626 631 19414842
  5. [8]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Spina bifida and anencephaly before and after folic acid mandate – United States, 1995–1996 and 1999–2000 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004 53 17 362 365 15129193
  6. [9]Busby A Abramsky L Dolk H Armstrong B for Eurocat Folic Acid Working Group Preventing neural tube defects in Europe: population based study BMJ 2005 330 7491 574 575 15760997 PMC554030
  7. [10]Baykan Z Oztürk A Poyrazoğlu S Gün I Awareness, knowledge, and use of folic acid among women: a study from Turkey Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011 283 6 1259 1253 20552211
  8. [11]Oddy WH Miller M Payne JM Serna P Bower CI Awareness and consumption of folate-fortified foods by women of childbearing age in Western Australia Public Health Nutr 2007 10 10 989 995 17683648
  9. [12]Pötzsch S Hoyer-Schuschke J Seelig M Steinbicker V Knowledge among young people about folic acid and its importance during pregnancy: a survey in the Federal State of Saxony-Anhalt (Germany) J Appl Genet 2006 47 2 187 190 16682762
  10. [13]Sayed AR Nixon J Bourne DE Folic acid awareness among women of reproductive age in Cape Town S Afr Med J 2006 96 1 12 16440103
  11. [14]Kondo A Kamihira O Shimosuka Y Okai I Gotoh M Ozawa H Awareness of the role of folic acid, dietary folate intake and plasma folate concentration in Japan J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2005 31 2 172 177 15771645
  12. [15]French MR Barr SI Levy-Milne R Folate intakes and awareness of folate to prevent neural tube defects: a survey of women living in Vancouver, Canada J Am Diet Assoc 2003 103 2 181 185 12589323
  13. [16]Ringel S Lahat E Elizov T Awareness of folic acid for neural tube defect prevention among Israeli women Teratology 1999 60 1 29 32 10413336
  14. [17]Castilla EE Dutra MG Folate awareness among South American women Lancet 1997 349 9053 735 9078232
  15. [19]Green-Raleigh K Carter H Mulinare J Prue C Petrini J Trends in folic acid awareness and behavior in the United States: the Gallup Organization for the March of Dimes Foundation surveys, 1995–2005 Matern Child Health J 2006 10 Suppl 5 S177 S182 16823638 PMC1592142
  16. [20]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Use of supplements containing folic acid among women of childbearing age – United States, 2007 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2008 57 1 5 8 18185493
  17. [22]Ray JG Singh G Burrows RF Evidence for suboptimal use of periconceptional folic acid supplements globally BJOG 2004 111 5 399 408 15104602
  18. [23]Finer LB Henshaw SK Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001 Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2006 38 2 90 96 16772190
  19. [24]Knudsen VK Orozova-Bekkevold I Rasmussen LB Mikkelsen TB Michaelsen KF Olsen SF Low compliance with recommendations on folic acid use in relation to pregnancy: is there a need for fortification? Public Health Nutr 2004 7 7 843 850 15482608
  20. [25]Poretti A Anheier T Zimmermann R Boltshauser E for Swiss Pediatric Surveillance Unit (SPSU) Neural tube defects in Switzerland from 2001 to 2007: are periconceptual folic acid recommendations being followed? Swiss Med Wkly 2008 138 41–42 608 613 18941947
  21. [26]Daly LE Kirke PN Molloy A Weir DG Scott JM Folate levels and neural tube defects. Implications for prevention JAMA 1995 274 21 1698 1702 7474275
  22. [28]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Trends in wheat-flour fortification with folic acid and iron – worldwide, 2004 and 2007 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2008 57 1 8 10 18185494
  23. [29]Eichholzer M Tönz O Zimmermann R Folic acid: a public-health challenge Lancet 2006 367 9519 1352 1361 16631914
  24. [31]Lassi ZS Bhutta ZA Clinical utility of folate-containing oral contraceptives Int J Womens Health 2012 4 185 190 22570577 PMC3346209
  25. [32]Diefenbach K Trummer D Ebert F Ethinylestradiol/drospirenone/levomefolate calcium versus ethinylestradiol/drospirenone + folic acid: folate status during 24 weeks of treatment and over 20 weeks following treatment cessation Int J Womens Health 2013 5 149 163 23610531 PMC3628530

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bitzer, J., von Stenglin, & Bannemerschult
Affiliations
  • University Hospital of Basel (CH)
  • Bayer (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Bitzer, Johannes
Venue
International Journal of Women's Health
Published
2013-04
Volume
5
Pages
201
ISSN
1179-1411 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024346480
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Women s Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Bayer HealthCare
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Folate and B Vitamins Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
folic acid supplementation, periconceptional supplementation, women's awareness, pregnancy planning, unintended pregnancy, contraceptive discontinuation, neural tube defects, spina bifida, birth defects prevention, women of child-bearing age, European women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review