Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 332

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 161 of the 161 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Anionic Antimicrobial Peptides from Eukaryotic Organisms

Harris, Frederick, Dennison, Sarah, Phoenix, David·2009·Current Protein & Peptide Science

Abstract

Anionic antimicrobial peptides / proteins (AAMPs) were first reported in the early 1980s and since then, have been established as an important part of the innate immune systems of vertebrates, invertebrates and plants. These peptides are active against bacteria, fungi, viruses and pests such as insects. AAMPs may be induced or expressed constitutively and in some cases, antimicrobial activity appears to be a secondary role for these peptides with other biological activities constituting their primary role. Structural characterization shows AAMPs to generally range in net charge from -1 to -7 and in length from 5 residues to circa 70 residues and for a number of these peptides, post-translational modifications are essential for antimicrobial activity. Membrane interaction appears key to the antimicrobial function of AAMPs and to facilitate these interactions, these peptides generally adopt amphiphilic structures. These architectures vary from the alpha-helical peptides of some amphibians to the cyclic cystine knot structures observed in some plant proteins. Some AAMPs appear to use metal ions to form cationic salt bridges with negatively charged components of microbial membranes, thereby facilitating interaction with their target organisms, but in many cases, the mechanisms underlying the antimicrobial action of these peptides are unclear or have not been elucidated. Here, we present an overview on current research into AAMPs, which suggests that these peptides are an untapped source of putative antimicrobial agents with novel mechanisms of action and possess potential for application in the medical and biotechnological arenas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/138920309789630589

Cites

161 of 161 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 161 references

Cited by

See all 332

Metadata

Authors
Harris, F., Dennison, S., & Phoenix, D.
Venue
Current Protein & Peptide Science
Published
2009-12-01
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
585-606
ISSN
1389-2037 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128986284
Cited by
332
References
161
FWCI
11.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anionic Antimicrobial Peptides from Eukaryotic Organisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2174/138920309789630589
The paper
Harris, F., Dennison, S., & Phoenix, D. (2009). Anionic Antimicrobial Peptides from Eukaryotic Organisms. Current Protein & Peptide Science. https://doi.org/10.2174/138920309789630589

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.