Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 444

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recent Advances in Pathophysiology of Traumatic Brain Injury

Open access
Kaur, Parmeet, Sharma, Saurabh·2018·Current Neuropharmacology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) constitutes the primary reason for mortality and morbidity in persons worldwide below 45 years of age. 1.7 million Traumatic events occur yearly in the United States alone, considering for 50,000 deaths. In severe traumatic brain injury sufferers, a considerable achievement attained in treating short-term consequences; but till date, huge failures are occurring in researcher's capability to render severe traumatic brain injury sufferers to an elevated degree of performing. METHODS: Initial damage force results in Primary brain injury, causing tissue destruction and distortion in the early post-injury period. These secondary injuries from TBI cause changes in cell performance and dissemination of trauma via activities like free-radical generation, depolarization, and formation of edema, excitotoxicity, and disruption of blood brain barrier, calcium homeostasis, and intracranial hematoma. The expectation for developing effect in TBI sufferers is the best knowledge of these activities and enhancement of remedies that restrict secondary brain damage. RESULTS: The focal point of this study is on knowing the complex outburst of secondary impairments and studying the pathophysiology of TBI which provides alternative treatment benefits. CONCLUSION: While injured persons demonstrate dissimilar levels of harm and every case is novel with specific recovery profiles, this article strengthens the recent pathophysiological sight of TBI mainly attention on oxidative stress, excitotoxicity, cerebral oxygenation and cerebral blood flow (CBF), development of edema, and inflammatory activities. For initial research acknowledgment of these recurring factors could permit clarification of possible beneficial targets.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1570159x15666170613083606

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kaur, P., & Sharma, S.
Venue
Current Neuropharmacology
Published
2018-08-21
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
1224-1238
ISSN
1570-159X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2699395010
Cited by
444
References
15
FWCI
8.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.