Cited by 50Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Galantamine treatment in Alzheimer's disease: response and long-term outcome in a routine clinical setting

Open access
Wallin, Åsa, Minthon, Wattmo, Carina·2011·Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the absence of long-term, placebo-controlled studies of cholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer's disease (AD), analysis of the results of open-label trials becomes crucial. This study aimed to explore the three-year effects of galantamine treatment, as well as subgroups of response and adherence to treatment. METHODS: Two hundred and eighty patients with a clinical diagnosis of AD were included in the prospective, open-label, multicenter Swedish Alzheimer Treatment Study, and received galantamine treatment. Efficacy measures included cognitive tests, ie, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog), functional rating (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale [IADL]), and global rating. Assessments were carried out before treatment and every six months for a period of three years. K-means cluster analysis was used to identify response subgroups. RESULTS: After three years of treatment, the mean change from baseline was 2.6 points in MMSE and 5.6 points in ADAS-cog scores. Globally, half of the patients improved or remained unchanged for two years. Cluster analysis identified two response clusters. Cluster 1 included patients with low ability in ADAS-cog and IADL scores at baseline. Even though the patients in cluster 1 were older and less educated, they responded better at six months compared with patients in cluster 2. Cluster 2 included patients with better ADAS-cog and IADL scores at baseline. Patients in cluster 2 had a higher frequency of the APOE ɛ4 allele, a slower pretreatment progression rate, and remained in the study longer than those in cluster 1. Three-year completers (n = 129, 46%) received higher doses of galantamine compared with dropouts. CONCLUSION: AD patients who received long-term galantamine treatment were cognitively and globally stabilized. Subgroup response analysis identified a better short-term response in older patients with lower cognitive and functional abilities at baseline, a faster pretreatment progression rate, and a lower incidence of the APOE ɛ4 allele. The galantamine dose was higher in the population of completers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/ndt.s24196

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Longer term benefits of cholinesterase inhibitors, from 2 to 4 or more years, have been demonstrated in open-label extension and long-term prospective observational clinical cohort studies.

    “Longer term benefits, from 2 to 4 or more years have been demonstrated in open-label extension 69,[88][89][90] and long-term prospective observational clinical cohort studies.[91][92][93][94][95]”

    From The Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Spectrum (2019) · cites this paper as [95]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]American Psychiatric Association American Psychiatry Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition Washington, DC American Psychiatric Association 1994

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wallin, Å., Minthon, & Wattmo, C.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Skåne University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Wallin, Åsa
Venue
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Published
2011-09
Volume
7
Pages
565
ISSN
1176-6328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978749566
Cited by
50
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • Cilag
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
galantamine, Alzheimer's disease, cholinesterase inhibitors, long-term treatment outcomes, treatment response subgroups, medication adherence, APOE ε4, disease progression rate, cognitive function, functional status, dose escalation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review