Cited by 321Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPsychiatric care and mental health services

Do we know when our clients get worse? an investigation of therapists' ability to detect negative client change

Hatfield, Derek, McCullough, Lynn, Frantz, Shelby H. B., Krieger, Kenin·2010·Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

Abstract

Routine clinical judgment is often relied upon to detect client deterioration. How reliable are therapists' judgments of deterioration? Two related studies were conducted to investigate therapist detection of client deterioration and therapist treatment decisions in situations of deterioration. The first study examined therapists' ability to detect client deterioration through the review of therapy progress notes. Therapist treatment decisions in cases of client deterioration were also explored. Therapists had considerable difficulty recognizing client deterioration, challenging the assumption that routine clinical judgment is sufficient when attempting to detect client deterioration. A second study was a survey of therapists asking how they detect client deterioration and what treatment decisions they make in response. Symptom worsening was the most commonly stated cue of deterioration. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Key Practitioner Message: • Clinicians may have a difficult time detecting when their client's symptoms are worsening. • Outcome assessment strategies do exist to help clinicians detect client deterioration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpp.656

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hatfield, D., McCullough, L., Frantz, S. H. B., & Krieger, K.
Affiliations
Indiana University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Hatfield, Derek
Venue
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-11-13
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
25-32
ISSN
  • 1063-3995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0879
OpenAlex
W2050524608
Cited by
321
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
FWCI
9.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
clinical judgment, treatment decision-making, symptom worsening, outcome measurement
MeSH terms
Affect, Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Competence, Decision Making, Humans, Judgment, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychotherapy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review