Cited by 1,509Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigationBioactive Compounds and Antitumor AgentsCancer therapeutics and mechanisms

Doxorubicin: The good, the bad and the ugly effect

Carvalho, Cristina, Santos, Renato, Cardoso, Susana, Correia, Sonia, Oliveira, Paulo, Santos, Maria, Moreira, Paula·2009·Current Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract

The anthracycline doxorubicin (DOX) is widely used in chemotherapy due to its efficacy in fighting a wide range of cancers such as carcinomas, sarcomas and hematological cancers. Despite extensive clinical utilization, the mechanisms of action of DOX remain under intense debate. A growing body of evidence supports the view that this drug can be a double-edge sword. Indeed, injury to nontargeted tissues often complicates cancer treatment by limiting therapeutic dosages of DOX and diminishing the quality of patients' life during and after DOX treatment. The literature shows that the heart is a preferential target of DOX toxicity. However, this anticancer drug also affects other organs like the brain, kidney and liver. This review is mainly devoted to discuss the mechanisms underlying not only DOX beneficial effects but also its toxic outcomes. Additionally, clinical studies focusing the therapeutic efficacy and side effects of DOX treatment will be discussed. Finally, some potential strategies to attenuate DOX-induced toxicity will be debated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/092986709788803312

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Doxorubicin produces multiple severe side effects including cumulative cardiotoxicity, acute nausea and vomiting, gastrointestinal disturbances, alopecia baldness, and neurologic disturbances.

    “The latter produces multiple severe side effects including the cumulative cardiotoxicity, acute nausea and vomiting, gastrointestinal disturbances, alopecia baldness, and neurologic disturbances (Carvalho et al., 2009).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carvalho, C., Santos, R., Cardoso, S., Correia, S., Oliveira, P., Santos, M., & Moreira, P.
Affiliations
Centro de Neurociências e Biologia Celular (PT)
Corresponding author
Moreira, Paula
Venue
Current Medicinal Chemistry
Published
2009-09-01
Volume
16
Issue
25
Pages
3267-3285
ISSN
0929-8673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102897174
Cited by
1,509
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 102 · 2025: 147 · 2024: 174 · 2023: 169 · 2022: 153 · 2021: 150 · 2020: 120 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 29
FWCI
14.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
Keywords
doxorubicin, anthracyclines, cardiotoxicity, drug toxicity mechanisms, anticancer mechanism, neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, chemotherapy side effects
MeSH terms
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic, Doxorubicin, Humans, Molecular Conformation, Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review