Cited by 150Angiogenesis and VEGF in CancerStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Exercise-Induced Overexpression of Angiogenic Factors and Reduction of Ischemia / Reperfusion Injury in Stroke

Ding, Yun-Hong, Luan, Xia-Dong, Li, Jie, Rafols, Jose, Guthinkonda, M., Diaz, Fernando, Ding, Yuchuan·2004·Current Neurovascular Research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if exercise could induce expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiopoietin 1 and 2, in association with angiogenesis; and if angiogenic changes correlated with reduced brain injury in stroke. Adult male Sprague Dawley rats (3 month old, n=44) were exercised on a treadmill 30 minutes each day for 1, 3 or 6 weeks, or housed as non-exercised controls for 3 weeks. Some 3 week-exercised rats were then housed for an additional 3 weeks. Exercise significantly (p<0.01) increased mRNA (determined by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction) expression of angiopoietin 1 and 2 as early as 1 week, with further increases occurring at 3 weeks. A mild increase after 1 week and a robust increase after 3 weeks of exercise in four isoforms (120, 144, 164, 188) of VEGF mRNA levels were significantly (p<0.01) observed, with VEGF(144) being more markedly up-regulated. Overexpression of the mRNAs decreased upon withdrawal of exercise. A significant increase (p<0.01) in the density of microvessels (determined by laminin-immunocytochemistry) was found at 3 weeks of exercise and this continued after exercise was withdrawn. In exercising rats subjected to 2-h MCA occlusion followed by 48-h reperfusion, neurological deficits and infarct volume were significantly reduced. Neuroprotection continued after 3 weeks of rest. This study indicates that pre-ischemic exercise reduces brain injury in stroke. The reduced damage is a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1567202043361875

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ding, Y.-H., Luan, X.-D., Li, J., Rafols, J., Guthinkonda, M., Diaz, F., & Ding, Y.
Affiliations
Wayne State University (US)
Venue
Current Neurovascular Research
Published
2004-12-01
Volume
1
Issue
5
Pages
411-420
ISSN
1567-2026 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099992963
Cited by
150
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 17
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Neurovascular Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (09-59-00(M02)ER)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
physical activity, stroke, ischemia-reperfusion injury, angiogenesis, vascular endothelial growth factor, angiopoietin-1, angiopoietin-2, VEGF isoforms, microvessel density, neuroprotection, middle cerebral artery occlusion, infarct size, gene expression
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Gene Expression Regulation, Immunohistochemistry, Laminin, Male, Neurologic Examination, Physical Conditioning, Animal, Random Allocation, Time Factors, Reperfusion Injury, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Neovascularization, Physiologic, Brain Infarction, Stroke, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Angiogenesis Inducing Agents, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review