Cited by 267Algal biology and biofuel productionWastewater Treatment and ReuseAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Algal biofuels from wastewater treatment high rate algal ponds

Craggs, R. J., Heubeck, S., Lundquist, T. J., Benemann, J. R.·2011·Water Science and Technology

Abstract

This paper examines the potential of algae biofuel production in conjunction with wastewater treatment. Current technology for algal wastewater treatment uses facultative ponds, however, these ponds have low productivity (∼10 tonnes/ha.y), are not amenable to cultivating single algal species, require chemical flocculation or other expensive processes for algal harvest, and do not provide consistent nutrient removal. Shallow, paddlewheel-mixed high rate algal ponds (HRAPs) have much higher productivities (∼30 tonnes/ha.y) and promote bioflocculation settling which may provide low-cost algal harvest. Moreover, HRAP algae are carbon-limited and daytime addition of CO(2) has, under suitable climatic conditions, the potential to double production (to ∼60 tonnes/ha.y), improve bioflocculation algal harvest, and enhance wastewater nutrient removal. Algae biofuels (e.g. biogas, ethanol, biodiesel and crude bio-oil), could be produced from the algae harvested from wastewater HRAPs, The wastewater treatment function would cover the capital and operation costs of algal production, with biofuel and recovered nutrient fertilizer being by-products. Greenhouse gas abatement results from both the production of the biofuels and the savings in energy consumption compared to electromechanical treatment processes. However, to achieve these benefits, further research is required, particularly the large-scale demonstration of wastewater treatment HRAP algal production and harvest.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2166/wst.2011.100

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The topography for microalgal production should not be elevated from the water source, as this will incur a 6% consumption of energy in pumping for every 100 m elevation.

    “and the topography not elevated from the water source, as this will incur a 6% consumption of energy in pumping for every 100 m elevation [32].”

    From Key Targets for Improving Algal Biofuel Production (2021) · cites this paper as [32]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craggs, R. J., Heubeck, S., Lundquist, T. J., & Benemann, J. R.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NZ)
  • California Polytechnic State University (US)
  • Benemann and Associates, Walnut Creek, California, USA E-mail: jbenemann@aol.com)
Corresponding author
Craggs, R. J.
Venue
Water Science and Technology
Published
2011-02-01
Volume
63
Issue
4
Pages
660-665
ISSN
  • 0273-1223 (ISSN-L)
  • 1996-9732
OpenAlex
W2107710344
Cited by
267
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Water Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
algal biofuels, high rate algal ponds, wastewater treatment, bioflocculation, algal harvesting, elevated CO2, carbon limitation, nutrient removal, biogas, biodiesel, ethanol, bio-oil, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, energy consumption, algal productivity
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Ethanol, Carbon Dioxide, Electricity, Methane, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Biofuels, Eukaryota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review