Cited by 20Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareMachine Learning in HealthcareDiabetes Management and Research

A Review of Statistical and Machine Learning Techniques for Microvascular Complications in Type 2 Diabetes

Sambyal, Nitigya, Saini, Poonam, Syal, Rupali·2021·Current Diabetes Reviews

Abstract

Background and Introduction: Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder that has emerged as a serious public health issue worldwide. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), without interventions, the number of diabetic incidences is expected to be at least 629 million by 2045. Uncontrolled diabetes gradually leads to progressive damage to eyes, heart, kidneys, blood vessels, and nerves. Methods The paper presents a critical review of existing statistical and Artificial Intelligence (AI) based machine learning techniques with respect to DM complications, mainly retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy. The statistical and machine learning analytic techniques are used to structure the subsequent content review. Results It has been observed that statistical analysis can help only in inferential and descriptive analysis whereas, AI-based machine learning models can even provide actionable prediction models for faster and accurate diagnosis of complications associated with DM. Conclusion The integration of AI-based analytics techniques, like machine learning and deep learning in clinical medicine, will result in improved disease management through faster disease detection and cost reduction for the treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1573399816666200511003357

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Generative AI models can detect early signs of nerve and kidney damage by analyzing patient biomarkers and longitudinal health data.

    “Similar applications have been explored in predicting neuropathy and nephropathy, where generative AI models can detect early signs of nerve and kidney damage by analyzing patient biomarkers and longitudinal health data (78).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sambyal, N., Saini, P., & Syal, R.
Affiliations
Punjab Engineering College (IN)
Corresponding author
Sambyal, Nitigya
Venue
Current Diabetes Reviews
Published
2021-02
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
143-155
ISSN
1573-3998 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3022998446
Cited by
19
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Diabetes Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, microvascular complications, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic neuropathy, diabetic nephropathy, machine learning, deep learning, artificial intelligence in healthcare, prediction model
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review