Medication Adherence to Semaglutide versus Empagliflozin in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Observational Study in Saudi Arabia
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) are widely prescribed, yet medication adherence varies. This study evaluated real-world adherence and persistence to semaglutide and empagliflozin among adults with T2D and assessed the associations between adherence and clinical outcomes. Patients and Methods: A retrospective observational study was performed using electronic health records and pharmacy dispensing data from a military hospital in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia, between July 1, 2023 and June 30, 2024. Adults with T2D (≥18 years old) prescribed semaglutide or empagliflozin were included. Medication adherence was quantified using proportion of days covered (PDC). Persistence was defined by absence of treatment gap ≥60 days. Associations between adherence and patient characteristics, and clinical out-comes, were examined. Results: Among 5087 patients (mean age 57.9 ± 12.3 years, mean T2D duration 10.3 ± 7.6 years), 4020 received empagliflozin and 1067 initiated semaglutide. Adherence (PDC ≥ 80%) was observed in 57.7% of semaglutide and 60% of empagliflozin users. Persistence was lower 40% (semaglutide) and 45% (empagliflozin) met the criteria. Sociodemographic variables were not significant predictors of medication adherence. Conclusion: Medication adherence and persistence to both semaglutide once-weekly injection and oral empagliflozin were suboptimal among T2D patients. Adherent patients to both medications experienced a significant improvement in glycemic control. Targeted strategies are needed to enhance patient motivation for consistent medication use and timely refills.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Saudi Arabia, persistence with GLP-1 RAs was 40% at 1 year in a tertiary-care T2DM cohort.
“| Saudi Arabia (tertiary-care cohort) [50] | T2DM | Not reported | 40% persistence at 1 year | Injection burden; patient preference for oral agents |”
From Adherence and Persistence with GLP-1-Based Therapies: International Real-World Evidence and the Role of Nutritional and Lifestyle Support—A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [50]
The Results section (Adherence to Semaglutide and Empagliflozin Among T2D Patients; page unavailable) reports 40% persistence among semaglutide users over 12 months, using a 60-day treatment-gap definition. Materials and Methods identifies the Saudi study site as a tertiary-care hospital. The 40% figure applies specifically to semaglutide, not GLP-1 receptor agonists as a class; the paper also did not measure whether injection burden or preference for oral agents explained persistence. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredInjection burden and cost may drive patients toward oral alternatives in Saudi Arabia.
“suggesting that injection burden and cost may drive patients toward oral alternatives [50]”
From Adherence and Persistence with GLP-1-Based Therapies: International Real-World Evidence and the Role of Nutritional and Lifestyle Support—A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [50]
The Discussion says patients may favor oral medications over injections and reports greater persistence with oral empagliflozin than injectable semaglutide. It does not establish that injection burden drove treatment choice in Saudi Arabia. The Discussion also says medications were free at the study site and cost was not expected to affect adherence there; its co-payment evidence concerns adherence in another analysis, not a shift toward oral alternatives. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn a Saudi tertiary-care cohort, 12-month persistence with injectable semaglutide was approximately 40%, lower than with the oral SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin.
“Evidence from a Saudi tertiary-care cohort indicates that, although GLP-1 RAs are widely prescribed, 12-month persistence with injectable semaglutide is lower than with the oral sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin (approximately 40% vs. a higher rate with sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors)”
From Adherence and Persistence with GLP-1-Based Therapies: International Real-World Evidence and the Role of Nutritional and Lifestyle Support—A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [50]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Davies, M. J., Aroda, V. R., Collins, B. S., Gabbay, R. A., Green, J., Maruthur, N. M., Rosas, S. E., Del Prato, S., Mathieu, C., Mingrone, G., et al. (2022) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci22-0034 · Cited by 2,104 · cited 1× · see citing works
“37”
Gleason, P. P., Urick, B. Y., Marshall, L. Z., Friedlander, N., Qiu, Y., & Leslie, R. S. (2024) · Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy · doi:10.18553/jmcp.2024.23332 · Cited by 172 · cited 1× · see citing works
“20,28,35 In the present study, the patients’ demographics did not significantly affect the level of adherence, suggesting that influencing factors, such as patient preference, polypharmacy, and side effect profiles may alter adherence patterns.”
Moiz, A., Filion, K. B., Tsoukas, M. A., Yu, O. H. Y., Peters, T. M., & Eisenberg, M. J. (2025) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103363 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Adherence and persistence rates of major antidiabetic medications: a review
Lee, D. S. U., & Lee, H. (2022) · Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome · doi:10.1186/s13098-022-00785-1 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- [1]Adapp C. 2. classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes—2022. Diabetes Care. 2021; 45(Supplement_1): S17– S38. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S002 34964875 · DOI · Paper page
- [2]Federation ID. International Diabetes Federation- Diabetes Atlas 11th Edition. 2025. https://diabetesatlas.org/. Accessed June 9, 2025.
