Cited by 88Periodontal Regeneration and TreatmentsOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsTendon Structure and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MRI Changes After Platelet Rich Plasma Injection in Knee Osteoarthritis (Randomized Clinical Trial)

Open access

Abstract

PURPOSE: Few papers have studied the objective effects of PRP on cartilage. In this study, we investigated the effect of PRP on cartilage characteristics by special MRI sequencing in knee osteoarthritis (IRCT registration number: 2014020413442N6). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this double blind randomized clinical trial, patients with bilateral knees osteoarthritis-grade 1, 2, and 3 were included in the study. Each patient's knees were randomly allocated to either control or treatment groups. PRP was injected in two sessions with 4 week intervals in PRP group. The VAS (visual analog scale) and WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) were utilized and MRI was performed for all patients, before, and 8 months after treatment. The MRI sequences taken were transverse 3D TRUFISP and coronal and sagittal fat saturated proton-density. Imaging was scored according to four cartilage characteristics. RESULTS: 46 knees (from 23 patients) were included in this study. 23 knees in the case group and 23 knees in control group were studied. All patients were female with mean age of 57.57±5.9 years. Mean total WOMAC and VAS changes before and after treatment in control group were 11.61±8.5 and 1.3±1.1 respectively. In PRP group, mean total WOMAC and VAS changes showed better improvement with 20±12.3 and 3.2±1.6 respectively (P-value <0.05). In PRP group, all of the radiologic variables (patellofemoral cartilage volume, synovitis and medial and lateral meniscal disintegrity), with the exception of subarticular bone marrow abnormality, had significant improvement (P-value <0.05). In a comparison between the two groups, patellofemoral cartilage volume and synovitis had significantly changed in the PRP group (P-value <0.05). CONCLUSION: In this study, in addition to the effect of PRP on VAS and WOMAC, there was a significant effect on radiologic characteristics (patellofemoral cartilage volume and synovitis). For further evaluation, a longer study with a larger sample size is recommended.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/jpr.s204788

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In patients with knee osteoarthritis (KL grade 2-3), PRGF resulted in a WOMAC change of Δ-35.4% compared to hyaluronic acid.

    “WOMAC: PRGF Δ-35.4%; VAS: Δ-42.3%.”

    From Management of platelet-rich plasma and stem cells versus conventional treatments in musculoskeletal injury repair: A systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Results report improved WOMAC scores after PRP treatment, but not a 35.4% change. The Methods and baseline table include KL grades 1–3, not only grades 2–3, and the trial compares PRP with a control group rather than PRGF with hyaluronic acid. Pages are not specified in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In patients with knee osteoarthritis (KL grade 2-3), PRGF resulted in a VAS change of Δ-42.3% compared to hyaluronic acid.

    “WOMAC: PRGF Δ-35.4%; VAS: Δ-42.3%.”

    From Management of platelet-rich plasma and stem cells versus conventional treatments in musculoskeletal injury repair: A systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Results (Tables 1–2; page unavailable) show that VAS improved in the PRP group, but they do not report a 42.3% change. The study included KL grades 1–3, used PRP rather than PRGF, and compared it with a control group rather than hyaluronic acid. The claimed percentage and comparison are therefore unsupported by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Raeissadat, S. A., Ghorbani, E., Sanei Taheri, M., Soleimani, R., Rayegani, S. M., Babaee, M., & Payami, S.
Affiliations
  • Shahid Beheshti University (IR)
  • Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Islamic Azad University, Tehran (IR)
Corresponding author
Babaee, Marzieh
Venue
Journal of Pain Research
Published
2020-01
Volume
Volume 13
Pages
65-73
ISSN
1178-7090 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3000655318
Cited by
77
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7
FWCI
11.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
Keywords
platelet-rich plasma, knee osteoarthritis, cartilage, magnetic resonance imaging, synovitis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review