Cited by 25Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major DepressionMedicinal Plant Extracts Effects

Profile of agomelatine and its potential in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder

Open access
Levitan, Michelle, Papelbaum, Marcelo, E Nardi, Antonio·2015·Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although many generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) patients respond to the available pharmacological treatments, nearly half of them do not present the expected results. Besides, the side effects associated to some drugs have a negative impact on treatment adherence. Therefore, the aim of this review was to report the clinical profile of agomelatine, a selective melatonergic MT1/MT2 receptor agonist with serotonin 5-HT2c receptor antagonist activities, as a potential pharmacological option in the treatment of GAD. METHODS: We performed a literature review regarding studies that evaluated the use of agomelatine in GAD treatment. RESULTS: Two short-term, double-blinded studies and one prevention-treatment trial evaluated the efficacy of agomelatine in the treatment of GAD. Agomelatine was associated with higher rates of clinical response and remission, when compared to placebo. In addition, the long-term use of agomelatine decreased the risk of relapse of anxiety symptoms, even for the severely ill patients. Besides, the tolerability was satisfactory with the absence of discontinuation symptoms, as observed in previous studies. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and tolerability profiles of agomelatine in the treatment of GAD were good. However, the scarce number of trials, the small sample sizes, and the use of patients without any comorbid conditions were some limitations that impaired the generalization of the results in the general population. Nevertheless, agomelatine is an attractive off-label option in the treatment of GAD that needs more conclusive evidences to establish its role in future guidelines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/ndt.s67470

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Agomelatine's anxiolytic effect seems to be a result of the synergistic action of antagonising 5-HT2C receptors in subcortical areas including hippocampus and MT receptor stimulation enhancing neurogenesis and reducing stress-induced glutamate release.

    “Its anxiolytic effect seems to be a result of the synergistic action of this action, antagonising 5-HT 2C receptors in subcortical areas including hippocampus and the MT receptor stimulation enhancing neurogenesis and reducing stress-induced glutamate release (Levitan et al., 2015;Tardito, Molteni, Popoli, & Racagni, 2012).”
  • Agomelatine has been shown to positively affect sleep-related measures including REM and slow wave sleep and the quality of sleep, so it is likely to be particularly useful for anxiety patient populations with sleep-related symptoms including PTSD and OCD.

    “Since agomelatine has been shown to positively affect sleep-related measures including REM and slow wave sleep and the quality of sleep (Buoli et al., 2017;Guardiola-Lemaitre et al., 2014;Levitan et al., 2015), it is likely to be particularly useful for anxiety patient populations with sleep-related symptoms including also PTSD and OCD (De Berardis et al., 2015).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levitan, M., Papelbaum, M., & E Nardi, A.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Corresponding author
Levitan, Michelle
Venue
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Published
2015-05
Volume
11
Pages
1149
ISSN
  • 1176-6328 (ISSN-L)
  • 1178-2021
OpenAlex
W1942827836
Cited by
25
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects
Keywords
agomelatine, generalized anxiety disorder, off-label drug use, treatment efficacy, tolerability, relapse prevention, medication adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review