Cited by 408Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

A longitudinal study of Alzheimer's disease: measurement, rate, and predictors of cognitive deterioration

Robert G. Stern, Richard C. Mohs, Michael H. Davidson, James Schmeidler, Jeremy M. Silverman, Elisse Kramer‐Ginsberg, T Searcey, Linda M. Bierer +1 more·1994·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective This study measured the annual rate of cognitive change in patients with Alzheimer's disease and determined the effects of clinical variables on that rate. It also compared the ability of two cognitive scales to measure change over the entire range of dementia severity. Method The cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale and the Blessed test for information memory and concentration were given to 111 patients with Alzheimer's disease and 72 nondemented elderly comparison subjects at 6-month intervals for up to 90 months. Longitudinal changes in scores on the cognitive subscale were measured with several different methods of data analysis. Results For the patients with Alzheimer's disease, the annual rate of change in cognitive subscale scores showed a quadratic relationship with dementia severity in which deterioration was slower for mildly and severely demented patients than for patients with moderate dementia. Gender, age at onset, and family history of dementia had no effect on the rate of cognitive deterioration. The comparison group showed a slight improvement in cognitive performance over time. All data analytic methods gave similar results. The cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale was more sensitive to change in both mild and severe dementia than was the Blessed test. Conclusions These results suggest that cognitive deterioration is slow during the early and very late stages of Alzheimer's disease and more rapid…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.151.3.390

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stern, R. G., Mohs, R. C., Davidson, M. H., Schmeidler, J., Silverman, J. M., Kramer‐Ginsberg, E., Searcey, T., Bierer, L. M., & Davis, K. L.
Affiliations
Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1994-03-01
Volume
151
Issue
3
Pages
390-396
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W1472735294
Cited by
408
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 17
FWCI
8.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG-02219, AG 05138, P50AG005138, P01AG002219)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, cognitive decline, dementia severity, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, longitudinal cognitive change, predictors of cognitive decline, age of onset, family history of dementia
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Probability, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review