- [3]Aldahash R, Aldossari K, Aljohanni N, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus in saudi arabia: prevalence, risk factors, and management strategies: a review. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2025. doi: 10.2174/0118715303361062250122100238 PMC13284648 40183267 · DOI
- [4]Jarrar M, Abusalah MAH, Albaker W, et al. Prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the general population of Saudi Arabia, 2000-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2023; 11(1): 1– 10. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_394_22 36909010 PMC9997860 · DOI
- [5]Delamater AM. Improving Patient Adherence. Clin Diabetes. 2006; 24(2): 71– 77. doi: 10.2337/diaclin.24.2.71 · DOI
- [6]Williams JL, Walker RJ, Smalls BL, Campbell JA, Egede LE. Effective interventions to improve medication adherence in Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Manag. 2014; 4(1): 29– 48. doi: 10.2217/dmt.13.62 PMC4157681 25214893 · DOI
- [7]Religioni U, Barrios-Rodríguez R, Requena P, Borowska M, Ostrowski J. Enhancing therapy adherence: impact on clinical outcomes, healthcare costs, and patient quality of life. Medicina. 2025; 61(1). doi: 10.3390/medicina61010153 PMC11766829 39859135 · DOI
- [8]Evans M, Engberg S, Faurby M, Fernandes J, Hudson P, Polonsky W. Adherence to and persistence with antidiabetic medications and associations with clinical and economic outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic literature review. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022; 24(3): 377– 390. doi: 10.1111/dom.14603 34779107 PMC9299643 · DOI
- [9]Weeda ER, Muraoka AK, Brock MD, Cannon JM. Medication adherence to injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists dosed once weekly vs once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pract. 2021; 75(9): e14060. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14060 33527605 · DOI · Paper page
- [10]Rhee JJ, Han J, Montez-Rath ME, Chertow GM. Comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors versus glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes and mild/moderate chronic kidney disease. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024; 26(4): 1273– 1281. doi: 10.1111/dom.15427 38186297 PMC10932840 · DOI
- [11]Adhikari R, Jha K, Dardari Z, et al. National trends in use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists by cardiologists and other specialties, 2015 to 2020. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022; 11(9): e023811. doi: 10.1161/jaha.121.023811 35475341 PMC9238581 · DOI · Paper page
- [12]King A, Tan X, Dhopeshwarkar N, et al. Recent trends in GLP-1 RA and SGLT2i use among people with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the USA. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2024; 12(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004431 PMC11459310 39366717 · DOI
- [13]Pantanetti P, Ronconi V, Mancin S, et al. Evaluation of clinical and quality of life effects of oral semaglutide use in type 2 diabetes from a public health view: a prospective study in Italy. Diabetology. 2025; 6(8): 80.
- [14]Breit S, Hubl D. The effect of GLP-1RAs on mental health and psychotropics-induced metabolic disorders: a systematic review. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2025; 176: 107415. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2025.107415 40138849 · DOI
- [15]Pantanetti P, Cangelosi G, Alberti S, et al. Changes in body weight and composition, metabolic parameters, and quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with subcutaneous semaglutide in real-world clinical practice. Front Endocrinol. 2024; 15: 1394506. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1394506 PMC11250060 39015186 · DOI
- [16]Najim H, Mohammed M, Rahmah A. Influence of adding empagliflozin to conventional anti-diabetic therapy on quality of life scale for type 2 diabetic patients. Iraqi J Pharmaceut Sci. 2024; 33: 142– 149. doi: 10.31351/vol33iss3pp142-149 · DOI
- [17]Najar IA, Masoodi SR, Mir SA, Bhat MH, Patyar RR, Patyar S. Impact of empagliflozin add-on therapy on quality of life in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with hypertension: a prospective study. Indian J Public Health. 2022; 66(Supplement): S41– s44. doi: 10.4103/ijph.ijph_1070_22 36412472 · DOI
- [18]Tomaszuk-Kazberuk A, Hermann M, Malek F, et al. Impact of empagliflozin on quality-of-life in real-world patients with heart failure: insights from the multinational Emp-Activity study. Eur Heart J. 2025; 46(Supplement_1). doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.1218 · DOI
- [19]Kassem S, Khalaila B, Stein N, Saliba W, Zaina A. Efficacy, adherence and persistence of various glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists: nationwide real-life data. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024; 26(10): 4646– 4652. doi: 10.1111/dom.15828 39109455 · DOI · Paper page
- [20]Uzoigwe C, Liang Y, Whitmire S, Paprocki Y. Semaglutide once-weekly persistence and adherence versus other GLP-1 RAs in patients with type 2 diabetes in a US real-world setting. Diabetes Ther. 2021; 12(5): 1475– 1489. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01053-7 33837922 PMC8099966 · DOI
- [21]Svensson AM, Toll A, Lebrec J, Miftaraj M, Franzén S, Eliasson B. Treatment persistence in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in clinical practice in Sweden. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021; 23(3): 720– 729. doi: 10.1111/dom.14276 33289287 PMC7953897 · DOI · Paper page
- [22]Johnson CE, Sussman WB, Weeda ER. Medication adherence to sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors versus glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024; 26(10): 4544– 4550. doi: 10.1111/dom.15809 39044308 · DOI
