The DOI matches its Crossref record; 161 of the 161 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anionic Antimicrobial Peptides from Eukaryotic Organisms
Abstract
Anionic antimicrobial peptides / proteins (AAMPs) were first reported in the early 1980s and since then, have been established as an important part of the innate immune systems of vertebrates, invertebrates and plants. These peptides are active against bacteria, fungi, viruses and pests such as insects. AAMPs may be induced or expressed constitutively and in some cases, antimicrobial activity appears to be a secondary role for these peptides with other biological activities constituting their primary role. Structural characterization shows AAMPs to generally range in net charge from -1 to -7 and in length from 5 residues to circa 70 residues and for a number of these peptides, post-translational modifications are essential for antimicrobial activity. Membrane interaction appears key to the antimicrobial function of AAMPs and to facilitate these interactions, these peptides generally adopt amphiphilic structures. These architectures vary from the alpha-helical peptides of some amphibians to the cyclic cystine knot structures observed in some plant proteins. Some AAMPs appear to use metal ions to form cationic salt bridges with negatively charged components of microbial membranes, thereby facilitating interaction with their target organisms, but in many cases, the mechanisms underlying the antimicrobial action of these peptides are unclear or have not been elucidated. Here, we present an overview on current research into AAMPs, which suggests that these peptides are an untapped source of putative antimicrobial agents with novel mechanisms of action and possess potential for application in the medical and biotechnological arenas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms
Zasloff, M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415389a · Cited by 8,457
Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria?
Brogden, K. A. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1098 · Cited by 5,829
Peptide Antibiotics and Their Role in Innate Immunity
Boman, H. (1995) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.13.1.61 · Cited by 1,665
Studies on anticancer activities of antimicrobial peptides
Hoskin, D. W., & Ramamoorthy, A. (2008) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.11.008 · Cited by 1,296
Antibacterial peptides for therapeutic use: obstacles and realistic outlook
MARR, A., GOODERHAM, W., & HANCOCK, R. (2006) · Current Opinion in Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.coph.2006.04.006 · Cited by 1,051
Empirical Analysis of Transcriptional Activity in the Arabidopsis Genome
Yamada, K., Lim, J., Dale, J. M., Chen, H., Shinn, P., Palm, C. J., Southwick, A. M., Wu, H. C., Kim, C., Nguyen, M., et al. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1088305 · Cited by 883
Plant pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins: A focus on PR peptides
Sels, J., Mathys, J., De Coninck, B. M. A., Cammue, B. P. A., & De Bolle, M. F. C. (2008) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2008.06.011 · Cited by 836
Dermcidin: A novel human antibiotic peptide secreted by sweat glands
Schittek, B., Hipfel, R., Sauer, B., Bauer, J., Kalbacher, H., Stevanovic, S., Schirle, M., Schroeder, K., Blin, N., Meier, F., et al. (2001) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni732 · Cited by 730
Control of cell selectivity of antimicrobial peptides
Matsuzaki, K. (2009) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.09.013 · Cited by 713
Staphylococcus epidermidis infections
Vuong, C., & Otto, M. (2002) · Microbes and Infection · doi:10.1016/s1286-4579(02)01563-0 · Cited by 708
Cited by
Contribution of bacterial outer membrane vesicles to innate bacterial defense
Manning, A. J., & Kuehn, M. J. (2011) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/1471-2180-11-258 · Cited by 622
Bacterial Biofilm Eradication Agents: A Current Review
Verderosa, A. D., Totsika, M., & Fairfull-Smith, K. E. (2019) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2019.00824 · Cited by 555
Antimicrobial Peptides from Plants
Tam, J., Wang, S., Wong, K., & Tan, W. (2015) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph8040711 · Cited by 489
The antimicrobial protection hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease
Moir, R. D., Lathe, R., & Tanzi, R. E. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.06.3040 · Cited by 456
Reassessing the Host Defense Peptide Landscape
Haney, E. F., Straus, S. K., & Hancock, R. E. W. (2019) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2019.00043 · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- Harris, F., Dennison, S., & Phoenix, D.
- Venue
- Current Protein & Peptide Science
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2009-12-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 585-606
- ISSN
- 1389-2037 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2128986284
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 161
- FWCI
- 11.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anionic Antimicrobial Peptides from Eukaryotic Organisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2174/138920309789630589
- The paper
- Harris, F., Dennison, S., & Phoenix, D. (2009). Anionic Antimicrobial Peptides from Eukaryotic Organisms. Current Protein & Peptide Science. https://doi.org/10.2174/138920309789630589
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.