Cited by 25Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesSodium Intake and HealthClinical practice guidelines implementation

Hypertension in Egypt: A Systematic Review

Hasan, Doaa, Emeash, Aya, Mustafa, Sara, Abdelazim, Galal, El-din, Aya·2015·Current Hypertension Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With 29% of the world’s adult population projected to have hypertension by the year 2025, prevention and management of hypertension have become a public health priority. Hypertension also referred to as high blood pressure, in which the arteries have persistent high blood pressure. This results in a condition where the heart has to work harder than normal to flow blood through the vessels. A few years ago, there was no sufficient information about the epidemiology of hypertension, treatment protocols and its consequences in Egypt. Lately, there has been a major change in health system in Egypt, including research development. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the existing data on prevalence, levels of awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Egypt with a view of suggestive actions that could enhance control of hypertension and improve quality of life of the patients. METHODS: Six databases (Pub Med, Cochrane, MEDLINE, Sciencedirect, MedEase, Embase) were searched in November 2013, applying the following criteria: published from January 1995 to November 2013 written in English and carried out on human subjects. RESULTS: 21 studies were included in the systematic review of the prevalence, awareness, and control of hypertension in Egypt. The sample size ranged from 27 subjects to 12008 subjects, and the age range from 6-95 years. Every study had both male and female representatives. In most of the studies, the women were more than the men. CONCLUSION: There are declines in the levels of awareness of hypertension and even lower levels of control. Research is required to reveal reasons behind these near to the ground levels of control and treatment, and especially awareness, in order to put in the picture policy for the improvement of quality of life of hypertensive patients in Egypt.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1573402111666141217111807

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hasan, D., Emeash, A., Mustafa, S., Abdelazim, G., & El-din, A.
Affiliations
Cairo University (EG)
Corresponding author
  • Emeash, Aya
  • El-din, Aya
Venue
Current Hypertension Reviews
Published
2015-01-27
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
134-141
ISSN
1573-4021 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105037702
Cited by
25
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Hypertension Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
hypertension, Egypt, hypertension prevalence, hypertension awareness, antihypertensive therapy, blood pressure control, health care reform, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antihypertensive Agents, Attitude of Health Personnel, Awareness, Blood Pressure, Child, Egypt, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Prevalence, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review