The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Less harmful acidic degradation of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) bone tissue engineering scaffolds through titania nanoparticle addition
Open accessAbstract
In the last 10 years, biodegradable aliphatic polyesters, such as poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), have attracted increasing attention for their use as scaffold materials in bone tissue engineering because their degradation products can be removed by natural metabolic pathways. However, one main concern with the use of these specific polymers is that their degradation products reduce local pH, which in turn induces an inflammatory reaction and damages bone cell health at the implant site. Thus, the objective of the present in vitro study was to investigate the degradation behavior of PLGA when added with dispersed titania nanoparticles. The results of this study provided the first evidence that the increased dispersion of nanophase titania in PLGA decreased the harmful change in pH normal for PLGA degradation. Moreover, previous studies have demonstrated that the increased dispersion of titania nanoparticles into PLGA significantly improved osteoblast (bone-forming cell) functions (such as adhesion, collagen synthesis, alkaline phosphatase activity, and calcium-containing minerals deposition). In this manner, nanophase titania-PLGA composites may be promising scaffold materials for more effective orthopedic tissue engineering applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biodegradable synthetic polymers for tissue engineering
CSIRO Molecular Science, B. 1., & Gunatillake, P. (2003) · European Cells and Materials · doi:10.22203/ecm.v005a01 · Cited by 1,765 · cited 2×
“Since the 1990s, the applications of poly(glycolic acid) (PGA), poly(lactic acid) (PLA), and their copolymers (PLGA) in bone tissue engineering have been investigated extensively (Gunatillake and Adhikari 2003).”
Cited by
Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering
O'Brien, F. J. (2011) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/s1369-7021(11)70058-x · Cited by 3,437
Biodegradable magnesium-based implants in orthopedics-a general review and perspectives
Wang, J., Xu, J., Hopkins, C., Chow, D. H., & Qin, L. (2020) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201902443 · Cited by 574
In situ-forming injectable hydrogels for regenerative medicine
Yang, J.-A., Yeom, J., Hwang, B. W., Hoffman, A. S., & Hahn, S. K. (2014) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.07.006 · Cited by 532
Recent advances of PLGA micro/nanoparticles for the delivery of biomacromolecular therapeutics
Ding, D., & Zhu, Q. (2018) · Materials Science and Engineering: C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2017.12.036 · Cited by 386
Chitosan-based blends for biomedical applications
Seidi, F., Khodadadi Yazdi, M., Jouyandeh, M., Dominic, M., Naeim, H., Nezhad, M. N., Bagheri, B., Habibzadeh, S., Zarrintaj, P., Saeb, M. R., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.05.003 · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, H., Slamovich, E. B., & Webster, T. J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Nanomedicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 541-545
- ISSN
- 1176-9114 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068122984
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Less harmful acidic degradation of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) bone tissue engineering scaffolds through titania nanoparticle addition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2147/nano.2006.1.4.541
- The paper
- Liu, H., Slamovich, E. B., & Webster, T. J. (2006). Less harmful acidic degradation of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) bone tissue engineering scaffolds through titania nanoparticle addition. International Journal of Nanomedicine. https://doi.org/10.2147/nano.2006.1.4.541
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.