The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Treatment of Palpable Varicocele in Infertile Men: A Meta‐analysis to Define the Best Technique
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT: To date, there have been no randomized, controlled, prospective clinical studies that compare various techniques to describe the best method for the treatment of varicocele in infertile men. This meta‐analysis aims to address the best treatment modality for palpable varicocele in infertile men. A MEDLINE search was performed for articles published between January 1980 and April 2008, and we analyzed 36 studies reporting postoperative spontaneous pregnancy rates and/or complication rates after varicocele repair using various techniques in infertile men with palpable unilateral or bilateral varicocele. Spontaneous pregnancy rates and postoperative complications such as hydrocele formation, recurrence, or persistence were compared among the techniques. In addition, interventional failure with radiologic embolization and reported complications with the laparoscopic approach were reviewed. Overall spontaneous pregnancy rates were 37.69% in the Palomo technique series, 41.97% in the microsurgical varicocelectomy techniques, 30.07% in the laparoscopic varicocelectomy techniques, 33.2% in the radiologic embolization, and 36% in the macroscopic inguinal (Ivanissevich) varicocelectomy series, revealing significant differences among the techniques (P = .001). Overall recurrence rates were 14.97% in the Palomo technique series, 1.05% in the microsurgical varicocelectomy techniques, 4.3% in the laparoscopic varicocelectomy techniques, 12.7% in the radiologic embolization, and 2.63% in the macroscopic inguinal (Ivanissevich) or subinguinal varicocelectomy series, revealing significant difference among the techniques (P = .001). Overall hydrocele formation rates were 8.24% in the Palomo technique series, 0.44% in the microsurgical varicocelectomy techniques, 2.84% in the laparoscopic varicocelectomy, and 7.3% in the macroscopic inguinal (Ivanissevich) or subinguinal varicocelectomy series, revealing significant difference among the techniques (P = .001). We conclude that the microsurgical varicocelectomy technique has higher spontaneous pregnancy rates and lower postoperative recurrence and hydrocele formation than conventional varicocelectomy techniques in infertile men. However, prospective, randomized, and comparative studies with large number of patients are needed to compare the efficacy of microsurgical varicocelectomy with that of other treatment modalities in infertile men with varicocele.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Baazeem, A., Belzile, E., Ciampi, A., Dohle, G., Jarvi, K., Salonia, A., Weidner, W., & Zini, A. (2011) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.018 · Cited by 486
Time for Improvement in Semen Parameters After Varicocelectomy
Al Bakri, A., Lo, K., Grober, E., Cassidy, D., Cardoso, J. P., & Jarvi, K. (2012) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.041 · Cited by 73
Shah, R., Agarwal, A., Kavoussi, P., Rambhatla, A., Saleh, R., Cannarella, R., Harraz, A. M., Boitrelle, F., Kuroda, S., Hamoda, T. A.-A. A.-M., et al. (2023) · The World Journal of Men's Health · doi:10.5534/wjmh.220048 · Cited by 67
Fukuda, T., Miyake, H., Enatsu, N., Matsushita, K., & Fujisawa, M. (2015) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2015.04.014 · Cited by 26
Best time to wait for the improvement of the sperm parameter after varicocelectomy: 3 or 6 months?
Ghaed, M. A., Makian, S. A., Moradi, A., Maghsoudi, R., & Gandomi-Mohammadabadi, A. (2020) · Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia · doi:10.4081/aiua.2020.3.259 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Çayan, S., Shavakhabov, S., & Kadioğlu, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Andrology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-01-02
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-40
- ISSN
- 0196-3635 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-4640
- OpenAlex
- W2042549092
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of Palpable Varicocele in Infertile Men: A Meta‐analysis to Define the Best Technique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2164/jandrol.108.005967
- The paper
- Çayan, S., Shavakhabov, S., & Kadioğlu, A. (2009). Treatment of Palpable Varicocele in Infertile Men: A Meta‐analysis to Define the Best Technique. Journal of Andrology. https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.108.005967
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.