Cited by 186Silicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesGaN-based semiconductor devices and materialsGa2O3 and related materials

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of Wide-Bandgap Semiconductors for Power Electronics Applications

Open access

Abstract

Recent developmental advances have allowed silicon (Si) semiconductor technology to approach the theoretical limits of the Si material; however, power device requirements for many applications are at a point that the present Si-based power devices cannot handle. The requirements include higher blocking voltages, switching frequencies, efficiency, and reliability. To overcome these limitations, new semiconductor materials for power device applications are needed. For high power requirements, wide-bandgap semiconductors like silicon carbide (SiC), gallium nitride (GaN), and diamond, with their superior electrical properties, are likely candidates to replace Si in the near future. This report compares wide-bandgap semiconductors with respect to their promise and applicability for power applications and predicts the future of power device semiconductor materials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2172/885849

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. B. Ozpineci, L. M. Tolbert, S. K. Islam, and Md. Hasanuzzaman, "Effects of silicon carbide (SiC) power devices on PWM inverter losses," 27th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON'01), Denver, Colorado, 2002, pp. 1187-1192.
  2. B. Ozpineci, L. M. Tolbert, S. K. Islam, ""System level benefits of SiC power devices in dc-dc converters," 10th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE 2003), Toulouse, France, September 2-4, 2003.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ozpineci, B.
Corresponding author
Ozpineci, B.
Published
2004-01-02
OpenAlex
W2102175563
Cited by
186
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Ga2O3 and related materials
Keywords
wide bandgap semiconductors, power semiconductor devices, silicon carbide, gallium nitride, diamond, silicon substitution, blocking voltage, switching frequency, power device reliability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review