Cited by 5Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Research TopicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Comparison of the Efficacy Between Standard Measurement-Base Care (MBC) and Enhanced MBC for Major Depressive Disorder: A Pilot Study

Open access
He, Yuru, Wang, Xing, Wang, Zuowei, Zhang, Ping, Huang, Xiaojia, Yu, Meihong, Murphy, Jill, Michalak, Erin +6 more·2024·Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment

Abstract

Purpose: To validate the efficacy of enhanced measurement-based care against standard measurement-based care in patients with major depressive disorder. Patients and Methods: In this pilot study of an ongoing multicenter cluster randomized controlled trails, 160 patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder were enrolled from 2 mental health centers, with a plan to include 12 centers in total. One hundred patients engaged in a six-month evaluation using a technology-enhanced measurement-based care tool, including assessments of clinical symptoms, side effects, and functionality at baseline, two months, four months and six months. Simultaneously, the remaining 60 patients underwent standard paper-based measurement-based care, utilizing the same set of scales over the same six-month period, with assessments at the same time points. Results: Patients utilizing the enhanced measurement-based care tool demonstrated a significantly higher reduction rate in PHQ-9 scores compared to those using standard paper-based measurement-based care during the two-month follow-up. Additionally, a notable positive correlation was observed between the frequency of enhanced measurement-based care tool usage and the quality of life during the two-month follow-up. Conclusion: Enhanced measurement-based care has the effect of reducing depressive symptoms. Our study emphasized that using enhanced measurement-based care via smartphones is a feasible tool for patients with major depressive disorder. Our future study, including results from additional research centers, may further validate the effectiveness of enhanced measurement-based care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/ndt.s468332

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]Lam RW, Chen J, Michalak E, et al. EMBED Phase 2 study protocol v.1.4: a cluster randomized controlled trial of enhanced versus standard measurement-based care implementation for depression. OSF Preprints. 2021. doi: 10.31219/osf.io/9z82u.Lam · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
He, Y., Wang, X., Wang, Z., Zhang, P., Huang, X., Yu, M., Murphy, J., Michalak, E., Liu, J., Yang, T., Yang, X., Fang, Y., Lam, R., & Chen, J.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Shanghai University (CN)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Lam, Raymond
  • Chen, Jun
Venue
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Published
2024-07
Volume
Volume 20
Pages
1465-1473
ISSN
  • 1176-6328 (ISSN-L)
  • 1178-2021
OpenAlex
W4401089222
Cited by
5
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81930033, 81761128032, 2018B030334001, 81771465)
  • Shanghai Clinical Research Center (19MC1911100)
  • Special Project for Research and Development in Key areas of Guangdong Province (2018B030334001)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
measurement-based care, major depressive disorder, smartphone-based assessment, PHQ-9, depressive symptom reduction, quality of life, digital mental health tools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review