Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 385

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Regeneration of Mammalian Skeletal Muscle: Basic Mechanisms and Clinical Implications

Ciciliot, Stefano, Schiaffino, Stefano·2010·Current Pharmaceutical Design

Abstract

Mammalian skeletal muscles can regenerate following injury and this response is mediated by a specific type of stem cell, the satellite cell. We review here the three main phases of muscle regeneration, including i) the initial inflammatory response and the dual role of macrophages as both scavengers involved in the phagocytosis of necrotic debris and promoters of myogenic differentiation, ii) the activation and differentiation of satellite cells and iii) the growth and remodeling of the regenerated muscle tissue. Nerve activity is required to support the growth of regenerated myofibers and the specification of muscle fiber types, in particular the activation of the slow gene program. We discuss the regeneration process in two different settings. Chronic degenerative diseases, such as muscular dystrophies, are characterized by repeated cycles of segmental necrosis and regeneration involving scattered myofibers. In these conditions the regenerative capacity of satellite cells becomes exhausted with time and fibrosis prevails. Acute traumatic injuries, such as strain injuries common in sport medicine, cause the rupture of large myofiber bundles leading to muscle regeneration and formation of scar tissue and new myotendinous junctions at the level of the rupture. Mechanical loading is essential for muscle regeneration, therefore, following initial immobilization to avoid the risk of reruptures, early remobilization is required to induce correct growth and orientation of regenerated myofibers. Finally, we discuss the causes of age-dependent decline in muscle regeneration potential and the possibility of boosting regeneration in aging muscle and in muscular dystrophies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/138161210790883453

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 385

Metadata

Authors
Ciciliot, S., & Schiaffino, S.
Venue
Current Pharmaceutical Design
Published
2010-03-01
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
906-914
ISSN
1381-6128 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079233330
Cited by
385
References
13
FWCI
9.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regeneration of Mammalian Skeletal Muscle: Basic Mechanisms and Clinical Implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2174/138161210790883453
The paper
Ciciliot, S., & Schiaffino, S. (2010). Regeneration of Mammalian Skeletal Muscle: Basic Mechanisms and Clinical Implications. Current Pharmaceutical Design. https://doi.org/10.2174/138161210790883453

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.