Cited by 25Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

Validity of the Korean Version of DIVA-5: A Semi-Structured Diagnostic Interview for Adult ADHD

Open access
Hong, Minha, Kooij, JJ Sandra, Kim, Bongseog, Joung, Yoo-Sook, Yoo, Hanik K, Kim, Eui-Jung, Lee, Soyoung Irene, Bhang, Soo-Young +4 more·2020·Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was to assess the validity of the Korean version of the semi-structured Diagnostic Interview for Adult ADHD, third edition (DIVA-5). The secondary aim was to compare sociodemographic and psychiatric comorbidities in adult patients with and without a diagnosis of ADHD. METHODS: A total of 279 participants were recruited from nine psychiatric outpatient clinics in Korea. All participants were administered the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) Plus v.5.0.0, the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale v1.1 (ASRS-v1.1) Symptom Checklist, and DIVA-5. Diagnosis concordance between two board-certified psychiatrists and DIVA-5 were analysed. RESULTS: The DIVA-5 showed a diagnostic accuracy of 92%, a sensitivity of 91.30%, and a specificity of 93.62%. Significant clinical and demographic differences between ADHD and control groups were found. CONCLUSION: The Korean version of DIVA-5 is a reliable tool for assessing and diagnosing ADHD in adult Korean populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/ndt.s262995

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Structured diagnostic interviews, particularly the DIVA-5, enhance diagnostic precision by systematically assessing developmental history and functional impairment across life domains.

    “Structured diagnostic interviews, particularly the DIVA-5, enhance diagnostic precision by systematically assessing developmental history and functional impairment across life domains [119,120].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]Kooij JS. Adult ADHD: Diagnostic Assessment and Treatment. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hong, M., Kooij, J. S., Kim, B., Joung, Y.-S., Yoo, H. K., Kim, E.-J., Lee, S. I., Bhang, S.-Y., Lee, S. Y., Han, D. H., Lee, Y. S., & Bahn, G. H.
Affiliations
  • Myongji Hospital (KR)
  • Inje University (KR)
  • Samsung Medical Center (KR)
  • Ewha Womans University (KR)
  • Soonchunhyang University (KR)
  • Eulji University (KR)
  • Chung-Ang University Healthcare System (KR)
  • Kyung Hee University (KR)
Corresponding author
Bahn, Geon Ho
Venue
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Published
2020-10
Volume
Volume 16
Pages
2371-2376
ISSN
  • 1176-6328 (ISSN-L)
  • 1178-2021
OpenAlex
W3091834383
Cited by
25
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
adult ADHD, Korean adaptation, diagnostic accuracy, psychiatric comorbidity, sociodemographic differences, psychiatric outpatients, ADHD diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review