Cited by 21Medication Adherence and ComplianceHealthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health services

Perspectives on medicine adherence in service users and carers with experience of legally sanctioned detention and medication: A qualitative study

Open access
Gault, Iris, Gallagher, Chambers·2013·Patient Preference and Adherence

Abstract

AIM: To explore and analyze perceptions of service users and caregivers on adherence and nonadherence to medication in a mental health care context. BACKGROUND: Mental health medication adherence is considered problematic and legal coercion exists in many countries. DESIGN: This was a qualitative study aiming to explore perceptions of medication adherence from the perspective of the service user (and their caregiver, where possible). PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen mental health service users (and six caregivers) with histories of medication nonadherence and repeated compulsory admission were recruited from voluntary sector support groups in England. METHODS: Data were collected between 2008 and 2010. Using qualitative coding techniques, the study analyzed interview and focus group data from service users, previously subjected to compulsory medication under mental health law, or their caregivers. RESULTS: The process of medication adherence or nonadherence is encapsulated in an explanatory narrative. This narrative constitutes participants' struggle to negotiate acceptable and effective routes through variable quality of care. Results indicated that service users and caregivers eventually accepted the reality of their own mental illness and their need for safety and treatment. They perceived the behavior of professionals as key in their recovery process. Professionals could be enabling or disabling with regard to adherence to medication. CONCLUSION: This study investigated service user and caregiver perceptions of medication adherence and compulsory treatment. Participants described a process perceived as variable and potentially doubly faceted. The behavior of professionals was seen as crucial in collaborative decision making on medication adherence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/ppa.s44894

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Therapeutic adherence is described as a fluid process that reinforces collaborative approaches between the patient and the clinician and improves the relationship with professionals, affecting satisfaction with treatment.

    “Some articles described therapeutic adherence as a fluid process that reinforces the collaborative approaches between the patient and the clinician [38,56,76] and improves the relationship with professionals [46], affecting satisfaction with treatment [34,45,62,77,78].”
  • Therapeutic relationships are commonly based on paternalistic views by both HCPs and users, especially when insight or acceptance of mental illness is absent.

    “Nevertheless, therapeutic relationships are commonly based on paternalistic views by both HCPs and users, especially when insight or acceptance of mental illness is absent [76].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [8]Reith M Community Care Tragedies: a Practical Guide to Mental Health Inquiries Birmingham Venture Press 1998
  2. [33]O’Brien AJ McKenna BG Kydd RR Compulsory mental health legislation; a literature review International Journal of Nursing Studies 2009 46 9 1245 1255 19296950
  3. [36]Seale C Researching Society and Culture 3nd ed London Sage Publications Ltd 2012
  4. [39]Strauss A Corbin JM Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded London Sage Publications Ltd 1998
  5. [42]Gobo G Sampling, representativeness and generalisability Seale C Gobo G Gubrium JF Silverman D Qualitative Research Practice London Sage Publications Ltd 2004 435 456
  6. [46]Warne T Keeling J McAndrew S Mental health law in England Barker P Mental Health Ethics: The Human Context London Routledge 2011 275 285

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gault, I., Gallagher, & Chambers
Affiliations
St George's, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Gault, Iris
Venue
Patient Preference and Adherence
Published
2013-08
Volume
7
Pages
787
ISSN
1177-889X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008081968
Cited by
21
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patient Preference and Adherence (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research Repository (Kingston University London) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Kingston University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
medication adherence, medication non-adherence, mental health law, legal coercion, service user perspectives, caregiver perspectives, mental illness, professional conduct, collaborative decision-making, involuntary admission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review