- [23]Scannell C, Romley J, Myerson R, Goldman D, Qato DM. Prescription fills for semaglutide products by payment method. JAMA Health Forum. 2024; 5(8): e242026. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2026 39093590 PMC11297375 · DOI
- [26]Cuschieri S. The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019; 13(Suppl 1): S31– s34. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_543_18 30930717 PMC6398292 · DOI · Paper page
- [27]Alwadeai KS, Alhammad SA. Prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and related factors among the general adult population in Saudi Arabia between 2016-2022: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the cross-sectional studies. Medicine. 2023; 102(24): e34021. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000034021 37327272 PMC10270537 · DOI
- [28]Baba Y, Watanabe S, Hayashi S, et al. Semaglutide improves treatment satisfaction and eating behaviour in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024; 26(10): 4787– 4790. doi: 10.1111/dom.15823 39091271 · DOI
- [29]Al Hayek AA, Al Dawish MA. Evaluation of patient-reported satisfaction and clinical efficacy of once-weekly semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: an ambispective study. Adv Ther. 2022; 39(4): 1582– 1595. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02053-0 35119622 · DOI
- [30]Amirthalingam P, Alatawi OS, Hamdan AME, et al. Medication adherence to semaglutide once-weekly injection among type-2 diabetes patients in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia - A cross-sectional study. Patient Preference Adherence. 2025; 19: 2535– 2551. doi: 10.2147/ppa.S534534 40860604 PMC12375302 · DOI
- [31]Coleman CI, Limone B, Sobieraj DM, et al. Dosing frequency and medication adherence in chronic disease. J Manag Care Pharm. 2012; 18(7): 527– 539. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.7.527 22971206 PMC10438207 · DOI
- [32]Boye K, Ross M, Mody R, Konig M, Gelhorn H. Patients’ preferences for once-daily oral versus once-weekly injectable diabetes medications: the REVISE study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021; 23(2): 508– 519. doi: 10.1111/dom.14244 33140575 PMC7839441 · DOI
- [33]Lüdemann J, Dütting ED, Dworak M. Patient preference and tolerability of a DPP-4 inhibitor versus a GLP-1 analog in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin: a 24-week, randomized, multicenter, crossover study. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2015; 6(4): 141– 148. doi: 10.1177/2042018815595584 26301063 PMC4525127 · DOI
- [34]Malik ME, Falkentoft AC, Jensen J, et al. Discontinuation and reinitiation of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1R agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a nationwide study from 2013 to 2021. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023; 29: 100617. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100617 37265783 PMC10230617 · DOI · Paper page
- [36]Essien UR, Singh B, Swabe G, et al. Association of prescription co-payment with adherence to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor therapies in patients with heart failure and diabetes. JAMA Network Open. 2023; 6(6): e2316290– e2316290. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.16290 37261826 PMC10236237 · DOI · Paper page
- [38]Geta ET, Terefa DR, Hailu WB, et al. Effectiveness of shared decision-making for glycaemic control among type 2 diabetes mellitus adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2024; 19(7): e0306296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306296 39083503 PMC11290692 · DOI · Paper page
- [39]Pot CHM, Hietbrink EAG, Laverman GD. Implementing lifestyle counselling into secondary type 2 diabetes care: perspectives from diabetes nurses. Nurs Open. 2025; 12(4): e70183. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70183 40223769 PMC11995167 · DOI
- [40]Alsaidan AA, Thirunavukkarasu A, Alhassan HH, et al. Evaluation of self-management behaviors and its correlation with the metabolic syndrome among the type 2 diabetes mellitus patients of Northern Saudi Arabia. J Clin Med. 2024; 13(1): 118. PMC10779580 38202125
- [41]Kwakye AO, Kretchy IA, Peprah P, Mensah KB. Factors influencing medication adherence in co-morbid hypertension and diabetes patients: a scoping review. Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024; 13: 100426. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100426 38455671 PMC10918559 · DOI
- [42]Georgieva N, Tenev V, Kamusheva M, Petrova G. Diabetes mellitus—digital solutions to improve medication adherence: scoping review. Diabetology. 2023; 4(4): 465– 480.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dziewierz, A., & Siudak, Z. (2026) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu18111761 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ali, M., Amirthalingam, P., Alshareef, H., Alqifari, S., Elsaid Hamdan, A., Alatawi, O., Hakami, F., Albalawi, N., & Aljabri, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Tabuk (SA)
- King Abdulaziz University (SA)
- Corresponding author
- Ali, Mostafa
- ORCID
- Venue
- Patient Preference and Adherence
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2025-12
- Volume
- Volume 19
- Pages
- 4179-4190
- ISSN
- 1177-889X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12724230
- OpenAlex
- W4417465723
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 2.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Patient Preference and Adherence (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Keywords
- medication adherence, semaglutide, empagliflozin, type 2 diabetes, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, treatment persistence, proportion of days covered, glycemic control, military hospital patients
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review